Using more native-like language acquisition processes in the foreign language classroom

References

• Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). New directions in the study of explicit and implicit-learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 185–196. doi:10.1017/S027226311500008X10.1017/S027226311500008X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Christiansen, M. (2014). Chunk-based language acquisition. In P. Brooks & V. Kempe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language development (pp. 88–91). SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baecher, L., Farnsworth, T., & Ediger, A. (2014). The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18, 118–136. doi:10.1177/1362168813505381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardella, G., Bifone, A., Gabrielli, A., Gozzi, A., & Squartini, T. (2016). Hierarchical organization of functional connectivity in the mouse brain: A complex network approach. Scientific Reports, 6, 519. doi:10.1038/srep32060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baronchelli, A., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Pastor-Satorras, R., Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2013). Networks in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 348–360. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Lindstromberg, S., & Eyckmans, J. (2014). Some explanations for the slow acquisition of L2 collocations. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 41–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett, D. S., Wymbs, N. F., Porter, M. A., Mucha, P. J., Carlson, J. M., & Grafton, S. T. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108, 7641–7646. doi:10.1073/pnas.1018985108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuls, K., & Steels, L. (2013). Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS One, 8, e0058960. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, B., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Choudhary, K. K., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2015). The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PLoS One, 10, e0132819. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair Hedges, S., & Kumar, S. (2003). Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. Trends in Genetics, 19, 200–206. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00053-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, B. (2015). Evolution of speech-specific cognitive adaptations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bola, M., & Borchardt, V. (2016). Cognitive processing involves dynamic reorganisation of the whole-brain network’s functional community structure. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 3633–3635. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0106-16.2016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M. (2012). Hierarchical reinforcement learning and decision making. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 956–962. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulton, A., & Tyne, H. (2013). Corpus linguistics and data-driven learning: A critical overview. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 97, 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in Context. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20, 139–173. doi:10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39, 523–532. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callies, M., & Paquot, M. (2015). Learner corpus research: An interdisciplinary field on the move. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1, 1–6. doi:10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.00edi
   Google Scholar
• Calude, A. S., & Pagel, M. (2011). How do we use language? Shared patterns in the frequency of word use across 17 world languages. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1101–1107. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. W., Smith, K., Cornish, H., & Kirby, S. (2016). The cultural evolution of structured languages in an open-ended, continuous world. Cognitive Science, 41, 892–923. doi:10.1111/cogs.12371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, F. (2008). Implicit learning and language change. Theoretical Linguistics, 34, 115–122. doi:10.1515/THLI.2008.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Language as skill: Intertwining comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 244–254. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekaf, M., Cowan, N., & Mathy, F. (2016). Chunk formation in immediate memory and how it relates to data compression. Cognition, 155, 96–107. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, K., Bickel, B., van Schaik, C. P., Manser, M. B., & Townsend, S. W. (2014). Language Evolution: Syntax Before Phonology? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281, 20140263. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1500031X . Epub 2015 Apr 14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing. Language Learning, 59, 126–161.10.1111/lang.2009.59.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181–204. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 51–57. doi:10.1177/0963721409359277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., & Morris, A. (2015). Habitual control of goal selection in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 13817–13822. doi:10.1073/pnas.1506367112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, A., Kounios, L., & Power, D. (2015). Evolutionary connectionism: Algorithmic principles underlying the evolution of biological organisation in Evo-Devo, Evo-Eco and Evolutionary Transitions. Evolutionary Biology, 1–29. doi:10.1007/s11692-015-9358-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani, N., Peyrache, A., Telenczuk, B., Le Van Quyen, M., Halgren, E., Cash, S. S., … Destexhe A. (2016). Dynamic balance of excitation and inhibition in human and monkey neocortex. Scientific Reports, 6, 569. doi:10.1038/srep23176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. H., Magnus Petersson, K., Geukes, S., Zwitserlood, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Processing multiple non-adjacent dependencies: Evidence from sequence learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 367, 2065–2076. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, B. (2009). Processability theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25, 335–376. doi:10.1177/0267658309104578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T. (2014). Creatures of habit (and Control): A mulit-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44.10.1017/S0267190512000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit and explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2015). Usage-based language learning. In Brian MacWhinney and William O’Grady (eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 163–180). NJ, John Wiley & Sons,.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. WIRES Cognitive Science, 3, 129–141. doi:10.1002/wcs.1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. C., & Thiessen, E. D. (2016). Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predications of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Development Review, 37, 66–108. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2015.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26, 43–71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143
   Google Scholar
• Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2013). Evidence for the learning of syntactic comprehension. Cognitive Science, 37, 578–591. doi:10.1111/cogs.12022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, A. S., & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2015). Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair “morpheme” learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 41, 1560–1569. doi:10.1037/xlm0000114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C., Gertner, Y., Scott, R. M., & Yuan, S. (2010). Syntactic bootstrapping. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1, 143–149. doi:10.1002/wcs.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. T. (2011). Unity and diversity in human language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 376–388. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitz, H., Chang, F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clauses. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fonollosa, J., Neftci, E., & Rabinovich, M. (2015). Learning of chunking sequences in cognition and behavior. PLoS Computational Biology, 11, e1004592. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foraker, S., Regier, T., Khetarpal, N., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one. Cognitive Science, 33, 287–300. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01014.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, P. (2009). Task-based language learning research: Expecting too much or too little? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 247–263. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00242.x
   Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gibson, E. (2013). Learning and long-term retention of large-scale artificial languages. PLoS One, 8(1), e52500.10.1371/journal.pone.0052500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. L. A., & Monaghan, P. (2016). Simultaneous segmentation and generalisation of non-adjacent dependencies from continuous speech. Cognition, 147, 70–74. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning, 67, 130–154. doi:10.1111/lang.12226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: A Neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43, 724–737. doi:10.1111/ejn.13145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, S. (2008). Learner corpora in foreign language education. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Volume 4. Second and foreign language education (pp. 337–351). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Experience and grammatical agreement: Statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition, 114, 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, M. D., Yang, C., Berwick, R. C., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M. J., Watumull, J., … Lewontin, R. (2014). The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearne, L. J., Mattingley, J. B., & Cocchi, L. (2016). Functional brain networks related to individual differences in human intelligence at rest. Scientific Reports, 6, 77. doi:10.1038/srep32328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, G. E. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 428–434. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (2011). Variation, change and constructions in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 1–23. doi:10.1515/COGL.2011.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F. (2015). Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research, 1626, 118–135. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janda, L. A. (2015). Cognitive linguistics in the year 2015. Cognitive Semantics, 1, 131–154. doi:10.1163/23526416-00101005
   Google Scholar
• Joanisse, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (2015). Connectionist perspectives on language learning. Representation and processing. WIREs Cognitive Science. doi:10.1002/wes.1340
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Coyle, J. M. (2012). Long and short term cumulative structural priming effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 728–743. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.641387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, C., & Regier, T. (2012). Kinship categories across languages reflect general communicative principles. Science, 336, 1049–1054.10.1126/science.1218811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, S., Griffiths, T., & Smith, K. (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 28, 108–114.10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Multilayer Networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2, 203–271. doi:10.1093/comnet/cnu016
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015). Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition, 141, 87–102.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., Watkins, K. E., & Bishop, D. V. (2016). Neurobiological basis of language learning difficulties. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20, 701–714. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., & Poletiek, F. H. (2011). The impact of adjacent-dependencies and staged-input on the learnability of centre-embedded hierarchical structures. Cognition, 118, 265–273. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, J., & Poletiek, F. H. (2013). How “small” is “starting small” for learning hierarchical centre-embedded structures? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 423–435. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lain, S. (2016). Content-based instruction understood in terms of connectionism and constructivism. L2 Journal, 1, 18-31.
   Google Scholar
• Landsbergen, F., Lachlan, R., Ten Cate, C., & Verhagen, A. (2010). A cultural evolutionary model of patterns in semantic change. Linguistics, 48, 363–390. doi:10.1515/ling.2010.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lany, J., & Saffran, J. R. (2011). Interactions between statistical and semantic information in infant language development. Developmental Science, 14, 1207–1219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01073.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Seo, H., & Jung, M. W. (2012). Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 287–308. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2015). The emergence of language comprehension. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp. 81–92). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mahowald, K., James, A., Futrell, R., & Gibson, E. (2016). A meta-analysis of syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinčić-Ipšić, S., Margan, D., & Meštrović, A. (2016). Multilayer network of language: A unified framework for structural analysis of linguistic subsystems. Physica A, 457, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.03.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathy, F., Fartoukh, M., Gauvrit, N., & Guida, A. (2016). Developmental abilities to form chunks in immediate memory and its non-relationship to span development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 201. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2014). Acquiring formulaic language, a computational model. The Mental Lexicon, 9, 419–436. doi:10.1075/ml.9.3.03mcc
   Google Scholar
• Medaglia, J. D., Lynall, M. E., & Bassett, D. S. (2015). Cognitive network neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 1471–1491. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mišić, B., & Sporns, O. (2015). From regions to connections and networks: New bridges between brain and behaviour. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 40, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2016.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyagawa, S., Berwick, R. C., & Okanoya, K. (2013). The emergence of hierarchical structure in human language. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/psyg.2013.00071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., Brill-Schuetz, K. A., Carpenter, H., & Wong, P. M. C. (2014). Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 17, 56–72.10.1017/S1366728912000715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Doherty, J. P. W., Lee, S., & McNamee, D. (2015). The structure of reinforcement-learning mechanisms in the human brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 1, 94–100. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W. (2015). Processing determinism. Language Learning, 65, 6–32. doi:10.1111/lang.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omaki, A., & Lidz, J. (2015). Linking Parser Development to Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. Language Acquisition, 22, 158–192. doi:10.1080/10489223.2014.943903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, 409–453. doi:10.1075/lab.5.4.01phi
