Playin’ the changes—A jazz approach to researching student-teachers’ PowerPoint presentations

References

• Adams, C. (2006). PowerPoint, habits of mind, and classroom culture. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 389–411. doi:10.1080/00220270600579141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadie, J., & Christensen, K. (1990). Jazz improv: How to play it and teach it! A unique method for improvisation based on the concept of tension and release. Thornton Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.no/books?id=7ftLAAAAYAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Apperson, J. M., Laws, E. L., & Scepansky, J. A. (2008). An assessment of student preferences for PowerPoint presentation structure in undergraduate courses. Computers & Education, 50(1), 148–153. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C., & Atkinson, R. E. (2004). Five ways to reduce power point overload. Creative Commons. Retrieved from www.indezine.com/stuff/atkinsonmaye.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baerman, N. (2004). The big book of jazz piano improvisation. New York, NY: New Bay Media LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (2003). Rhetoric of the image. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Teaching for creativity with disciplined improvisation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 94–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511997105
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226044521.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Bjørndal, B. (1978). Nye veier i didaktikken?: En innføring i didaktiske emner og begreper. Oslo: Aschehoug.
   Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors; studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camiciottoli, B. C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2015). Multimodal analysis in academic settings: From research to teaching. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. (2017). Performance: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. J., & Amernic, J. H. (2006). Power point and the dynamics of teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 31(3), 147–160.10.1007/s10755-006-9017-5
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. (2001). Musical works and performances: A philosophical exploration. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199241589.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dezutter, S. (2011). Professional improvisation and teacher education: Opening the conversation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching (pp. 27–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511997105
   Google Scholar
• Digital tilstand. (2014/2015). (No. 1). Tromsø: Norgesuniveristetet.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W., & Reinharz, J. (1984). The art and craft of teaching. Educational leadership., 40(4), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, D. S., Kinder, T. S., & Dupuis, P. (2009). HyperResearch. Researchware.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (2008). Playing the changes on the jazz metaphor: An expanded conceptualization of music-, management-, and marketing-related themes. Foundations and Trends in Marketing, 2(3–4), 185–442. doi:10.1561/1700000007
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. M. (2003). The use and abuse of PowerPoint in teaching and learning in the life sciences: A personal overview. Bioscience Education, 2(1), 1–13. doi:10.3108/beej.2003.02000004
   Google Scholar
• Jurado, J. V. (2015). 5 A multimodal approach to persuasion in conference presentationsMultimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching (p. 108).
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. A. (2010). Professional knowledge and the epistemology of reflective practice. Nursing Philosophy, 11(1), 3–14.10.1111/(ISSN)1466-769X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, J. E., & Guribye, F. (2015). Digitale presentasjonsteknologier i høyere utdanning — foreleseres holdninger og bruk. Uniped, 38(03). Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/uniped/2015/03/digitale_presentasjonsteknologier_i_hoeyere_utdanning_fore
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H. (2008). The performance of knowledge: Pointing and knowledge in powerpoint presentations. Cultural Sociology, 2(1), 75–97. doi:10.1177/1749975507086275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. Retrieved from http://books.google.no/books?id=ihTm_cI58JQC
   Google Scholar
• Kvinge, Ø. (2018). Teaching represented: A study of student-teachers’ representations of the professional practice of teaching. In K. Smith (Ed.), Norsk og internasjonal lærerutdanningsforskning: Hvor er vi? hvor vil vi gå? hva skal vi gjøre nå? (pp. 199–222). Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, L., Hauck, M., Hampel, R., & Flewitt, R. (2013). What are multimodal data and transcription? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). (pp. 44–59). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, M. (1992). The technique of creating harmonic melody for the jazz improviser. New York, NY: Consolidated Artists Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• MacAloon, J. J. (1984). Rite, drama, festival, spectacle: Rehearsals toward a theory of cultural performance. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279–301. doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781412957397
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.10.1111/tcre.2006.108.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255. doi:10.1177/0018726703056002893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, C. R. (2015). Interstitial soundings: Philosophical reflections on improvisation, practice, and self-making. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2003). Complexity, representation and the epistemology of schooling. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Querol-Julián, M., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2014). Evaluation in discussion sessions of conference presentations: Theoretical foundations for a multimodal analysis. Linguistics: Germanic & Romance Studies/Kalbotyra: Romanu ir Germanu Studijos (pp. 66). Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rockwell, S. C., & Singleton, L. A. (2007). The effect of the modality of presentation of streaming multimedia on information acquisition. Media Psychology, 9(1), 179–191. doi:10.1080/15213260709336808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley-Jolivet, E., & Carter-Thomas, S. (2005). The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: Context, argument and interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 45–70.10.1111/ijal.2005.15.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1992). The crisis of professional knowledge and the pursuit of an epistemology of practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 6(1), 49–63.10.3109/13561829209049595
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S. (2008). Designs for learning–A theoretical perspective. Designs for Learning, 1(1), 4–22. doi:10.16993/dfl.5
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter vygotsky—design för lärande. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande: Ett multimodalt perspektiv. Stockholm: Norstedts.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (2011). In Mestre, J. P. & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Chapter Two–Cognitive load theory. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press 37-76 Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-810.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, E. R. (2003). The cognitive style of PowerPoint graphics press. Retrieved from http://books.google.no/books?id=3oNRAAAAMAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. (2016). Masterclass semiotic technology: Software, social medial and digital artefacts. Odense: University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1986). The tone of teaching. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Djonov, E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2014). Semiotic technology and practice: A multimodal social semiotic approach to PowerPoint. Text & Talk, 34(3), 349–375. doi:10.1515/text-2014-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar