Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy

References

• Bellon, J. (2000). A research based justification for debate across the curriculum. Argumentation and Advocacy, 36, 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Berdine, R. (1987). Increasing student involvement in the learning process through debate on controversial topics. Journal of Marketing Education, 9, 6–8.10.1177/027347538700900303
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C, & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice. AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, K., & Biggers, T. (1985). Why should we support debate? Journal of the American Forensic Association, 21, 237–240.
   Google Scholar
• Combs, H., & Bourne, S. (1994). The renaissance of educational debate: Results of a five-year study of the use of debate in business education. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Crone, J. (1997). Using panel debates to increase student involvement in the introductory sociology class. Teaching Sociology, 25, 214–218.10.2307/1319397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, L. S. (2013). Reducing the confirmation bias in the college classroom. San Diego, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://www.neo-philosophy.com/ReducingtheConfirmationBias(Cuddy).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curry, R., & Makoul, G. (1996). An active-learning approach to basic clinical skills. Academic Medicine, 71, 41–44.10.1097/00001888-199601000-00016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber, C. (1989). Debate as empowerment. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 25, 205–207.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, L. (1993). Using debates to teach the psychology of women. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 35–38.10.1207/s15328023top2001_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32, 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, K., & Shanta, L. (2001). Empowering versus enabling in academia. Journal of Nursing Education, 40, 342–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, M., Lim, H., Schannae, L., & Meadows, R. (2015). Learning by doing: Experiential learning in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26, 471–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. (1992). Improving the quality of student learning. Bristol: Technical & Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2004). Using debating to teach about controversial drug issues. American Journal of Health Education, 35, 52–53.10.1080/19325037.2004.10603606
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, M., & Holloway, M. (2005). The debate as a pedagogic tool in social policy for social work students. Social Work Education, 24, 617–637.10.1080/02615470500182132
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D., & Buzwell, S. (2013). The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14, 37–49.10.1177/1469787412467123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemenway, D., & Solnick, S. (2013). A classroom game on sequential enforcement. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24, 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 225–236.10.1177/1469787409343186
   Google Scholar
• Lamphere, R. D., Shumpert, N. M., & Clevenger, S. L. (2015). Topping the classroom charts: Teaching criminological theory using. Popular Music, 26, 530–544.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. (1995). Active-learning exercises for consumer behavior courses. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 200–202.10.1207/s15328023top2203_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. C. M., & Wu, J.. (2015). Active learning for discovery and innovation in criminology with Chinese learners. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/271603276
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87, 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Misale, J., Gillette, D., & delMas, R. (1996). An interdisciplinary, computer-centered approach to active learning. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 181–184.10.1177/009862839602300311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 174–220.
   Google Scholar
• Rockell, B. (2009). Challenging what they all know: Integrating the real/reel world into criminal justice pedagogy. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20, 75–92.10.1080/10511250802680373
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. W. (1986). Teaching criminology. Teaching sociology, 14, 257–262.10.2307/1318383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruël, G. C., Nauta, A., Bastiaans, N. (2003). Free-riding and team performance in project education. s. n.Retrieved from http://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/3010481/03a42.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, J. (2016). Teaching about social loafing: The accounting team exercise. Management Teaching Review, 1, 34–42.10.1177/2379298115621889
   Google Scholar
• Semlak, W., & Shields, D. (1977). The effect of debate training on students participation in the bicentennial youth debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 192–196.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. P. (2013). Reinforcing experiential learning in criminology: Definitions, rationales, and missed opportunities concerning prison tours in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24, 50–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, L. M., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Exploring the relationship between 21st century competencies and core science content. For the Research on 21st Century Competencies, National Research Council. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/Core_Science_and_21st_Century_Competencies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, L. (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 740–763.10.1353/jhe.2002.0056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. M., & Brewster. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of team-based learning in undergraduate criminal justice courses. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26, 446–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumposky, N. (2004). The debate debate. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78, 52–56.10.3200/TCHS.78.2.52-56
   Google Scholar
• Vander Kooi, G. P., & Palmer, L. B. (2014). Problem-based learning for police academy students: Comparison of those receiving such instruction with those in traditional programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25, 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. (2013). Deeper learning defined. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/library/hewlett-foundation-publication/deeper-learning-defined
   Google Scholar