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122, 280–291. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleyer, M., & Winters, J. (2015). Integrating cognitive linguistics and language evolution research. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 11, 19–43. doi:10.12775/ths-2014-002
   Google Scholar
• Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2015). Syntactic processing and acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5, 516–521. doi:10.1075/lab.5.4.13poz
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeder, P. A., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2012). From shared contexts to syntactic categories: The role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 30–54. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey, A., Perruchet, P., & Fagot, J. (2012). Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: Evidence from baboons (Papio Papio). Cognition, 123, 180–184. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robenalt, C., & Goldberg, A. E. (2015). Judgment evidence for statistical preemption: It is relatively better to vanish than to disappear a rabbit, but a life guard can equally well backstroke or swim children to shore. Cognitive Linguistics, 26, 467–503. doi:10.1515/cog-2015-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., & Lieven, E. V. M. (2012). The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayama, H. (2015). Introduction to the modelling and analysis of complex systems. New York, NY: Open SUNY Textbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffer, A. M., Waszak, F., & Yeung, N. (2015). The role of prediction and outcomes in adaptive cognitive control. Journal of Physiology Paris, 109, 38–52. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Schijndel, M., Exley, A., & Schuler, W. (2013). A model of language processing as hierarchic sequential prediction. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 522–540. doi:10.1111/tops.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., … Haussler, D. (2005). Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Research, 15, 1034–1050. doi:10.1101/gr.3715005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvey, C., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2015). Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions. Cognitive Science, 39, 212–226. doi:10.1111/cogs.12150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeide, M. A., Brauer, J., & Friederici, A. D. (2015). Brain functional and structural predictors of language performance. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2004). The evolution of vocabulary. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 228, 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.12.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solé, R. V., Corominas-Murtra, B., Valverdie, S., & Steels, L. (2011). Language networks: Their structure, function, and evolution. Complexity, 15, 20–26. doi:10.1002/cplx.2030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solway, A., Diuk, C., Córdova, N., Yee, D., Barto, A. G., Niv, Y., & Botvinick, M. M. (2014). Optimal behavioral hierarchy. PLoS Computational Biology, 10, e1003779. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steels, L. (2011). Modelling the cultural evolution of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 8, 339–356. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2011.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrett, K., Arunachalam, S., & Waxman, S. R. (2014). Slowly but surely: Adverbs support verb learning in 2-year-olds. Language Learning and Development, 10, 263–278. doi:10.1080/15475441.2013.840493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szathmáry, E., & Smith, J. (1995). The major evolutionary transitions. Nature, 374, 227–232.10.1038/374227a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamariz, M., Ellison, T. M., Barr, D. J., & Fay, N. (2014). Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281, 20140488. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. Y., Eaves, E. L., Ng, J. C., Carpenter, D. M., Maia, X., Schroeder, D. H., … Haier, R. J. (2010). Brain networks for working memory and factors of intelligence assessed in males and females with fMRI and DTI. Intelligence, 38, 293–303. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279–1285. doi:10.1126/science.119278, 10.1016/j.intell.2010.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2008). The usage based theory of language acquisition. In E. I. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, E. C. (2014). Toward a constructional framework for research on language change. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 1, 3–21. doi:10.1075/cogls.1.1.01tra
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2007). Learning to parse and its implications for language acquisition. In G. Gaskell (ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, A., & Ortega, L. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language and language learning: An introduction to the special issue. Language and Cognition, 8, 335–345. doi: 10.1017/langcog.2016.15
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2016). The declarative/procedural model: A neurobiological model of language leaning, knowledge and use. In G. Hickok & S. A. Small (Eds.), The neurobiology of language (pp. 1139–1159). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vagharchakian, L., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 9089–9102. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, W. O., & Desai, R. H. (2016). The semantics of syntax: The grounding of transitive and intransitive constructions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 693–709. doi:10.1162/jocon_a_00926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bos, E., Christiansen, M. H., & Misyak, J. B. (2012). Statistical learning of probabilistic nonadjacent dependencies by multiple-cue integration. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 507–520. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8, 159–177. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.02710.1177/461445606059565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, L. C., Meyer, A. S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Concurrent statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies. Language Learning, 66, 8–30. doi:10.1111/lang.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., Lau, E. F., Stillerman, B., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). The Yin and the Yang of prediction: An fMRI study of semantic predictive processing. PLoS One, 11, e0148637. doi:10.1371/journal
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, A. (2012). Lexical contrast maintenance and the organization of sublexical contrast systems. Language and Cognition, 4, 319–355. doi:10.1515/langcog-2012-0018
   Google Scholar
• Winters, J., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2015). Languages adapt to their contextual niche. Language and Cognition, 7, 415–449. doi:10.1017/langcog.2014.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik, E. H., & Saffran, J. R. (2013). The ontogeny of lexical networks: Toddlers encode the relationship among referents when learning novel words. Psychological Science, 24, 1898–1905. doi:10.1177/0956797613478198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2012). What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. doi:10.1017/S026719051200013X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2013). Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46, 316–334. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaveroğlu, O. N., Malod-Dognin, N., Davis, D., Levnajic, Z., Janjic, V., Karapandza, R., … Pržulj, N. (2014). Revealing the hidden language of complex networks. Scientific Reports, 4, 4547. doi:10.1038/srep04547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccarella, E., & Friederici, A. D. (2016). The neurobiological nature of syntactic hierarchies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, in press. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.038
   Google Scholar