General intelligence, emotional intelligence and academic knowledge as predictors of creativity domains: A study of gifted students

References

• Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 329–337.10.1207/s15326934crj1204_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35–46. doi:10.1080/10400419409534507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00767.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (2003). The impact of the core knowledge curriculum on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 297–300. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113–117. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallised intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batey, M., Furnham, A., & Safiullina, X. (2010). Intelligence, general knowledge and personality as predictors of creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 532–535. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447–457. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolindifar, S., & Noordin, N. (2013). Investigating the relationship between creativity and academic achievement of Malaysian undergraduates. Jurnal Teknologi (Social Science), 65, 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Candrasekaran, S. (2013). Creativity and academic achievement of higher secondary school students in Tamilnadu. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 3, 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, D. W. (2000). Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 11, 69–82. doi:10.1080/713669176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, C., & Snelbecker, G. (2007). General, artistic and scientific creativity attributes of engineering and music students. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 213–225. doi:10.1080/10400410701397271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 385–389. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K., Christodoulou, C., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2012). The theory of multiple intelligences. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of ıntelligence (pp. 485–503). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, M. E., Özer, E., & Işık, E. (2013). Duygusal Zekâ Özelliği Ölçeği-Kısa Formu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Trait emotional ıntelligence questionnaire-short form: Validity and reliability studies]. Education and Science, 38, 407–419.
   Google Scholar
• Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Ruf, H. (2005). Primary school teachers’ criteria for the ıdentification of gifted pupils. High Ability Studies, 16, 219–228. doi:10.1080/13598130600618140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eunsook, H., & Milgram, R. M. (2010). Creative thinking ability: Domain generality and specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 272–287. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.503535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10692-000
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2015). The bright and dark side correlates of creativity: Demographic, ability, personality traits and personality disorders associated with divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 39–46. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.992676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–617. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060–1069. doi:10.1016/J.Paid.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligence for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS−SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A. (1991). The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinal study. European Journal of High Ability, 2, 174–188.10.1080/0937445910020207
   Google Scholar
• Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18, 209–234. doi:10.1080/13598130701709541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson, R. (1996). A in search of the creative personality. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, M. (2001). An application of amabile's consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children's musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234–244. doi:10.2307/3345709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25–40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivcevic, Z., & Mayer, J. D. (2009). Mapping dimensions of creativity in the life-space. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 152–165. doi:10.1080/10400410902855259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, K. N., Moon, S. M., & French, B. (2011). Differential effects of divergent thinking, domain knowledge, and interest on creative performance in art and math. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 60–71. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.545750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karolyi, C. V., Ramos-Ford, V., & Gardner, H. (2003). Multiple intelligences: A perspective on giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 100−112). Boston, MA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298–308. doi:10.1037/a0029751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004a). Sure, i'm creative—but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155. doi:10.2190/26HQ-VHE8-GTLN-BJJM
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004b). The amusement park theoretical model of creativity. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 14, 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., Evans, M., & Baer, J. (2010). The American idol effect: Are students good judges of their creativity across domains? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 3–17. doi:10.2190/EM.28.1.b
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta–analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta–analyses of big six interests and big five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217–239. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olatoye, R. A., Akintunde, S. O., & Ogunsanya, E. A. (2010). Relationship between creativity and academic achievement of business administration students in South Western Polytechnics. Nigeria. African Research Journal, 4, 134–149
   Google Scholar
• Oral, G., Kaufman, J. C., & Agars, M. D. (2007). Examining creativity in Turkey: Do Western findings apply? High Ability Studies, 18, 235–246. doi:10.1080/13598130701709590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V. (2011). Ability and trait emotional intelligence. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, A. Furnham, & S. von Stumm (Eds.), The blackwell–wiley handbook of individual differences (pp. 656–678). New York, NY: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781444343120.ch25
   Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2000). On the dimensional structure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 313–320. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99),00195-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2001). Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 425–448. doi:10.1002/per.416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (2010). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, D. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2004). Do standardized tests penalize deep-thinking, creative, or conscientious students? Some personality correlates of Graduate Record Examinations test scores. Intelligence, 32, 145–153. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preckel, F., Holling, H., & Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non–gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 159–170. doi:10.1080/10400410409534553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2007). Validating the creativity scale for diverse domains using groups of artists and scientists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 163–172.10.2190/Q538-2307-2627-1256
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, B. O. (1966). Creativity in monozygotic and dyzygotic’ twins ( ERIC Number: ED109580). Retrieved June 25, 2015, from ERIC http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED109580.
   Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, E. F., Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2007). Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 933–946. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361–368. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, F. (2014). Yaratıcılık–zeka ilişkisi: Yeni deliller [Relationship of creativity and intelligence: New evidence]. İlköğretim Online Journal, 13, 1516–1530. doi:10.17051/io.2014.02374
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, F. (2015). A Research on the structure of intelligence and creativity, and creativity style. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 5, 2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, F. (2016). Kaufman Alanları Yaratıcılılık Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Adaptation of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties]. Elementary Education Online, 15, 855–867. doi:10.17051/io.2016.70479
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, F., & Şahin, D. (2012). Engelli bireylerle çalışan özel eğitim öğretmenlerinin tükenmişlik düzeyinin belirlenmesi [Examining the burn-out level of special education teachers working with disabled individuals]. Öğretmen Eğitimi ve Eğitimcileri Dergisi, 2, 275–294.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, F., & Şahin, D. (2013). Bilim ve sanat merkezinde çalışan öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeyi [Examining the burn-out levels of talented students teachers working at science-arts centres]. Üstün Yeteneklilerin Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, F., Özer, E., & Deniz, M. E. (2016). The predictive level of emotional intelligence for the domain–specific creativity: A study on gifted students. Education and Science, 41, 181–197. doi:10.15390/EB.2016.4576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2004). A synthesis of research on psychological types of gifted adolescents. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 15, 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2009). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programları [Gifted education programs]. Ankara: Maya Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U., & Ayas, B. (2013). Creative scientific ability test (C–SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55, 316–329.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Ruiz, M. J., Hernández-Torrano, D., Pérez-González, J. C., Batey, M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). The relationship between trait emotional intelligence and creativity across subject domains. Motivation and Emotion, 35, 461–473. doi:10.1007/s11031-011-9227-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. L. (2008). Creativity and intelligence revisited: A latent variable analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965). Creativity Research Journal, 20, 34–39. doi:10.1080/10400410701841807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self–report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19–34.10.1037/a0024071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01254.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The big five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208–232. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.10.1159/000277029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S., Soysal, Ş., Aldemir, S., & Işık, B. (2012). Üstün zeka düzeyindeki bir grup öğrencinin WISC–R profillerinin incelenmesi [A group of students at the level of gifted investigation of WISC–R profiles]. Yeni Tıp Dergisi, 29, 170–173.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1976). Genetic studies of genius: Volume IV, the gifted child grows up twenty–five years’ follow–up of a superior group, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (2008). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms–technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Virgolim, A. M. R. (2005). Criatividade e inteligencia: Um estudo com alunos superdotados brasileiros [Creativity and intelligence: A study with Brazilian students] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Wallbrown, F. H., Wallbrown, J. D., & Wherry, R. J. (1975). The construct validity of the wallach-kogan creativity test for ınner-city children. The Journal of General Psychology, 92, 83–96.10.1080/00221309.1975.9711330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B. (2008). The role of domain knowledge in creative generation. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. (2005). Comparing the intelligence and creativity scores of Asian American gifted students with Caucasian gifted students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
   Google Scholar