A Review of Applications Evaluating Fisheries Management Scenarios through Marine Ecosystem Models

References

• Ainsworth CH, Schirripa MJ, Morzaria-Luna H. 2015. An Atlantis Ecosystem Model for the Gulf of Mexico supporting Integrated Ecosystem Assessment. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SEFSC-676, US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, California. p. 149. doi:https://doi.org/10.7289/V5X63JVH
   Google Scholar
• A’mar ZT, Punt AE, Dorn MW. 2010. Incorporating ecosystem forcing through predation into a management strategy evaluation for the Gulf of Alaska walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) fishery. Fish Res. 102(1–2):98–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TR. 2010. Progress in marine ecosystem modelling and the “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics. J Marine Syst. 81(1-2):4–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araùjo JN, Mackinson S, Ellis JR, Hart PJB. 2005. An Ecopath model of the western English Channel ecosystem with an exploration of its dynamic properties. Sci Ser Tech Rep. CEFAS Lowestoft 125:45.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Sánchez F. 2000. Modelación de flujos de biomasa en Centros de Actividad Biológica. In: Lluch Belda D, Elorduy-Garay J, Lluch-Cota SE, Ponce-Díaz G, editors. Bac: Centros de Actividad Biológica del Pacífico Mexicano, 1 ed. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C.; p. 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Sánchez F. 2002. Impact of harvesting strategies on fisheries and community structure on the Continental Shelf of the Campeche Sound, southern Gulf of Mexico. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Sánchez F, Calderón-Aguilera LE. 2002. Evaluating harvesting strategies for fisheries in the Central Gulf of California ecosystem. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Arreguín-Sánchez F, Zetina-Rejón M, Manickchand-Heileman S, Ramı́rez-Rodrı́guez M, Vidal L. 2004. Simulated response to harvesting strategies in an exploited ecosystem in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Ecol Model. 172(2-4):421–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audzijonyte A, Pethybridge H, Porobic J, Gorton R, Kaplan I, Fulton EA. 2019. Atlantis: a spatially explicit end-to-end marine ecosystem model with dynamically integrated physics, ecology and socio-economic modules. Methods Ecol Evol. 10(10):1814–1819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartell SM, Lefebvre G, Kaminski G, Carreau M, Campbell KR. 1999. An ecosystem model for assessing ecological risks in Québec rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. Ecol Model. 124(1):43–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00155-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley J, Howell D. 2004. An overview of Gadget, the Globally applicable Area-Disaggregated General Ecosystem Toolbox. Bergen, Norway: ICES Conference and Meeting Document ICES CM 2004/FF:13. p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Benson AJ, Stephenson RL. 2018. Options for integrating ecological, economic, and social objectives in evaluation and management of fisheries. Fish Fish. 19(1):40–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B, Pebesma E, Sumner M, Hijmans R, Rouault E, Warmerdam F, Ooms J, Rundel C. 2019. rgdal: bindings for the “Geospatial” Data Abstraction Library. R package version 1.4–3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard JL, Pinnegar JK, Mackinson S. 2002. Exploring marine mammal-fishery interactions using “Ecopath with Ecosim”: modelling the Barents Sea ecosystem. Sci Ser Tech Rep. Lowestoft, England: CEFAS Lowestoft. 117:52.
   Google Scholar
• Bogstad B, Gjøsaether H, Tjelmeland S. 1992. CapTool—a versatile aid in Barents Sea capelin catch quota options calculation. Working document to the 1992 meeting of the ICES Atlanto-Scandian Herring and Capelin Working Group. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES).
   Google Scholar
• Bracis C, Lehuta S, Savina-Rolland M, Travers-Trolet M, Girardin R. 2020. Improving confidence in complex ecosystem models: the sensitivity analysis of an Atlantis ecosystem model. Ecol Model. 431:109133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchary EA, Alder J, Nurhakim S, Wagey T. 2002. The use of ecosystem-based modelling to investigate multi-species management strategies for capture fisheries in the Bali Strait, Indonesia. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bundy A, Lilly GR, Shelton PA. 2000. A mass balance model of the Newfoundland-Labrador Shelf. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci. 2310:xiv + 157.
   Google Scholar
• Bustamante R, Dichmont C, Ellis N, Rochester W, Griffiths S, Rothlisberg P, Burford M, Dell Q, Tonks M, Lozano-Montes H, et al. 2011. Effects of trawling on the benthos and biodiversity: development and delivery of a spatially-explicit management framework for the Northern Prawn Fishery. Final report to the project FRDC 2005/050. Cleveland: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research; p. 382.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth DS, Cochrane KL, De Oliveira JAA. 1997. Management procedures: a better way to manage fisheries? The South African experience. In: Pikitch EK, Huppert DD, Sissenwine MP, editors. Global trends: fisheries management. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society; p. 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth DS, Harwood J. 1991. Report on the Benguela Ecology Programme Workshop on Seal-fishery Biological Interactions. Benguela Ecology Programme, Department Zoology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth DS, Plagányi ÉE. 2004. A brief introduction to some approaches to multispecies/ecosystem modelling in the context of their possible application in the management of South African fisheries. Afr J Mar Sci. 26(1):53–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/18142320409504049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth DS, Punt AE. 1999. Experiences in the evaluation and implementation of management procedures. ICES J Mar Sci. 56(6):985–998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth DS, Punt AE. 2003. The role of harvest control laws, risk and uncertainty and the precautionary approach in ecosystem-based management. In: Sinclair M, Valdimarsson G, editors. Responsible fisheries in the marine ecosystem. Wallingford: CABI; p. 311–319.
   Google Scholar
• Caddy JF, McGarvey R. 1996. Targets or limits for management of fisheries? N Am J Fish Manage.16(3):479–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1996)016 < 0479:TOLFMO > 2.3.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers TR, Hordyk AR. 2018. The Data-Limited Methods Toolkit (DLMtool): an R package for informing management of data-limited populations. Methods Ecol Evol. 9(12):2388–2388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Qiu YS, Jia XP. 2006. Quantitative model of trophic interactions in Beibu Gulf ecosystem in the northern South China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin. 25:116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Qiu Y, Jia X, Xu S. 2008. Simulating fisheries management options for the Beibu Gulf by means of an ecological modelling optimization routine. Fish Res. 89(3):257–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen V, Beattie A, Buchanan C, Ma H, Martell SJD, Latour RJ, Preikshot D, Sigrist MB, Uphoff JH, Walters CJ, et al. 2009. Fisheries ecosystem model of the Chesapeake Bay: methodology, parameterization, and model exploration. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO106. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, California. p. 146.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen V, Walters CJ. 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol Model. 172(2-4):109–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane KL, Butterworth DS, Oliveira JAAD, Roel BA. 1998. Management procedures in a fishery based on highly variable stocks and with conflicting objectives: experiences in the South African pelagic fishery. Rev Fish Biol Fisher. 8(2):177–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008894011847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collie JS, Botsford LW, Hastings A, Kaplan IC, Largier JL, Livingston PA, Plagányi É, Rose KA, Wells BK, Werner FE. 2016. Ecosystem models for fisheries management: finding the sweet spot. Fish Fish. 17(1):101–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constable AJ. 2001. The ecosystem approach to managing fisheries: achieving conservation objectives for predators of fished species. CCAMLR Sci. 8:37–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes R. 2004. Is grey literature ever used? Using citation analysis to measure the impact of GESAMP, an international marine scientific advisory body. Can J Inform Libr Sci. 28:45–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.29173/cais516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Mare WK. 1996. Some recent developments in the management of marine living resources. In: Floyd RB, Sheppard AW, Barro PJD, editors. Frontiers of population ecology. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; p. 599–616.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor CL, Johnston SJ, Brandão A, Rademeyer RA, Glazer JP, Furman LB, Butterworth DS. 2015. A review of the assessments of the major fisheries resources in South Africa. Afr J Mar Sci. 37(3):285–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2015.1070201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis DL, Bartell SM, Brenkert AL. 1989. Effects of nutrient recycling and food-chain length on resilience. Am Nat. 134(5):778–805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/285011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroba JJ, Gaichas SK, Lee M, Feeney RG, Boelke D, Irwin BJ. 2019. The dream and the reality: meeting decision-making time frames while incorporating ecosystem and economic models into management strategy evaluation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 76(7):1112–1133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroba JJ. 2014. Evaluating the consequences of adjusting fish stock assessment estimates of biomass for retrospective patterns using Mohn’s Rho. N Am J Fish Manage. 34(2):380–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2014.882452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichmont CM, Deng A, Punt AE, Ellis N, Venables WN, Kompas T, Ye Y, Zhou S, Bishop J. 2008. Beyond biological performance measures in management strategy evaluation: bringing in economics and the effects of trawling on the benthos. Fish Res. 94(3):238–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2008.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichmont CM, Deng A, Punt AE, Venables W, Haddon M. 2006. Management strategies for short-lived species: the case of Australia’s Northern Prawn Fishery: 1. Accounting for multiple species, spatial structure and implementation uncertainty when evaluating risk. Fish Res. 82(1-3):204–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2006.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichmont CM, Ellis N, Bustamante RH, Deng R, Tickell S, Pascual R, Lozano‐Montes H, Griffiths S. 2013. EDITOR’S CHOICE: evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives. J Appl Ecol. 50(4):1060–1070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichmont CM, Fulton EA, Gorton R, Sporcic M, Little LR, Punt AE, Dowling N, Haddon M, Klaer N, Smith DC. 2017. From data rich to data-limited harvest strategies—does more data mean better management? ICES J Mar Sci. 74(3):670–686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn M, Barbeaux S, Guttormsen M, Megrey B, Hollowed A, Brown E, Spalinger K. 2002. Assessment of Walleye Pollock in the Gulf of Alaska Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report for Groundfish Resources in the Gulf of Alaska. Anchorage, AK, USA: North Pacific Fishery Management Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling NA, Dichmont CM, Haddon M, Smith DC, Smith ADM, Sainsbury K. 2015a. Empirical harvest strategies for data-poor fisheries: a review of the literature. Fish Res. 171:141–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling NA, Dichmont CM, Haddon M, Smith DC, Smith ADM, Sainsbury K. 2015b. Guidelines for developing formal harvest strategies for data-poor species and fisheries. Fish Res. 171:130–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2014.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte LO, García CB 2002. Testing responses of a tropical shelf ecosystem to fisheries management strategies: a small-scale fishery from the Colombian Caribbean Sea. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis N, Pantus F, Welna A, Butler A. 2008. Evaluating ecosystem-based management options: effects of trawling in Torres Strait, Australia. Cont Shelf Res. 28(16):2324–2338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza-Tenorio A, Wolff M, Taylor MH, Espejel I. 2012. What model suits ecosystem-based fisheries management? A plea for a structured modeling process. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 22(1):81–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9224-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essington TE, Plagányi ÉE. 2014. Pitfalls and guidelines for “recycling” models for ecosystem-based fisheries management: evaluating model suitability for forage fish fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci. 71(1):118–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. 2002. 2002 Status Report. Anchorage, AK, USA: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 1996. Precautionary approach to fisheries. Part 1: guidelines on the precautionary approach to capture fisheries and species introductions - ScienceBase-Catalog. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2008. Fisheries management. 2. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. 2.1 Best practices in ecosystem modelling for informing an ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries. No. 4, Suppl. 2, Add. 1. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney RG, Boelke DV, Deroba JJ, Gaichas S, Irwin BJ, Lee M. 2019. Integrating management strategy evaluation into fisheries management: advancing best practices for stakeholder inclusion based on an MSE for Northeast US Atlantic herring. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 76(7):1103–1111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field JC, Francis RC, Aydin K. 2006. Top-down modeling and bottom-up dynamics: linking a fisheries-based ecosystem model with climate hypotheses in the Northern California Current. Prog Oceanogr. 68(2–4):238–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogarty MJ. 2014. The art of ecosystem-based fishery management. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 71(3):479–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier DA, Skaug HJ, Ancheta J, Ianelli J, Magnusson A, Maunder MN, Nielsen A, Sibert J. 2012. AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models. Optim Method Softw. 27(2):233–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10556788.2011.597854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis RICC, Shotton R. 1997. “Risk” in fisheries management: a review. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54:1699–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C, Olsen N, Taylor N, Grüss A, Batten S, Liu H, Verley P, Shin Y-J. 2017. Spatial and temporal dynamics of predator-prey species interactions off western Canada. ICES J Mar Sci. 74(8):2107–2119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Fuller M, Smith ADM, Punt AE. 2004a. Ecological indicators of the ecosystem effects of fishing: final report. Report No.: R99/1546. Hobart, Tas.//Canberra, ACT: CSIRO Div. of Marine Research//Australian Fisheries Management Authority. https://doi.org/10.4225/08/585c169120a95.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Parslow JS, Smith ADM, Johnson CR. 2004b. Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models II: the effect of physiological detail on model performance. Ecol Model. 173(4):371–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Punt AE, Dichmont CM, Gorton R, Sporcic M, Dowling N, Little LR, Haddon M, Klaer N, Smith DC. 2016. Developing risk equivalent data-rich and data-limited harvest strategies. Fish Res. 183:574–587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Punt AE, Dichmont CM, Harvey CJ, Gorton R. 2019. Ecosystems say good management pays off. Fish Fish. 20(1):66–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Sainsbury KJ, McDonald D, Hayes D, Lyne V, Little R, Fuller M, Condie S, Gray R, Scott R, et al. 2006. Management strategy evaluation specification for Australia’s North West Shelf. North West Shelf Joint Environmental Management Study. Technical Report No. 15. Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
   Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Johnson CR. 2004c. Biogeochemical marine ecosystem models I: IGBEM—a model of marine bay ecosystems. Ecol Model. 174(3):267–307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Punt AE. 2005. Which ecological indicators can robustly detect effects of fishing? ICES J Mar Sci. 62(3):540–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC, Johnson P. 2014. An integrated approach is needed for ecosystem based fisheries management: insights from ecosystem-level management strategy evaluation. PLoS One. 9(1):e84242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC. 2007. Alternative Management Strategies for Southeast Australian Commonwealth Fisheries: Stage 2: Quantitative Management Strategy Evaluation. Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
   Google Scholar
• Fulton EA, Smith T. 2002. Ecosim Case Study: Port Phillip Bay, Australia. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Gaichas S, Gamble R, Fogarty M, Benoît H, Essington T, Fu C, Koen-Alonso M, Link J. 2012. Assembly rules for aggregate-species production models: simulations in support of management strategy evaluation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 459:275–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary WL, Bode M, Doherty TS, Fulton EA, Nimmo DG, Tulloch AIT, Tulloch VJD, Ritchie EG. 2020. A guide to ecosystem models and their environmental applications. Nat Ecol Evol. 4(11):1459–1413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01298-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers TM, Pikitch EK, Frisk MG. 2016. An original model of the northern Gulf of Mexico using Ecopath with Ecosim and its implications for the effects of fishing on ecosystem structure and maturity. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 129:319–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2014.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geromont HF, De OJ, Johnston SJ, Cunningham CL. 1999. Development and application of management procedures for fisheries in southern Africa. ICES J Mar Sci. 56(6):952–966. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grafton RQ, Kompas T, McLoughlin R, Rayns N. 2007. Benchmarking for fisheries governance. Mar Policy. 31(4):470–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2006.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray R, Fulton EA, Little LR, Scott R. 2006. Ecosystem model specification within an agent based framework. North West Shelf Joint Environmental Management Study. Technical Report No. 16. Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
   Google Scholar
• Grüss A, Harford WJ, Schirripa MJ, Velez L, Sagarese SR, Shin Y-J, Verley P. 2016a. Management strategy evaluation using the individual-based, multispecies modeling approach OSMOSE. Ecol Model. 340:86–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüss A, Rose KA, Simons J, Ainsworth CH, Babcock EA, Chagaris DD, De Mutsert K, Froeschke J, Himchak P, Kaplan IC, et al. 2017. Recommendations on the use of ecosystem modeling for informing ecosystem-based fisheries management and restoration outcomes in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Coast Fish. 9(1):281–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2017.1330786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüss A, Schirripa MJ, Chagaris D, Drexler M, Simons J, Verley P, Shin Y-J, Karnauskas M, Oliveros-Ramos R, Ainsworth CH. 2015. Evaluation of the trophic structure of the West Florida Shelf in the 2000s using the ecosystem model OSMOSE. J Marine Syst. 144:30–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüss A, Schirripa MJ, Chagaris D, Velez L, Shin Y-J, Verley P, Oliveros-Ramos R, Ainsworth CH. 2016b. Estimating natural mortality rates and simulating fishing scenarios for Gulf of Mexico red grouper (Epinephelus morio) using the ecosystem model OSMOSE-WFS. J Marine Syst. 154:264–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guénette S, Heymans SJ, Christensen V, Trites AW. 2006. Ecosystem models show combined effects of fishing, predation, competition, and ocean productivity on Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63(11):2495–2517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f06-136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Fu C, Forrest RE, Olsen N, Liu H, Verley P, Shin Y-J. 2019. Ecosystem-based reference points under varying plankton productivity states and fisheries management strategies. ICES J Mar Sci. 76(7):2045–2059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Fu C, Olsen N, Xu Y, Grüss A, Liu H, Verley P, Shin Y-J. 2020. Incorporating environmental forcing in developing ecosystem-based fisheries management strategies. ICES J Mar Sci. 77(2):500–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen G, Hatlebakk E, Schweder T. 1998. Scenario Barents Sea a tool for evaluating fisheries management regimes. In: Rødseth T, editor. Models for multispecies management. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag Heidelberg; p. 173–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen C, Drinkwater KF, Jähkel A, Fulton EA, Gorton R, Skern-Mauritzen M. 2019. Sensitivity of the Norwegian and Barents Sea Atlantis end-to-end ecosystem model to parameter perturbations of key species. PLoS One. 14(2):e0210419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen C, Skern-Mauritzen M, van der Meeren G, Jähkel A, Drinkwater K. 2016. Set-up of the Nordic and Barents Seas (NoBa) Atlantis model. Havforskningsinstituttet. Bergen, Norway: Institute of Marine Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson S, Hjerne O, Harvey C, Kitchell JF, Cox SP, Essington TE. 2007. Managing Baltic Sea Fisheries under contrasting production and predation regimes: ecosystem model analyses. Ambio 36(2-3):265–271. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36. [265:MBSFUC]2.0.CO;22.0.co;2]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harford W, Gedamke T, Babcock E, Carcamo R, McDonald G, Wilson J. 2016. Management strategy evaluation of a multi-indicator adaptive framework for data-limited fisheries management. BMS. 92(4):423–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2016.1025
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield B, Thomas L, Scott R. 2006. Management strategy evaluations for multiple use management of Australia’s North West Shelf – visualisation software user guide and outline. North West Shelf Joint Environmental Management Study. Technical Report No. 17. Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
   Google Scholar
• Heymans JJ, Coll M, Link JS, Mackinson S, Steenbeek J, Walters C, Christensen V. 2016. Best practice in Ecopath with Ecosim food-web models for ecosystem-based management. Ecol Model. 331:173–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ. 2019. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 2.9-5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster. Version 3.0-7URL. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
   Google Scholar
• Hill KT, Crone PR, Dorval E, Macewicz BJ. 2015. Assessment of the Pacific sardine resource in 2015 for U.S.A. management in 2015-16. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-SWFSC-546. p. 168. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, California.
   Google Scholar
• Hill SL, Cannon M. 2013. A potential feedback approach to ecosystem-based management: model predictive control of the Antarctic krill fishery. CCAMLR Sci. 20:119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland DS. 2010. Management strategy evaluation and management procedures: tools for rebuilding and sustaining fisheries. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 25. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmd77jhvkjf-en
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Entomol Soc Can. 97(S45):5–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.4039/entm9745fv
   Google Scholar
• Howell D, Bogstad B. 2010. A combined Gadget/FLR model for management strategy evaluations of the Barents Sea fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci. 67(9):1998–2004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsq135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICES 2016a. Norway/Russia request for evaluation of harvest control rules for Northeast Arctic cod and haddock and for Barents Sea capelin. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee, 2016. ICES Advice 2016, Book 3, Section 3.4.1. ICES Special Request Advice.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2009. Report of the Arctic Fisheries Working Group (AFWG), April 21–27, 2009. Diane Lindemann: San-Sebastian, Spain. p. 579.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2011. Annex 5 - Report on key run for the North Sea Ecopath with Ecosim ecosystem Model, 1991 - 2007. Report of the Working Group on Multispecies Assessment Methods (WGSAM), October 10–14, 2011. ICES CM 2011/SSGSUE:10. Woods Hole, USA. p. 147–229.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2016b. Report of the second workshop on Management Plan Evaluation on Northeast Arctic cod and haddock and Barents Sea capelin (WKNEAMP-2), January 25–28, 2016. ICES CM 2016/ACOM:47.76. Kirkenes, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2016c. Report of the Working Group on Multispecies Assessment Methods (WGSAM), November 9–13, 2015. ICES CM 2015/SSGEPI:20. Woods Hole, USA. p. 206.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2019. Workshop on Guidelines for Management Strategy Evaluations (WKGMSE2). ICES Scientific Rep. 1:33–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5331
   Google Scholar
• IWC. 1993. Specification of the North Atlantic minke whaling trials. Rep Int Whal Commn. 43:371–382.
   Google Scholar
• IWC. 1994. The revised management procedure (RMP) for Baleen whales. Rep Int Whal Commn. 44:189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Gaichas SK, Stawitz CC, Lynch PD, Marshall KN, Deroba JJ, Masi M, Brodziak JKT, Aydin KY, Holsman K, et al. (in review). Management strategy evaluation: allowing the light on the hill to illuminate more than one species. Front Mar Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Hansen C, Morzaria-Luna HN, Girardin R, Marshall KN. 2020. Ecosystem-based harvest control rules for Norwegian and US Ecosystems. Front Mar Sci. 7:652. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00652
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Horne PJ, Levin PS. 2012. Screening California Current fishery management scenarios using the Atlantis end-to-end ecosystem model. Prog Oceanogr. 102:5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Koehn LE, Hodgson EE, Marshall KN, Essington TE. 2017. Modeling food web effects of low sardine and anchovy abundance in the California Current. Ecol Model. 359:1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan IC, Marshall KN. 2016. A guinea pig’s tale: learning to review end-to-end marine ecosystem models for management applications. ICES J Mar Sci. 73(7):1715–1724. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell LT, Mosqueira I, Grosjean P, Fromentin J-M, Garcia D, Hillary R, Jardim E, Mardle S, Pastoors MA, Poos JJ, et al. 2007. FLR: an open-source framework for the evaluation and development of management strategies. ICES J Mar Sci. 64(4):640–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishi MJ, Ito S, Megrey BA, Rose KA, Werner FE. 2011. A review of the NEMURO and NEMURO.FISH models and their application to marine ecosystem investigations. J Oceanogr. 67(1):3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-011-0009-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Surma S, Pitcher TJ, Varkey D, Lam ME, Ainsworth CH, Pakhomov E. 2016. An ecosystem model of the ocean around Haida Gwaii, Northern British Columbia: ecopath, ecosim and ecospace. Fish Cent Res Rep. 24:76. doi:https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0354480
   Google Scholar
• Lam M, Pitcher T, Surma S, Scott J, Kaiser M, White A, Pakhomov E, Ward L. 2019. Value- and ecosystem-based management approach: the Pacific herring fishery conflict. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 617–618:341–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin P, Fogarty M, Matlock G, Ernst M. 2008. Integrated ecosystem assessments. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-92. p. 20. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, California.
   Google Scholar
• Levin P, Fogarty M, Murawski S, Fluharty D. 2009. Integrated ecosystem assessments: developing the scientific basis for ecosystem-based management of the ocean. PLoS Biol. 7(1):e1000014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrøm U, Smout S, Howell D, Bogstad B. 2009. Modelling multi-species interactions in the Barents Sea ecosystem with special emphasis on minke whales and their interactions with cod, herring and capelin. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 56(21-22):2068–2079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link J, Ihde TF, Harvey CJ, Gaichas SK, Field JC, Brodziak JKT, Townsend HM, Peterman RM. 2012. Dealing with uncertainty in ecosystem models: the paradox of use for living marine resource management. Prog Oceanogr. 102:102–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link J. 2010a. Adding rigor to ecological network models by evaluating a set of pre-balance diagnostics: a plea for PREBAL. Ecol Model. 221(12):1580–1591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link J. 2010b. Ecosystem-based fisheries management: confronting tradeoffs. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little R, Fulton EA, Gray R, Hayes D, Lyne V, Scott R, Sainsbury KJ, McDonald D. 2006. Management strategy evaluation results and discussion for Australia’s North West Shelf. North West Shelf Joint Environmental Management Study. Technical Report No. 14. Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
   Google Scholar
• Mackinson S, Daskalov G. 2007. An ecosystem model of the North Sea to support an ecosystem approach to fisheries management: description and parameterisation. Sci Ser Tech Rep. 142:196.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinson S, Platts M, Buzowski J, Steenbeek J, Walters C, Hadeler S, Rossberg A, Garcia C, Lynam C. 2017. Management Strategy Evaluation toolkit for Ecopath with Ecosim (model output and technical report). UK: Cefas Laboratory. doi:https://doi.org/10.14466/CefasDataHub.44.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinson S, Platts M, Garcia C, Lynam C. 2018. Evaluating the fishery and ecological consequences of the proposed North Sea multi-annual plan. PLoS One. 13(1):e0190015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackinson S. 2000. Representing trophic interactions in the North Sea in the 1880s, using the Ecopath mass-balance approach. In: Guénette S, Christensen V, Pauly D, editors. Fisheries impacts on North Atlantic Ecosystems: Models and Analyses Fisheries Centre Research Reports. Vol. 9(4). p. 35–98. The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinson S. 2002. Simulating management options for the North Sea in the 1880s. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinson S. 2014. Combined analyses reveal environmentally driven changes in the North Sea ecosystem and raise questions regarding what makes an ecosystem model’s performance credible? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 71(1):31–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manickchand-Heileman S, Soto LA, Escobar E. 1998. A preliminary trophic model of the continental shelf, South-western Gulf of Mexico. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 46(6):885–899. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell SJD, Beattie AI, Walters CJ, Nayar T, Briese R. 2002. Simulating fisheries management strategies in the Strait of Georgia ecosystem using Ecopath and Ecosim In Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Masi MD, Ainsworth CH, Chagaris D. 2014. A probabilistic representation of fish diet compositions from multiple data sources: a Gulf of Mexico case study. Ecol Model. 284:60–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi MD, Ainsworth CH, Kaplan IC, Schirripa MJ. 2018. Interspecific interactions may influence reef fish management strategies in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar Coast Fish. 10(1):24–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mcf2.10001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi MD. 2016. An ecosystem-based approach to reef fish management in the Gulf of Mexico Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Tampa, Florida: University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald AD, Fulton EA, Little LR, Gray RC, Sainsbury KJ, Lyne VD. 2006. Multiple-use management strategy evaluation for coastal marine ecosystems using in vitro. In: Perez P, Batten D, editors. Complex science for a complex world: exploring human ecosystems with agents. Canberra, ACT, Australia: ANU E Press; p. 283–298.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald AD, Little LR, Gray R, Fulton E, Sainsbury KJ, Lyne VD. 2008. An agent-based modelling approach to evaluation of multiple-use management strategies for coastal marine ecosystems. Math Comput Simulat. 78(2-3):401–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methot RD, Wetzel CR. 2013. Stock synthesis: a biological and statistical framework for fish stock assessment and fishery management. Fish Res. 142:86–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morzaria-Luna HN, Ainsworth CH, Tarnecki JH, Grüss A. 2018. Diet composition uncertainty determines impacts on fisheries following an oil spill. Ecosyst Serv. 33:187–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazawa M. 2019. fmsb: functions for medical statistics book with some demographic data. R package version 0.6.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fmsb.
   Google Scholar
• Nsiku E. 2002. Exploration of management and conservation strategies for the multispecies fisheries of Lake Malawi using an ecosystem modelling approach. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nyamweya CS, Sturludottir E, Tomasson T, Taabu-Munyaho A, Njiru M, Stefansson G. 2017. Prediction of Lake Victoria’s response to varied fishing regimes using the Atlantis ecosystem model. Fish Res. 194:76–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell H, Grüss A, Sagarese SR, Babcock EA, Rose KA. 2017. Ecosystem modeling in the Gulf of Mexico: current status and future needs to address ecosystem-based fisheries management and restoration activities. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 27(3):587–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-017-9482-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura H, Ichinokawa M, Komori O. 2018. Ecosystem model in data-poor situations. In: Aoki I, Yamakawa T, Takasuka A, editors. Fish population dynamics, monitoring, and management: sustainable fisheries in the eternal ocean. Japan, Tokyo: Springer; p. 207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Okey TA, Pauly D. 1999a. Trophic mass-balance model of Alaska’s Prince William Sound Ecosystem, for the Post-Spill Period 1994-1996: 2nd Edition. Fish Cent Res Rep. (4). Vancouver: University of British Columbia. p. 138.
   Google Scholar
• Okey TA, Pauly D. 1999b. A mass-balanced model of trophic flows in Prince William Sound: decompartmentalizing ecosystem knowledge. In: Ecosystem approaches for fisheries management. Alaska Sea Grant: University of Alaska Fairbanks; p. 621–635. doi:https://doi.org/10.4027/eafm.1999.45
   Google Scholar
• Okey TA, Wright BA. 2004. Toward ecosystem-based extraction policies for Prince William Sound, Alaska: integrating conflicting objectives and rebuilding pinnipeds. B Mar Sci. 74:727–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okey TA. 2002. Simulating extreme fishing policies in Prince William Sound, Alaska: a preliminary evaluation of an ecosystem-based policy analysis tool. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 94–108.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen E, Fay G, Gaichas S, Gamble R, Lucey S, Link JS. 2016. Ecosystem model skill assessment. yes we can! PLoS One. 11(1):e0146467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly D, Christensen V, Walters C. 2000. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci. 57(3):697–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rodríguez A, Howell D, Casas M, Saborido-Rey F, Ávila-de Melo A. 2017. Dynamic of the Flemish Cap commercial stocks: use of a Gadget multispecies model to determine the relevance and synergies among predation, recruitment, and fishing. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 74(4):582–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2016-0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rodríguez A, Howell D, Umar I. 2019. EU SC05 project: “Multispecies Fisheries Assessment for NAFO.” Estimation of multispecies based HCRs and use of a multispecies MSE framework to assess the risk of collapse and the fishery-ecological trade-offs. Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, NAFO SCR Doc. 19/017.
   Google Scholar
• Pethybridge HR, Weijerman M, Perryman HA, Audzijonyte A, Porobic J, McGregor V, Girardin R, Bulman C, Ortega-Cisneros K, Sinerchia M, et al. 2019. Calibrating process-based marine ecosystem models: an example case using Atlantis. Ecol Model. 412:108822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.108822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikitch E, Boersma PD, Boyd I, Conover D, Cury P, Essington T, Heppell S, Houde E, Mangel M, Pauly D, et al. 2012. Little fish, big impact: managing a crucial link in ocean food webs. Washington, DC: Lenfest Ocean Program.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL. 2002. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: The Fisheries Centre, Cape Town, Africa: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Butterworth DS. 2006a. A Spatial Multi-species Operating Model (SMOM) of krill–predator interactions in small-scale management units in the Scotia Sea. Cape Town, Africa: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Butterworth D. 2006b. An illustrative management procedure for exploring dynamic feedback in krill catch limit allocations among small-scale management units. Cape Town, Africa: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Butterworth DS. 2007. A spatial multi-species operating model of the Antarctic Peninsula krill fishery and its impacts on land-breeding predators. Cape Town, Africa: University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Butterworth DS. 2012. The Scotia Sea krill fishery and its possible impacts on dependent predators: modeling localized depletion of prey. Ecol Appl. 22(3):748–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0441.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Punt AE, Hillary R, Morello EB, Thébaud O, Hutton T, Pillans RD, Thorson JT, Fulton EA, Smith ADM, et al. 2014. Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity. Fish Fish. 15(1):1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE, Rademeyer RA, Butterworth DS, Cunningham CL, Johnston SJ. 2007. Making management procedures operational—innovations implemented in South Africa. ICES J Mar Sci. 64(4):626–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE. 2007. Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 477. Rome
   Google Scholar
• Plagányi ÉE. 2016. Using simulation evaluation to account for ecosystem considerations in fisheries management. In: Edwards CTT, Dankel DJ, editors. Management science in fisheries: an introduction to simulation-based methods. New York, NY: Routledge; p. 298–318.
   Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Butterworth DS, de Moor CL, Oliveira JAAD, Haddon M. 2016a. Management strategy evaluation: best practices. Fish Fish. 17(2):303–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Butterworth DS. 1995. The effects of future consumption by the Cape fur seal on catches and catch rates of the Cape hakes. 4. Modelling the biological interaction between Cape fur seals Arctocephalus pusillus pusillus and the Cape hakes Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus. S Afr J Marine Sci. 16(1):255–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/025776195784156494
   Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Dunn A, Elvarsson BÞ, Hampton J, Hoyle SD, Maunder MN, Methot RD, Nielsen A. 2020. Essential features of the next-generation integrated fisheries stock assessment package: a perspective. Fish Res. 229:105617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt AE, MacCall AD, Essington TE, Francis TB, Hurtado-Ferro F, Johnson KF, Kaplan IC, Koehn LE, Levin PS, Sydeman WJ. 2016b. Exploring the implications of the harvest control rule for Pacific sardine, accounting for predator dynamics: a MICE model. Ecol Model. 337:79–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Siddeek MSM, Garber-Yonts B, Dalton M, Rugolo L, Stram D, Turnock BJ, Zheng J. 2012. Evaluating the impact of buffers to account for scientific uncertainty when setting TACs: application to red king crab in Bristol Bay, Alaska. ICES J Mar Sci. 69(4):624–634. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fss047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Smith ADM, Cui G. 2001. Defining robust harvest strategies, performance indicators and monitoring strategies for the SEF. FRDC Project 98/102. Hobart: Fisheries Research & Development Corporation & CSIRO Marine Research.
   Google Scholar
• Punt AE, Smith ADM. 1999. Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern stock of gemfish (Rexea solandri). ICES J Mar Sci. 56(6):860–875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rademeyer RA, Butterworth DS, Plagányi ÉE. 2008. A history of recent bases for management and the development of a species-combined Operational Management Procedure for the South African hake resource. Afr J Mar Sci. 30(2):291–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/AJMS.2008.30.2.8.558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademeyer RA, Plagányi ÉE, Butterworth DS. 2007. Tips and tricks in designing management procedures. ICES J Mar Sci. 64(4):618–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury KJ, Campbell RA, Lindholm R, Whitelaw AW. 1997. Experimental management of an Australian multi-species fishery: examining the possibility of trawl-induced habitat modification. In: Pikitch EK, Huppert DD, Sissenwine MP, editors. Global trends: fisheries management: proceedings of the symposium. Maryland, USA: American Fisheries Society; p. 107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sainsbury KJ, Punt AE, Smith ADM. 2000. Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J Mar Sci. 57(3):731–741. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury KJ. 1991. Application of an experimental approach to management of a tropical multispecies fishery with highly uncertain dynamics. ICES Mar Sci Symp. 193:301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Schnute JT, Maunder MN, Ianelli JN. 2007. Designing tools to evaluate fishery management strategies: can the scientific community deliver? ICES J Mar Sci. 64(6):1077–1084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweder T, Hagen GS, Hatlebakk E. 1998. On the effect on cod and herring fisheries of returning the Revised Management Procedure for minke whaling in the greater Barents Sea. Fish Res. 37(1-3):77–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00128-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweder T, Hagen GS, Hatlebakk E. 2000. Direct and indirect effects of minke whale abundance on cod and herring fisheries: a scenario experiment for the Greater Barents Sea. NAMMCOSP. 2:120–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.7557/3.2976
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). 2015. Evaluation of management plans: evaluation of the multi-annual plan for the North Sea demersal stocks (STECF-15-04). EUR 27232 EN, JRC 95959. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Shin Y-J, Cury P. 2001. Exploring fish community dynamics through size-dependent trophic interactions using a spatialized individual-based model. Aquat Living Resour. 14(2):65–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0990-7440(01)01106-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Y-J, Houle JE, Akoglu E, Blanchard JL, Bundy A, Coll M, Demarcq H, Fu C, Fulton EA, Heymans JJ, Salihoglu B, et al. 2018. The specificity of marine ecological indicators to fishing in the face of environmental change: a multi-model evaluation. Ecol Indic. 89:317–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skern‐Mauritzen M, Ottersen G, Handegard NO, Huse G, Dingsør GE, Stenseth NC, Kjesbu OS. 2016. Ecosystem processes are rarely included in tactical fisheries management. Fish Fish. 17(1):165–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ADM, Fulton E, Hobday AJ, Smith DC, Shoulder P. 2007. Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci. 64(4):633–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ADM, Sachse ML, Smith DC, Prince JD, Knuckey IA, Baelde P, Walker TJ, Talman S. 2004. Alternative management strategies for the Southern and Eastern Scalefish and Shark Fishery – qualitative assessment report. Canberra: Australian Fisheries Management Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Smith ADM, Sainsbury KJ, Stevens RA. 1999. Implementing effective fisheries-management systems – management strategy evaluation and the Australian partnership approach. ICES J Mar Sci. 56(6):967–979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ADM, Ward TM, Hurtado N, Klaer N, Fulton EA, Punt AE. 2015a. Review and update of harvest strategy settings for the Commonwealth Small Pelagic Fishery - Single species and ecosystem considerations. Final Report of FRDC Project No. 2013/028. Hobart: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Smith ADM. 1994. Management strategy evaluation – the light on the hill. In: Hancock DA, editor. Population dynamics for fisheries management. Perth: Australian Society for Fish Biology; p. 249–253.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Fulton EA, Day RW, Shannon LJ, Shin Y-J. 2015b. Ecosystem modelling in the southern Benguela: comparisons of Atlantis, Ecopath with Ecosim, and OSMOSE under fishing scenarios. Afr J Mar Sci. 37(1):65–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2015.1013501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stäbler M, Kempf A, Mackinson S, Poos JJ, Garcia C, Temming A. 2016. Combining efforts to make maximum sustainable yields and good environmental status match in a food-web model of the southern North Sea. Ecol Model. 331:17–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stäbler M, Kempf A, Temming A. 2014. Potatoes of opportunity for fishing in the southern North Sea: using Ecopath with Ecosim to identify MSY and GES options. Fish Cent Res Rep. 22:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbeek J, Buszowski J, Christensen V, Akoglu E, Aydin K, Ellis N, Felinto D, Guitton J, Lucey S, Kearney K, et al. 2016. Ecopath with Ecosim as a model-building toolbox: source code capabilities, extensions, and variations. Ecol Model. 319:178–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surma S, Pitcher TJ, Kumar R, Varkey D, Pakhomov EA, Lam ME. 2018. Herring supports Northeast Pacific predators and fisheries: insights from ecosystem modelling and management strategy evaluation. PLoS One. 13(7):e0196307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surma S. 2019. Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasii) Trophodynamics and Fisheries in the Northeast Pacific Ocean Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnecki JH, Wallace AA, Simons JD, Ainsworth CH. 2016. Progression of a Gulf of Mexico food web supporting Atlantis ecosystem model development. Fish Res. 179:237–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MH, Wolff M, Vadas F, Yamashiro C. 2008. Trophic and environmental drivers of the Sechura Bay ecosystem (Peru) over an ENSO cycle. Helgol Mar Res. 62(S1):15–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10152-007-0093-4
   Google Scholar
• Thomson RB, Butterworth DS, Boyd IL, Croxall JP. 2000. Modeling the consequences of Antarctic krill harvesting on Antarctic fur seals. Ecol Appl. 10(6):1806–1819. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1806:MTCOAK]2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe RB, De Oliveira JAA. 2019. Comparing conceptual frameworks for a fish community MSY (FCMSY) using management strategy evaluation—an example from the North Sea. ICES J Mar Sci. 76(4):813–823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe RB, Jennings S, Dolder PJ. 2017. Risks and benefits of catching pretty good yield in multispecies mixed fisheries. ICES J Mar Sci. 74(8):2097–2106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe RB, Quesne WJFL, Luxford F, Collie JS, Jennings S. 2015. Evaluation and management implications of uncertainty in a multispecies size-structured model of population and community responses to fishing. Methods Ecol Evol. 6(1):49–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjelmeland S, Bogstad B. 1998. MULTSPEC – a review of a multispecies modelling project for the Barents Sea. Fish Res. 37(1-3):127–142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(98)00132-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trites AW, Livingston PA, Vasconcellos MC, Mackinson S, Springer AM, Pauly D. 1999. Ecosystem considerations and the limitations of ecosystem models in fisheries management: insights from the Bering Sea. In: Ecosystem Approaches for Fisheries Management. Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Sea Grant College Program AK-SG-99-01. p. 609–619 doi:https://doi.org/10.4027/eafm.1999.44
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. United Nations General Assembly: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Draft resolution referred to the United Nations summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda by the General Assembly at its sixty-ninth session. United Nations, General Assembly, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos M, Heymans J, Bundy A. 2002. The use of Ecosim to investigate multispecies harvesting strategies for capture fisheries of the Newfoundland-Labrador shelf. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 68–72.
   Google Scholar
• Walters CJ, Christensen V, Pauly D. 2002. Searching for optimum fishing strategies for fishery development, recovery and sustainability. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Walters CJ, Martell SJD, Korman J. 2006. A stochastic approach to stock reduction analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63(1):212–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f05-213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters CJ. 2004. Simple representation of the dynamics of biomass error propagation for stock assessment models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 61(7):1061–1065. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H. 2016. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yu G. 2019. scatterpie: scatter Pie Plot. R package version 0.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=scatterpie.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller D, Freire K. 2002. A preliminary North-East Atlantic marine ecosystem model: the Faroe Islands and ICES Area Vb. In: Pitcher TJ, Cochrane KL, editors. The use of ecosystem models to investigate multispecies management strategies for capture fisheries. Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Fisheries Centre Research Reports; p. 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zetina-Rejón MJ, Arreguín-Sánchez F, Chávez EA. 2001. Using an ecosystem modeling approach to assess the management of a Mexican coastal lagoon system. Cal Coop Ocean Fish. 42:88–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zetina-Rejón MJ. 2000. Influencia de la Pesca de Camarón en la Estructura Del Ecosistema Lagunar Huizache-Caimanero Sinaloa, México [MS thesis]. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas-IPN.
   Google Scholar