Technological Development and Fisheries Management

REFERENCES

• Andersen, B. S., Ulrich, C., Eigaard, O. R., and Christensen, A. S. Short-term choice behaviour in a mixed fishery: investigating métier selection in the Danish gillnet fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 69: 131–143 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, P., L. Jordan, R. Spieler, G. Relini, J. Ryland, and H. J. Dumont. Fish assemblages on sunken vessels and natural reefs in southeast Florida, USA, pp. 157–171. In: Biodiversity in Enclosed Seas and Artificial Marine Habitats, Vol. 193. Developments in Hydrobiology (Dumont, H. J., Ed.). London: Springer (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Banks, R., S. Cunningham, W. P. Davidse, E. Lindebo, A. Reed, E. Sourisseau, and J. W. de Wilde. The impact of technological progress on fishing effort. LEI Report, PR.02.01. Available from http://applicaties.wageningenur.nl/wever.internet/applications/leirapporten/defaultuk.aspx?id=284 [accessed 29 November 2013] (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Bastardie, F., J. R. Nielsen, B. S. Andersen, and O. R. Eigaard. Integrating individual trip planning in energy efficiency – Building decision tree models for Danish fisheries. Fish. Res., 143: 119–130 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batsleer, J., J. J. Poos, P. Marchal, Y. Vermard, and A. D. Rijnsdorp. Mixed fisheries management: protecting the weakest link. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 479: 177–190 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J., W. N. Venables, C. M. Dichmont, and D. J. Sterling. Standardizing cathc rates: is logbook information by itself enough? ICES J. Mar. Sci., 65: 255–266 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bjørndal, T., P. Koundouri, and S. Pascoe. Multi-Output Distance Function for the North Sea Beam Trawl Fishery, pp. 125–146. In: Multi-Output Measures of Technical Efficiency in EU Fisheries (Pascoe, S., D. Tingley, and S. Mardle, Eds.), UK: CEMARE, University of Portsmouth. CEMARE Report 62 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Braccini, J. M., M. F. O’Neill, A. B. Campell, G. M. Leigh, and A. J. Courtney. Fishing power and standardized catch rates: implications of missing vessel-characteristic data from the Australian eastern king prawn (Melicertus plebejus) fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 69: 797–809 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Branch, T. A., R. Hilborn, and A. C. Haynie, et al. Fleet dynamics and fishermen behaviour: lessons for fisheries managers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 63: 1647–1668 (2006a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch, T. A., and R. Hilborn. Matching catches to quotas in a multispecies trawl fishery: targeting and avoidance behaviour under individual transferable quotas. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 65: 1435–1446 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Branch, T. A., K. Rutherford, and R. Hilborn. Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding. Mar. Policy, 30: 281–292 (2006b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, L. S. Reducing seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 8: 31–56 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, T. L., C. L. J. Frid, and T. S. Gray. Discards in North Sea fisheries: causes, consequences and solutions. Mar. Policy, 29: 421–430 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, A. T. Fishery science: the study of fishery systems. Aquat. Living Resour., 8: 233–239 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Creutzberg, F., G. C. A. Duineveld, and G. J. Van Noort. The effect of different number of tickler chains on beam trawl catches. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 43: 159–168 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S., and D. Whitmarsh. Fishing effort and fisheries policy. Mar. Policy, 4: 309–316 (1980).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daan, N. TAC management in North Sea flatfish fisheries. J. Sea Res., 37: 321–341 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Dagorn, L., K. N. Holland, V. Restrepo, and G. Moreno. Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish and Fisheries, 14: 391–415 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Damalas, D., C. D. Maravelias, and S. Kavadas. Advances in fishing power: A study spanning 50 years. Rev. Fish. Sci., 22: 112–121 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• EC. Reflections on further reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. EC working document. Available from http://www.cfp-reformwat ch.eu/pdf/reflection_cfp_08_mid.pdf [accessed 29 November 2013 ] (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Eigaard, O. R. A bottom-up approach to technological development and its management implications in a commercial fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66: 916–927 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Eigaard, O. R., B. Herrmann, and J. R. Nielsen. Influence of grid orientation and time of day on grid sorting in small-meshed trawl fishery for Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii). Aquat. Living Resour., 25: 15–26 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigaard, O. R., and S. Munch-Petersen. Influence of fleet renewal and trawl development on landings per unit effort of the Danish northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 68: 26–31 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Eigaard, O. R., D. Rihan, N. Graham, A. Sala, and K. Zachariassen. Improving fishing capacity descriptors: modelling engine power and gear-size relations of five European trawl fleets. Fish. Res., 110: 39–46 (2011b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigaard, O. R., B. Thomsen, H. Hovgaard, A. Nielsen, and A. D. Rijnsdorp. Fishing power increases from technological development in the Faroe Islands longline fishery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 68: 1970–1982 (2011a).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Report of the Technical consultation on the measurement of fishing capacity. FAO Fisheries report No. 615, 51 pp (2000).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Measuring and appraising capacity in fisheries: framework, analytical tools and data aggregation. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 994, 39 pp (2004).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA). FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome. Available from http://www.fao.org/docrep/016/i2727e/i2727e00.htm [accessed 29 November 2013] (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, E., A. D. M. Smith, D. C. Smitf, and I. van Putten. Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish., 12: 2–17 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galili, E., and B. Rosen. Fishing gear from a 7th-century shipwreck off Dor, Israel. Int. J. Naut. Archaeol., 37: 67–76 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gislason, H. The requirements of an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management, pp. 307–328. In: The knowledge base for Fisheries management (Motos, L., and D. C. Wilson, Eds.). Developments in Aquaculture and Fisheries Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, N., R. S. T. Ferro, W. A. Karp, and P. MacMullen. Fishing practice, gear design, and the ecosystem approach—three case studies demonstrating the effect of management strategy on gear selectivity and discards. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 64: 744–750 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttormsen, A. G., and K. H. Roll. Technical efficiency in a heterogeneous fishery: the case of Norwegian Groundfish Fisheries. Mar. Resour. Econ., 26: 293–307 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. A. An ecological view on the tuna-dolphin problem. Impacts and trade-offs. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher, 8: 1–34 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R. Fleet dynamics and individual variation: why some people catch more fish than others. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42: 2–13 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R., J. M. (Lobo) Oresanz, and A. M. Parma. Institutions, incentives and the future of fisheries. Philos. T. R. Soc. Lon. B, 360: 47–57 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hintzen, N. T., F. Bastardie, D. J. B. Beare, G. Piet, C. Ulrich, N. Deporte, J. Egekvist, and H. Degel. VMStools: open-source software for the processing, analysis and visualization of fisheries logbook and VMS data. Fish. Res., 115: 31–43 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwood, J. W., and R. S. Millner. Cold induced abnormal catches of sole. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 78: 81–84 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, T., S. Mardle, and A. N. Tidd. The decline of the English and Welsh fishing fleet?, pp. 26–48. In: Advances in fisheries science: 50 years on from Beverton and Holt (Payne, A., J. Cotter, and T. Potter, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, T., S. Pascoe, B. Rackham, and C. O’Brien. A comparison of technical efficiency estimates for seven English fleets in the North Sea from stochastic production frontier (SPF) and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), pp. 56–70. In: Single output measures of technical efficiency in EU fisheries (Pascoe, S., and S. Mardle, Eds.). UK: CEMARE, University of Portsmouth. CEMARE Report 61 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Jákupsstovu, S. H. I., L. R. Cruz, J.-J. Maguire, and J. Reinert. Effort regulation of the demersal fisheries at the Faroe Islands: a 10-year appraisal. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 64: 730–737 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kindt-Larsen, L., E. Kirkegaard, and J. Dalskov. Fully documented fishery: a tool to support a catch quota management system. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 68: 1606–1610 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkley, J., P. C. J. Morrison, S. Cunningham, and J. Cantzano. Embodied and disembodied technical change in fisheries: an analysis of the Sète trawl fishery, 1985–1999. Environ. Resour. Econ., 29: 191–217 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, F., O. R. Eigaard, and J. Tougaard. Reduction of harbour porpoise by catch by high density gill nets. Fish. Res., 85: 270–278 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindebo, E. Role of subsidies in EU fleet capacity management. Mar. Resour. Econ., 20: 445–466 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, N., R. Frandsen, R. Holst, and L. A. Krag. Development of new concepts for escape windows to minimise cod catches in Norway lobster fisheries. Fish. Res., 103: 25–29 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mahévas, S., Y. Sandon, and A. Biseau. Quantification of annual variations in fishing power due to vessel characteristics: an application to bottom-trawlers of South Brittany targeting anglerfish (Lophius budgegassa, Lophius piscatorius). ICES J. Mar. Sci., 61: 71–83 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahévas, S., Y. Vermard, N. Goascoz, et al. An investigation of human versus technological variation in catchability for a selection of European fleets. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 68: 2252–2263 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Main, J., and G. I. Sangster. A study of a multi-level bottom trawl for species separation using direct observation techniques. Scottish Fisheries Research Report, No 26, 17 pp. (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, P. (Ed.): Technological developments and tactical adaptations of important EU fleets (TECTAC No. QLK5-2001-01291). Final project report (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, P., B. S. Andersen, D. Bromley, et al. Improving the definition of fishing effort for important European fleets by accounting for the skipper effect. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 63: 510–533 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, P., B. Andersen, B. Caillart, O. R. Eigaard, O. Guyader, H. Hovgaard, A. Iriondo, F. L. Fur, J. Sacchi, and M. Santurtún. Impact of technological creep on fishing effort and fishing mortality, for a selection of European fleets. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 64: 192–209 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, P., P. Lallemand, K. Stokes, and O. Thébaud. A comparative review of the fisheries resource management systems in New Zealand and in the European Union. Aquat. Living Resour., 22: 463–481 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchal, P., C. Ulrich, K. Korsbrekke, M. Pastoors, B. Rackham, and H. Hovgård. Variations in catchability and fish stock assessments. Sci. Mar., 67 (Suppl. 1): 63–73 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, P., C. Ulrich, K. Korsbrekke, M. Pastoors, and B Rackham. A comparison of three indices of fishing power on some demersal fisheries of the North Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 59: 604 –623 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Martell, S. J. D., and C.J. Walters. Implementing harvest rate objectives by directly monitoring exploitation rates and estimating changes in catchability. B. Mar. Sci., 70: 695–713 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder, M. N., J. R. Sibert, A. Fonteneau, J. Hampton, P. Kleiber, and S. J. Harley. Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess the status of individual stocks and communities. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63: 1373–1385 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maunder, M. N., and A. E. Punt. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish. Res., 70: 141–159 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, M. R., A. Henry, C. D. Elvidge, et al. Fishery dynamics of the California market squid (Loligo opalescens) as measured by satellite remote sensing. Fish. B., 102: 661–670 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murawski, S. A., and J. T. Finn. Optimal effort allocation among competing mixed-species fisheries, subject to fishing mortality constraints. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 43: 90–100 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. F., A. J. Courtney, C. T. Turnbull, N. M. et al. Comparison of relative fishing power between different sectors of the Queensland trawl fishery, Australia. Fish. Res., 65: 309–321 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. F., and G. M. Leigh. Fishing power increases continue in Queensland's east coast trawl fishery, Australia. Fish. Res., 85: 84–92 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S., J. L. Andersen, and J. W. de Wilde. The impact of management regulation on the technical efficiency of vessels in the Dutch beam trawl fishery. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 28: 187–206 (2001a).
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S., and L. Coglan. Implications of differences in technical efficiency of fishing boats for capacity measurement and reduction. Mar. Policy, 24: 301–307 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S., L. Coglan, and S. Mardle. Physical versus harvest-based measures of capacity: the case of the United Kingdom vessel capacity unit system. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 58: 1243–1252 (2001b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe, S., D. Tingley, and B. Cattermoul. Estimating the efficiency of UK English Channel vessels using DEA and Stochastic Production Frontiers, pp. 22–55. In: Single Output Measures of Technical Efficiency in EU Fisheries (Pascoe, S., and S. Mardle, Eds.). UK: CEMARE, University of Portsmouth, CEMARE Report 61 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Poos, J. J., J. A. Bogaards, F. J. Quirijns, D. M. Gillis, and A. D. Rijnsdorp. Individual quotas, fishing effort allocation, and over-quota discarding in mixed fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 67: 323–333 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poos, J. J., and A. D. Rijnsdorp. An “experiment” on effort allocation of fishing vessels: the role of interference competition and area specialization. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 64: 304–313 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Quirijns, F. J., J. J. Poos, and A. D. Rijnsdorp. Standardizing commercial CPUE data in monitoring stock dynamics: Accounting for targeting behaviour in mixed fisheries. Fish. Res., 89: 1–8 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Rahikainen, M., and S. Kuikka. Fleet dynamics of herring trawlers-change in gear size and implications for interpretation of catch per unit effort. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 59: 531–541 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., P. Marchal, S. Mardle, et al. From fish to fisheries: the changing of focus of management advice, pp. 135–144. In: Advances in Fisheries Science, 50 years on from Beverton and Holt (Payne, A., J. Cotter, and T. Potter, Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. G., N. Graham, D. J. Rihan, et al. Do big boats tow big nets? ICES J. Mar. Sci., 68: 1663–1669 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Rihan, D. Comparison of twin-rig and single-rig trawling in terms of relative fishing efficiency, pp. 43–51. In: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Vol. 482. Economic Performance and Fishing Efficiency of Marine Capture Fisheries (Mitchell, R., Ed.). (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rijnsdorp, A. D., Daan, N., and Dekker, W. Partial fishing mortality per fishing trip: a useful indicator of effective fishing effort in mixed demersal fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63: 556–566 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rijnsdorp, A. D., N. Daan, W. Dekker, J. J Poos, and W. L. T. Van Densen. Sustainable use of flatfish resources: addressing the credibility crisis in mixed fisheries management. J. Sea Res., 57: 114–125 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Rijnsdorp, A. D., J. J. Poos, R. HilleRisLambers, J.-W. De Wilde, and W. M. Den Heijer. The arms race between fishers. J. Sea Res., 60: 126–138 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnsdorp, A. D., J. J. Poos, and F. J. Quirijns. Spatial dimension and exploitation dynamics of local fishing grounds by fishers targeting several flatfish species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 68: 1064–1076 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Robins, C. M., Y. Wang, and D. Die. The impact of global positioning systems and plotters on fishing power in the northern prawn fishery, Australia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55: 1645–16 51(1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. A., and D. W. Kulka. Hyperaggregation of fish and fisheries: how catch-per-unit-effort increased as the northern cod (Gadus morhua) declined. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 56 (Suppl. 1): 118–127 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, T., and S. Stead. Days at sea: from the fishers’ mouth. Mar. Policy, 27: 281–288 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, J. C. Commercial fishing methods, an introduction to vessels and gears. Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science Ltd, 359 pp. (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Salas, S., and D. Gaertner. The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management Implications. Fish Fish., 5: 153–167 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. G. Fishing effort control: could it work under the common fisheries policy? Fish. Res., 63: 149–153 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerton, D. A. Do Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) and walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) lack a herding response to the doors, bridles, and mudclouds of survey trawls? ICES J. Mar. Sci., 61: 1186–1189 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Standal, D. Nuts and bolts in fisheries management—a technological approach to sustainable fisheries? Mar. Policy, 29: 255–263 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Standal, D. Institutional changes and fleet structure: towards the final solution? Mar. Policy, 31: 94–100 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Stefansson, G., and A. A. Rosenberg. Combining control measures for more effective management of fisheries under uncertainty: quotas, effort limitation and protected areas. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 360: 133–146 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, B. Efficiency changes in the Faroese pair-trawler fleet, pp. 33–43. In: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Vol 482. Economic Performance and Fishing Efficiency of Marine Capture Fisheries (Mitchell, R., Ed.). (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, J. T. Auxiliary and focal assessment models: a proof-of-concept involving time-varying catchability and fishery stock-status evaluation. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 68: 2264–2276 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tietze, U., W. Thiele, R. Lasch, B. Thomsen, and D. Rihan. Economic performance and fishing efficiency of marine capture fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 482, 68 pp. (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, C., Wilson, D. C. K., Nielsen, J. R., Bastardie, F., Reeves, S. A., Andersen, B. S., Eigaard, O. R. Challenges and opportunities for fleet- and métier-based approaches for fisheries management under the European Common Fishery Policy. Ocean Coast. Manage, 70: 38–47 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Valdemarsen, J. W. Technological trends in capture fisheries. Ocean Coast. Manage., 44: 635–651 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Valdemarsen, J. W., and P. Suuronen. Modifying fishing gear to achieve ecosystem objectives, pp. 321–341. In: Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem (Sinclair, M., and G. Valdimarsson, Eds.). Rome: FAO and CABI Publishing (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Van Oostenbrugge, J. A. E., J. J. Poos, W. L. T van Densen, and M. A. M. Machiels. In search of a better unit of effort in coastal lift net fishery with lights for small pelagics in Indonesia. Fish. Res., 59: 43–56 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, D. Technological change and marine fisheries development. Mar. Policy, 14: 15–22 (1990).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, D., C. A. Reid, C. Gulvin, and M. R. Dunn. Natural resource exploitation and the role of new technology: a case-history of the UK herring industry. Environ. Conserv., 22: 103–110 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Wilberg, M. J., J. T. Thorson, B. C. Linton, and J. Berkson. Incorporating time-varying catchability into population dynamic stock assessment models. Rev. Fish. Sci., 18: 7–24 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsson, D., T. Malm, and M. C. Öhman. The influence of offshore wind power on demersal fish. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63: 775–784 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar