12,388
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Gifted education in India

| (Reviewing Editor) & (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1332815 | Accepted 16 May 2016, Published online: 15 Jun 2017

References

  • Agarwal, D. K. , Upadhyay, S. K. , & Agarwal, K. N. (1989). Influence of malnutrition on cognitive development assessed by piagetian tasks. Acta Paediatrica , 78 , 115–122. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb10897.x
  • Badrinath, S. , & Satyanarana, S. B. (1979). Correlates of creative thinking of high school students. Creativity Newsletter , 7 , 1–2.
  • Bawa, S. K. , & Kaur, P. (1995). Creativity and academic achievement. Psycho-Lingua , 25 , 133–136.
  • Behera, S. (1998). Impact of academic achievement and school background on creativity. The progress of Education , 122 , 260–262.
  • Besançon, M. (2013). Creativity, Giftedness and Education. Gifted and Talented International , 28 , 149–161. doi:10.1080/15332276.2013.11678410
  • Bharaj, M. (2013). Multidimensional study of intellectually gifted adolescents. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices , 3 (1), 1–15.
  • Bhargava, S. (1992). Achievement motivation and creativity in relation to locus of control of socio-culturally deprived and non-deprived adolescents (PhD in Education). Agra University, Agra.
  • Bhatnagar, A. , & Gulati, S. (1998). Career development of creative girls . New Delhi: Vikas Publications.
  • Bhawalkar, S. (1992). Prediction of scientific creativity through cognitive and affective variables among high school students . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya, Indore.
  • Bhawuk, D. P. S. (2003). Culture’s influence on creativity: The case of Indian spirituality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations , 27 (1), 1–22.10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00059-7
  • Census of India . (2011). Retrieved from http://censusindia.gov.in
  • Chadha, M. K. , & Chandana, S. (1990). Creativity, intelligence and scholastic achievement : A residual study. Indian Educational Review , 25 , 81–85.
  • Chaurasia, O. (1993). Family functioning and creative abilities. Perspectives in Psychological Researches , 16 , 61–63.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dai, D. Y. , & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly , 57 , 151–168.10.1177/0016986213490020
  • Dai, D. Y. , & Rinn, A. N. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond effect: What do we know and where do we go from here? Education Psychological Review , 20 , 287–317.
  • Das, J. P. (1994). Eastern views of intelligence. Encyclopedia of Intelligence (pp. 91– 97). New York, NY: MacMillan.
  • Das, J. P. , & Thapa, K. (2000). Intelligence and cognitive processes. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India (pp. 151–207). New Delhi: Sage.
  • Department of Education and Child Development . (2012). Annual report . Australia: Government of Australia.
  • Dutta Chowdhury, S. , & Ghosh, T. (2011). Nutritional and socioeconomic status in cognitive development of Santal children of Purulia district, India. Annals of Human Biology , 38 , 188–193. doi:10.3109/03014460.2010.506887
  • Feldman, D. H. (1982). A developmental framework for research with gifted children. In D. H. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 31–45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gagné, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies , 15 , 119–147.
  • Gakhar, S. (1975). Intellectual and personality correlates of creativity (PhD in Psychology). Punjab: Punjab University.
  • Gakhar, S. , & Joshi, J. N. (1980). Creativity within the framework of personological context. Psychological Studies , 25 , 48–57.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Gohil, J. (2008). Sex difference in verbal creativity. Psycho-Lingua , 38 , 65–69.
  • Government of India . (2009). The right of children to free and compulsory education Act, 2009. No. of 35 of 2009 . New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.
  • Goyal, R. P. (1974). A study of some personality correlates of creativity in secondary school teachers under training (PhD in Education). Punjab: Punjab University.
  • Goyal, R. P. (1988). Role of parents and teachers in talent development. Cit. In M. K. Raina & S. Gulati (Eds.). Identification and development of talent (p. 193).New Delhi: NCERT.
  • Gulati, S. (1988). Instructional materials to promote children’s creativity in the classroom: Studying the effectiveness of materials fostering creativity. Indian Educational Review , 30 , 59–72.
  • Gupta, P. K. (1985). Development and evaluation of creativity training program for 6th grade children (PhD in Education). Meerut: Meerut University.
  • Howe, M. J. A. (1999). Prodigies and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 431–446). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jambunathan, S. , & Counselman, K. (2002). Parenting attitudes of Asian Indian mothers living in the United States and in India. Early Child Development and Care , 172 , 657–662. doi:10.1080/03004430215102
  • Jarial, G. S. (1981). An experiment in the training of nonverbal creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 15 , 72.10.1002/jocb.1981.15.issue-1
  • Jyothy, C . (1997). InfIuence of creativity on mathematics achievement of secondary school entrants . Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Mahatma Gandhi University.
  • Kabu, C. L . (1980). A psychological analysis of the mathematically gifted at the secondary and higher secondary levels. In M. B. Buch (Ed.), Third survey of research in education . New Delhi: NCERT.
  • Kaile, H. S. , & Kour, S. P. (1987). A study of creative talent of students in relation to their adjustment. The Educational Review , 175–179.
  • Kalia, S. , Arora, R. , & Sharma, N. (2013). Continuous and comprehensive evaluation: Challenges in implementation and impact on students’ creativity. Global Journal of Arts & Management , 3 , 140–146. ISSN 2249-2658
  • Kapur, R. L. , Subramanyam, S. , & Shah, A. (1997). Creativity in Indian science. Psychology and Developing Societies , 9 , 161–187.10.1177/097133369700900202
  • Katiyar, P. C. , & Jarial, G. S. (1985). Training programs for developing creativity among school children. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 19 , 219–220.10.1002/jocb.1985.19.issue-3
  • Kaur, P. , & Kharb, D. (1993). Creativity in children: The impact of school and home environment. Journal of Indian Education , 18 , 46–49.
  • Khire, U. (1993). Guilford’s SOI model and behavioral intelligence with special reference to creative behavioral abilities. In S. G. Isaken , M. C. Murdock , R. L. Firestein , & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 369–399). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Khire, U . (2013). Giftedness and talent in the Indian context. In G. Mishra (Ed.), History of science, philosophy and culture in indian civilization: International series of articles- psychology and psychoanalysis (Vol. 13, pp. 621–661). Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilization.
  • Khire, U. S . (1971). Creativity in relation to intelligence and personality factors . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Poona, Pune.
  • Khire, U. , Watve, S. , & Gadre, S. (2004). Effect of school climate on intellectually gifted students . Unpublished Report. New Delhi: University Grants Commission.
  • Kulkarni, S. S ., & Puhan, B. N . (1988). Psychological assessment: Its present and future trends. In J. Pandey (Ed.), Psychology in India: The state-of-the-art 1 (pp. 19–92). New Delhi: Sage.
  • Kumar, A. (1981). Personality identification of high and low creatives at age 13 or older. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 15 , 73.10.1002/jocb.1981.15.issue-1
  • Kumar, G. , & Singh, S. (1999). A study of different dimensions of creativity in relation to locality of scheduled castes and non-scheduled caste students. Journal of Psychological Researches , 24 , 43–48.
  • Kumari, K . (1975). A study of relationship among creativity, intelligence, adjustment and value patterns in adolescents (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Agra University, Agra.
  • Kurup, A ., & Maithreyi, R . (2011). Quality education study (QES) . Retrieved from http://www.educationworldonline.net
  • Kurup, A. , & Maithreyi, R. (2012). A review of challenges in developing a national program for gifted children in India’s diverse context. Roeper Review , 34 , 215–223. ISSN 1940-865X.10.1080/02783193.2012.715332
  • Lalithamma . (1979). Self-concept and creativity of over, normal and under-achievers amongst X grade students of Baroda city . Unpublished doctoral dissertation. M.S. University, Baroda.
  • Lubart, T. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology , 25 , 39–59.10.1080/00207599008246813
  • Lubart, T. I. (Dir.). (2006). Enfants exceptionnels. Précocité intellectuelle, haut potentiel et talent [Exceptional children: Precocity, high potenial and talent]. Paris: Bréal.
  • Lubart, T. L. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Madan, A . (2011). Creativity education in India: Breaking barriers three case vignettes . Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/madancpaper.pdf
  • Maitra, K . (2000). Status of gifted children in India: A country report in towards excellence. In K. Maitra (Ed.), Developing and nurturing giftedness and talent (pp. 219–225). New Delhi: Mosaic Books.
  • Maitra, K. (2006). An Indian perspective on gifted education: The synergy of India. In B. Wallace & G. Eriksson (Eds.), Diversity in gifted education: International perspectives on global issues (pp. 143–157). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Maitra, K. , & Gosain, Y. (2009). Revisiting the concept of giftedness and its status in the post-modern era. Gifted Education International , 25 , 318–325.10.1177/026142940902500314
  • Maitra, K. , & Shama, J. (2009). Non-formal curriculum for out-of-school advanced learners. Gifted Education International , 25 , 75–80.10.1177/026142940902500111
  • Majumdar, C. K. (1996). Creativity in science. In K. C. Gupta (Ed.), Aesthetics and motivations in arts and science (pp. 27–34). New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts.
  • Majumdar, S. K. (1975). A systems approach to identification and nurture of scientific creativity. Journal of Indian Education , 1 , 17–23.
  • Mandal, J. M. (1992). A study to evolve an autonomous creativity cultivation program for school students and to assess effectiveness of the program (Independent study). Kolkata: University of Calcutta.
  • Marsh, H. W. , Chessor, D. , Craven, R. , & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal , 32 , 285–319.10.3102/00028312032002285
  • Mathur, S. G. (1982). Cross-cultural implications of creativity. Indian Psychological Review , 22 , 12–19.
  • Mattoo, M. I. (1994). Vocational interests, adjustment problems and scholastic achievement of high and low creative students. Indian Educational Review , 29 , 86–88.
  • Mattoo, M. I. (2011). Vocational interests and academic achievement of secondary school students at different levels of creative thinking ability – A comparative study. Indian Educational Review , 49 , 117–129.
  • Mazumdar, D. S. (1998). The weak and the strong. In N. Hasnain (Ed.), Weaker sections: The psycho-social perspective (pp. 35–48). New Delhi: Gyan.
  • Mehdi, B. (1973). Nonverbal test of creative thinking . Aligarh: Quamar Fatima.
  • Mehdi, B. (1985). Verbal test of creative thinking . Agra: National Psychological Association.
  • Misra, G. , Suvasini, C. , & Srivastava, A. K. (2000). Psychology of wisdom: Western and eastern perspectives. Journal of Indian Psychology , 18 , 1–32.
  • Misra, G. , Srivastava, A. K. , & Misra, I. (2007). Culture and facets of creativity: The Indian perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 421–455). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mondol, K. C. (1999). Are high achievers creative learners? Journal of Centre for Pedagogical Studies In Mathematics , 2 , 14–18.
  • Mukherjee, B. N. (1993). Needed research in psycho-educational assessment in India. Psychological Studies , 38 , 85–100.
  • Mukhopadhyay, R. , & Sen, M. K. (2013). Scientific creativity- A new emerging field of research: Some considerations. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research , 2 (1), 1–9.
  • Nagarkar, M . (1996). A comparative study of effects of training in creative thinking on socially advantaged and disadvantaged children (PhD Thesis). University of Pune, Pune.
  • National Curriculum Framework . (2005). National Council for Educational Research & Training, Government of India . New Delhi: Author.
  • National Knowledge Commission . (2006). Recommendations on higher education . New Delhi: Government of India.
  • Nayana, T. S. (1981). Sex differences in creativity among adolescents in India (Abstract No. 7593). Psychological Abstracts , 1982 , 68.
  • Padhi, J. S. (1992). Relationship among the classroom environment, creativity, academic self concept and academic achievement. Asian Journal of Psychology and Education , 25 , 25–30.
  • Panda, M. , & Yadav, R. (2005). Implicit creativity theories in India. Journal of national academy of Psychology, India. , 50 , 32–39.
  • Pandey, S. (2006). Para-teacher scheme and quality education for all in India: Policy perspectives and challenges for school effectiveness. Journal of Education for Training , 32 , 319–334.
  • Pandit, D . (1999). A study of science teachers with respect to their creative ability and role as a facilitator (Unpublished MPhil Dissertation). University of Pune, India.
  • Paramesh, C. R. , & Narayanan, S. (1976). Creativity, intelligence, and vocational interests. Indian Journal of Psychology , 51 , 221–224.
  • Passi, B. K. (1972). Passi tests of creativity: Verbal and non-verbal . Agra: National Psychological Corporation, India.
  • Pathak, A. N. (1989). Creativity and personality . New Delhi: Amar Prakashan.
  • Patwardhan, V . (1994). A comparative study of thinking processes of rural and urban women with special emphasis on creative thinking . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. SNDT University, Mumbai.
  • Raina, M. K. (1968). Study of some correlates of creativity in Indian students (PhD in Education). Jaipur: Rajasthan University.
  • Raina, M. K. (1971). Verbal and non verbal thinking ability. A study in sex differences. Journal of Education and Psychology , 29 , 175–180.
  • Raina, M. K. (1984). Social cultural change and changes in creative functioning in children . New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
  • Raina, M. K . (1988). Concept and Identification of Talent. In M. K. Raina & S. Gulati (Eds.) Identification and development of talent (pp. 32–47). New Delhi: NCERT.
  • Raina, M. K. (1993). Ethnocentric confines in creativity research. In S. G. Isaken , M. C. Murdock , R. L. Firestein , & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Understanding and recognizing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 435–453). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
  • Raina, M. K. (1999). Cross cultural differences. In M. A. Runco and S.A Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of Creativity . (Vol. 1, pp. 453–464). New York, NY. Academic Press.
  • Raina, M. K. (2004). I shall be many; the garland making perspective on creativity and cultural diversity. In M. Fryer (Ed.), Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 25–44). Shipley: The Creativity Center Educational Trust.
  • Raina, M. K. , & Srivastava, A. K. (2000). India’s search for excellence: A clash of ancient colonial and contemporary influences. Roeper Review , 22 , 102–108.10.1080/02783190009554011
  • Raina, U. (1991). What is Honoured – Creativity or Conformity? Studies in the Area of Parental and Teacher Perceptions of the Ideal Child . New Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research.
  • Raj, H. S. S. (1994). Fluency, flexibility, and originality as correlates of intelligence. The Creative Psychologist , 6 , 25–30.
  • Rajagopalan, M. (1998). Creative talent in relation to convergent and divergent thinking. Perspectives in Education , 14 , 105–112.
  • Rao, G. K . (1995). A study of teacher effectiveness in relation to creativity and interpersonal relationships . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.
  • Rao, G. K. (2003). A study of teacher effectiveness in relation to creativity and interpersonal relationship. Indian Educational abstracts by NCERT, New Delhi , 3 , 84–85.
  • Reddy, R. , & Gibbons, J. L. (1999). School socioeconomic contexts and adolescent self descriptions in India. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 28 , 619–631.10.1023/A:1021662828145
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1979). What makes giftedness: A reexamination of the definition of the gifted and talented . Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendant of Schools Office.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Renzulli, J. S. (1990). A practical system for identifying gifted and talented students. Early Child Development and Care , 63 , 9–18.10.1080/0300443900630103
  • Roy, P . (2016). Creativity and science education for the gifted: Insights from psychology. In K.S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), Perspectives on science education for the gifted: Key issues and challenges (pp. 13–26). Cambridge: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-73740-1.
  • Roy, P ., & Chatterjee, A . (2014). Motivation, self concept and self portrayal of talented high school science students: Their voices . Paper presented at the First International Conference on Research in Education and Curriculum Planning for Gifted Minds, New Delhi.
  • Roy, P. , & Kurup, A. (2016). A critical assessment of gifted education in India. In D. Y. Dai & C. C. Kuo (Eds.), Gifted Education in Asia: Problems and Prospects (A Chinese American Educational Research and Development Association Book Series) (pp. 147–165). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
  • Roy, P. , Mondal, M. , Bakuli, K. , & Mishra, A. (2016). Education and Identification of Gifted Students of India . Kolkata: Maulana Abul Kalam Institute of Asian Studies.
  • Runco, M. A. , & Albert, R. S. (1986). The threshold theory regarding creativity and intelligence: An empirical test with gifted and non-gifted children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly , 11 , 212–218.
  • Sandhu, T. S. (1979). Relationship of creativity with Academic Achievement in Science Subjects. In B. K. Passi (Ed.), Creativity in Education (pp. 85–86). Agra: National Psychological Corporation.
  • Sansanwal, D. N. , & Sharma, D. (1993). Scientific creativity as a function of intelligence, self-confidence, sex and standard. Indian Journal of Psychometry and Education , 24 , 37–44.
  • Saxeena, S. (1984). A study of need achievement in relation to creativity, values, level of aspiration and anxiety. Indian Education Review , 19 , 65–71.
  • Saxena, V. (1988). A study of the impact of family relationship on adjustment, anxiety, achievement motivation, self-concept and academic achievement of high school students (Doctoral Dissertation). Agra University, Agra.
  • Sen, R. S. , & Sharma, N. (2004). Teachers’ conception of creativity and its nurture in children: An Indian perspective. In M. Fryer (Ed.), Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 25–44). Shipley: The Creativity Center Educational Trust.
  • Sen, R. S. , & Sharma, N. (2009). Teacher preparation for creative teaching contemporary. Education Dialogue , 6 , 157–192.
  • Sen, R. S. , & Sharma, N. (2011). Through multiple lenses: Implicit theories of creativity among Indian children and adults. The Journal of Creative Behavior , 45 , 273–302.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01431.x
  • Sen, R. S. , & Sharma, N. (2013). The familial context of creativity: Patterns of nurturance in families of creative children. Psychological Studies , 58 , 374–385.10.1007/s12646-013-0221-y
  • Sharma, J. (2009). Non-formal curriculum for out of school advanced learners . Bicester: AB Academic Publishers.
  • Sharma, J. (2012). Where are they? - Gifted disadvantaged children in India. Gifted Education International , 28 , 215–223.10.1177/0261429411435016
  • Sharma, J. (2016). Developing context specific processes to identify & mentor gifted children in India. International Education and Research Journal , 2 , 18–23.
  • Sharma, N. (2013). Scientific creativity in relation to cognitive style and achievement in Science of secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences , 6 , 25–29. doi:10.5958/2230-7311.2015.00004.5
  • Singh, B. (1988). Relationship between mathematical creativity and some biological factors. Indian Educational Review , 23 , 157–161.
  • Singh, C . (1978). Scientific creativity test for high school students . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ranchi University, Ranchi.
  • Singh, D. (1991). Creativity and intelligence as correlates of teaching effectiveness of secondary school teachers (PhD in Education). Punjab: Punjab University.
  • Singh, K. (1982). A study of creative thinking of highschool students of Himachal Pradesh in relation to some cognitive and non-cognitive variables (PhD in Education). Shimla: Himachal Pradesh University.
  • Singh, S. , & Mehra, G. P. (1981). Verbal creativity as related to educational and career aspiration. In B. K. Passi (Ed.), Creativity in education (pp. 105–106). Agra: NPC.
  • Srivastava, A. K ., & Misra, G . (1996). Changing perspectives on understanding intelligence: An appraisal. Indian Psychological Abstracts and Reviews , 3 , 1–34. New Delhi: Sage.
  • Srivastava, S. , & Misra, G. (2000). Culture and conceptualization of intelligence . New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Subotnik, R. F. , Olszewski-Kubilius, P. , & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest , 12 , 3–54.10.1177/1529100611418056
  • Sudhir, M. A. , & Khiangte, V. (1997). Personality and creativity among secondary school students: A study in talent development. Indian Educational Review , 32 , 115–125.
  • Sumangala, V. (1988). Psychological factor structures of high and low creative secondary pupils. A comparative study. Experiments in Education , 16 , 85–88.
  • Sumangala, V. (1995). Some psychological variables discriminating between high- and low- achievers in Mathematics. Experiments in Education , 23 , 165–175.
  • Sundararajan, L. , & Raina, M. K. (2015). Revolutionary creativity, east and west: A critique from indigenous psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology , 35 , 3–19.10.1037/a0037506
  • Suri, S. P . (1973). Differential personality traits in intellectually superior, average and below average students (PhD Thesis in Education) Kurukshetra University, Kurkshetra.
  • Taber, K . (2016). Giftedness, intelligence, creativity, and the construction of knowledge in the science classroom. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), Perspectives on science education for the gifted: Key issues and challenges (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-73740-1.
  • Upadhyay, C. (2007). Employment, exclusion and “merit” in the Indian IT industry. Economic and Political Weekly , 42 , 1863–1868.
  • Vasesi, R. (1985). Cognitive style, needs and values of high and low creative adolescents (PhD in Education). Punjab: Punjab University.
  • Verma, B. P. (1993). Creativity styles of university women students. Psycholingua , 23 , 105–113.
  • Verma, B. P. (1997). The family climate and creative personality. Journal of Educational Research and Extension , 34 , 25–33.
  • Vidyapati, T. J. , & Prakasa Rao, T. V. S. (2003). Gender and socio-cultural differences in scientific attitude, creative ability and science achievement of ninth graders. Journal of Indian Education , 19 , 58–67.
  • Vora, G. C. (1984). An investigation into impact of divergent thinking programme in Mathematics on creative levels of children of classes VII and VIII (PhD in Education). Anand: Sardar Patel University.
  • Watve, S. V. (2013). Why gifted education? Pune: Jnana Prabodhini Samshodhan Sanstha.
  • Ziegler, A . (2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson Ziegler (Eds.), Conception of Giftedness , Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  • Ziegler, A. , & Phillipson, S. N. (2012). Towards a systemic theory of gifted education. High Ability Studies , 23 (1). doi:10.1080/13598139.2012.679085
  • Ziegler, A. , Vialle, W. , & Wimmer, B. (2013). The actiotope model of giftedness: A short introduction to some central theoretical assumptions. In S. N. Phillipson , H. Stoeger , & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Exceptionality in East Asia (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.