Developing CBDR-RC indices for fair allocation of emission reduction responsibilities and capabilities across countriesFootnote^†

^†The views, findings and conclusions expressed in this article are entirely those of the author and do not represent the views of the institution he is affiliated with.

References

• Abson, D. J., Dougill, A. J., & Stringer, L. C. (2012). Using principal component analysis for information-rich socio-ecological vulnerability mapping in Southern Africa. Applied Geography, 35, 515–524. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E., & Stavins, R. N. (2012). Climate negotiations open a window: Key implications of the durban platform for enhanced action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ari, I., & Sari, R. (2015). The comparison of G-20 countries in terms of climate change indicators. Energy Dipl Journal, 1, 14–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, J., & Wang, X. (2003). Equity and climate. In Principle and practice (pp. 61–84). Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M. A. (2002). Equal per capita entitlements: A Key to Global Participation on Climate Change?, In K. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa, & J. F. P. (Eds.), Building on the Kyoto protocol: Options for protecting the climate (pp. 175–201). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, P., Kartha, S., Athanasiou, T., & Kemp-Benedict, E. (2008). The greenhouse development rights framework, climate and development. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Christian Aid, EcoEquity and the Stockholm Environment Institute. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2009.0010
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Scott, K., Lenzen, M., Roelich, K., & Le Quéré, C. (2013). Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: A UK case study. Climate Policy, 13, 451–470. doi:10.1080/14693062.2013.788858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basic. (2007). The Sao Paulo proposal for an agreement on future climate policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2012). The durban platform negotiations: Work stream one.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (2015). Reflections on the Paris conference [WWW Document]. Retrieved December 23, 2015 from http://opiniojuris.org/2015/12/15/reflections-on-the-paris-conference/
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D., Chou, S., & Jorge-tresolini, C. (2004). International climate efforrts beyond 2012: A survey of approaches. Washington, DC: Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• C2ES. (2015). Outcomes of the UN climate change conference in Paris [WWW Document]. Retrieved December 20, 2015 from http://www.c2es.org/international/negotiations/cop21-paris/summary
   Google Scholar
• Csutora, M., & Vetőné mózner, Z. (2014). Proposing a beneficiary-based shared responsibility approach for calculating national carbon accounts during the post-Kyoto era. Climate Policy, 14, 599–616. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.905442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, T., Röser, F., Tewari, R., Kuramochi, T., Warnecke, C., Hagemann, M., … Höhne, N. (2015). What the Paris agreement means for global climate change mitigation [WWW Document]. Retrieved December 22, 2015 from http://newclimate.org/2015/12/14/what-the-paris-agreement-means-for-global-climate-change-mitigation/
   Google Scholar
• Dobbie, M. J., & Dail, D. (2013). Robustness and sensitivity of weighting and aggregation in constructing composite indices. Ecological Indicators, 29, 270–277. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. K. (2009). Copenhagen: Climate of mistrust. Economic and Political Weekly, xliv, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Kadner, S., Minx, J. C., Brunner, S., … Zwickel, T. (2014). Technical summary. In: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurbaey, M., Kartha, S., Bolwig, S., Chee, Y. L., Chen, Y., Corbera, E., … Sagar, A. (2014). Sustainable development and equity. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, in: climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change (pp. 283–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment.10.1787/18151965
   Google Scholar
• Füssel, H.-M. (2010). How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessment. Global Environmental Change, 20, 597–611. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science (80-.), 162, 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. G. (2010). World ethics and climate change: From international to Glbal justice. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heyward, M. (2007). Equity and international climate change negotiations: A matter of perspective. Climate Policy, 7, 518–534.10.1080/14693062.2007.9685674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, R. (2006). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.10.1201/9781420011111
   Google Scholar
• Iddri. (2015). The Paris agreement: Historic! what’s next? [WWW Document]. Retrieved December 22, 2015 from http://www.blog-iddri.org/2015/12/14/the-paris-agreement-historic-but-whats-next/
   Google Scholar
• IEA. (2013). Renewables information-2013. Paris Cedex.
   Google Scholar
• IISD. (2012). Summary of the Doha climate change conference: 26 November–8 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2011). IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation, choice reviews online. Cambridge: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.49-6309
   Google Scholar
• Karousakis, K., Guay, B., & Philibert, C. (2008). Differentiating countries in terms of mitigation commitments, actions and support. IEA: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kokoni, S., & Skea, J. (2013). Input–output and life-cycle emissions accounting: Applications in the real world. Climate Policy, 14, 1–25. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.864190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstad, C., Urama, K., Broome, J., Bruvoll, A., Olvera, M.C., Fullerton, D., … Mundaca, L., 2014. Social, economic and ethical concepts and methods. In Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, in: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change (pp. 207–282). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattoo, A., & Subramanian, A. (2012). Equity in climate change: An analytical review. World Development, 40, 1083–1097. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, B., & Mahadeva, L. (2013). The oxford approach: Operationalising “respective capabilities”. European Capacity Building Initiative.10.26889/9781907555688
   Google Scholar
• Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffmann, A., Giovanni, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. P. (2008). From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecological Economics, 65, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rive, N., & Fuglestvedt, J. (2008). Introducing population-adjusted historical contributions to global warming. Global Environmental Change, 18, 142–152. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schar, C., Vidale, P. L., Luthi, D., Frei, C., Haberli, C., Liniger, M. A., & Appenzeller, C. (2004). The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature, 427, 3926–3928. doi:10.1038/nature02230.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom, 1st ed. Anchor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavins, R. N., & Stowe, R. C. (2016). The Paris agreement and beyond: International climate change policy post-2020. Cambridge: Harvard Project on Climate.
   Google Scholar
• Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., & Allen, M. R. (2004). Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature, 432, 2–6. doi:10.1029/2001JB001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ul-Saufie, A. Z., Yahaya, A. S., Ramli, N. A., Rosaida, N., & Hamid, H. A. (2013). Future daily PM10 concentrations prediction by combining regression models and feedforward backpropagation models with principle component analysis (PCA). Atmospheric Environment, 77, 621–630. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2014). Open working group proposal for sustainable development goals.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (1992). United nations framework convention.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2012). Decisions adopted by the COP-17. Author.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement [WWW Document]. Retrieved December 14, 2015 from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USGCRP. (2017). Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment. D. J. Wuebbles, D. W. Fahey, K. A. Hibbard, D. J. Dokken, B. C. Stewart, & T. K. Maycock (Eds.), U.S. Global Change Research Program (vol. I, p. 470). Washington, DC, USA. doi:10.7930/J0J964J6
   Google Scholar
• Verma, J. P. (2013). Data analysis in management with SPSS software. Springer India. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-0786-3
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y.-M., Zou, L., Wang, K., Yi, W., & Wang, L. (2013). Review of proposals for an agreement on future climate policy : Perspectives from the responsibilities for GHG reduction. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2, 161–168. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbach, D. (2010). Negligence, strict liability, and responsibility for climate change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T. (2009). Editorial: Carbon footprint and input–output analysis – An introduction. Economic Systems Research, 21, 175–186. doi:10.1080/09535310903541256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, H., Baumert, K., Blanchard, O., Burch, S., & Robinson, J. (2007). What factors influence mitigative capacity? Energy Policy, 35, 692–703.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRI. (2014). Climate analysis indicators tool (CAIT 2.0) [WWW Document]. GHG Emissions. Retrieved December 27, 2014 from http://cait2.wri.org/wri/Country
   Google Scholar
• Younus, M. A. F. (2017a). An assessment of vulnerability and adaptation to cyclones through impact assessment guidelines: A bottom-up case study from Bangladesh coast. Natural Hazards, 89, 1437–1459. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-3027-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younus, M. A. F. (2017b). Adapting to climate change in the coastal regions of Bangladesh : Proposal for the formation of community-based adaptation committees. Environmental Hazards, 16, 21–49. doi:10.1080/17477891.2016.1211984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar