Underestimated Swiss STEM potential? Bright light on an international PISA comparison

References

• Baethge, M., Achtenhagen, F., Arends, L., Babic, E., Baethge-Kinsky, V., & Weber, S. (2006): Berufsbildungs-Pisa. Machbarkeitsstudie [PISA-VET: Feasibility study]. Munich: Franz Steiner Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (2006). Julian C. Stanley, Jr. (1918–2005). American Psychologist, 61(3), 251–252.10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473.10.1037/h0057173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127.10.1037/a0018053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Council [Bundesrat]. (2010): Mangel an MINT-Fachkräften in der Schweiz Ausmass und Ursachen des Fachkräftemangels in MINT (Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaften und Technik). Bericht des Bundesrates [Lack of STEM professionals in Switzerland: Extent and causes of the shortage of skilled workers in mathematics, computer science, natural sciences and technology]. Federal Council Report. Retrieved from https://www.wbz-cps.ch/sites/default/files/bericht_fachkraeftemangel_2010_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Federal Statistical Office [Bundesamt für Statistik]. (2010): Maturitätsquote nach Maturitätstyp und Kanton: 1998–2010 [Baccalaureate rate by type and canton]. Retrieved from http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/15/06/key/ind12.indicator.12106.1201.html?open=104#104
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2004). International comparisons of student attainment: Some issues arising from the PISA study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 319–330.10.1080/0969594042000304618
   Google Scholar
• Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165. doi:10.1126/science.1154094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., Peterson, P. E., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Endangering prosperity: A global view of the American school. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). How much do educational outcomes matter in OECD countries? Economic Policy, 26(67), 427–491.10.1111/ecop.2011.26.issue-67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, J., Laaksonen, S., & Scheinin, P. (2008). Level and balance of achievement. In J. Hautamäki, et al (Eds.), PISA 06 Finland: Analyses, reflections, explanations. Ministry of Education Publications 2008:44. Retrieved from http://www.pisa2006.helsinki.fi/files/PISA06_Analyses_Reflections_and_Explanations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Coladarci, T. (1989). Judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59(3), 297–313. doi:10.3102/00346543059003297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, T. (2005). PISA 2003. Einflussfaktoren auf die kantonalen Ergebnisse [Factors affecting cantonal results]. BFS Aktuell. Neuchâtel: Federal Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J.-A. (2017). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1–21. doi:10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnke, T., & Meyerhöfer, W. (2008): Pisa & Co. Kritik eines Programms [Pisa & Co. Criticism of a program]. Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E. (2016). Teachers as judges: A psychometric reanalysis of Hoge and Coladarci’s meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kobarg, M., & Prenzel, M. (2010). Nicht alle Nordlichter glänzen [Not all northern lights shine]. Schule im Blickpunkt, 43(5), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123–1135.10.1037/a0021276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J., & Lakin, J. (2008). The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the profiles of academically gifted students. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(2), 269–282.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 1(4), 316–345.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.10.1177/0956797614551371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 718–729.10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, U., & Angelone, D. (2008). PISA 2006: Porträt des Kantons Aargau [PISA 2006: Portrait of the Canton of Aargau]. (Forschungsgemeinschaft PISA Deutschschweiz/FL, Eds). Zurich: KDMZ.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora, J., & Pokropek, A. (2012). Gender segregation of adolescent science career plans in 50 countries. Science Education, 96(2), 234–264.10.1002/sce.v96.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. S. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94. doi:10.2307/1884513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–763. doi:10.1037/a0027627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 484–492.10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 785–794.10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W. (2005). Group differences in intelligence and related measures. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 223–239). London: Sage.10.4135/9781452233529
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W. (2006). The case of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) and how the United States of America deals with its implications compared to other countries. Presented at Evaluation 2006, The Consequences of Evaluation, Portland, Oregon. November 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, S. C. (2010). Bildung in der Schweiz unter der Lupe [Swiss education under the magnifying glass]. Die Volkswirtschaft, 3, 54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Zahner Rossier, C., & Holzer, T. (2007). PISA 2006: Kompetenzen für das Leben – Schwerpunkt Naturwissenschaften – Nationaler Bericht [PISA 2006: Skills for life – Focus on sciences]. Neuchâtel: Federal Statistical Office.
   Google Scholar