8,487
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Developing questionnaires to measure students’ expectations and perceptions of assessment quality

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1464425 | Received 11 Feb 2018, Accepted 10 Apr 2018, Published online: 09 Jun 2018

References

  • AERA, APA, & NCME. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Anderson, T., & Rogan, J. M. (2010). Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap. Tools for evaluating the quality of assessment instruments. The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 38, 51–57. doi:10.1002/bmb.20362
  • Archer, J., & McCarthy, B. (1988). Personal biases in student assessment. Educational Research, 30, 142–145. doi:10.1080/0013188880300208
  • Assessment reform group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/SBA/HKDSE/Eng_DVD/doc/Afl_principles.pdf
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2006). The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 153–170. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.04.006
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007a). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2, 114–129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001
  • Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007b). Teachers’ opinions on quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 857–867. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.043
  • Birenbaum, M., Breuer, K., Cascallar, E., Dochy, F., Dori, Y., Ridgway, J., … Nickmans, G. (2006). A learning integrated assessment system. Educational Research Review, 1, 61–67. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.01.001
  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167. doi:10.1080/713695728
  • Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2016). SPSS for psychologists and everybody else. New York, NY: Palgrave.
  • Brown, G. T. L., McInerney, D. M., & Liem, G. A. D. (2009). Student perspectives of assessment, considering what assessment means to learners. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 1–21). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
  • Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Cooper, K. (2011). A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(29), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-29
  • Creswell, J. W. (2008). Survey designs. In A. C. Benson & C. Robb (Eds.), Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (pp. 387–430). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
  • Dennis, I. (2007). Halo effects in grading student projects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1169–1176. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1169
  • Dijkstra, J., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2010). A new framework for designing programmes of assessment. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 379–393. doi:10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z
  • Downing, S. M. (2004). Reliability: On the reproducibility of assessment data. The Metric of Medical Education, 38, 1006–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x
  • Ecclestone, K. (2012). Instrumentalism and achievement: A socio-cultural understanding of tensions in vocational education. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 140–156). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • EHEA. (2014). Bologna process - European higher education area. Retrieved from http://www.ehea.info/
  • ENQA. (2009). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/pubs.lasso
  • Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  • Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2017). Assessment quality in tertiary education: An integrative literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 94–116. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.08.001
  • Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 67–86. doi:10.1007/BF02504676
  • Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2009). Developer, teacher, student and employer evaluations of competence-based assessment quality. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 110–119. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.05.002
  • Gulikers, J., Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2008). The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 18, 172–186. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.012
  • Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 9–34. doi:10.1080/0260293930180102
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • Kane, M. T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, 319–342. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x
  • Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50, 1–73. doi:10.1111/jedm.12000
  • Klemenčič, M. (2012). Student participation in higher education governance in Europe. International Higher Education, 66, 32–33. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/8590/7722
  • Könings, K. D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Broers, N. J. (2008). Does a new learning environment come up to students’ expectations? A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 535–548. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.535
  • Levin, B. (1998). The educational requirement for democracy. Curriculum Inquiry, 28, 57–79. doi:10.1111/0362-6784.00075
  • Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1, 155–172. doi:10.1023/A:1010024225888
  • Linn, R. L., Bakker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X020008015
  • Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2004). First-year students’ perception of capability. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 110–128. doi:10.1080/1234567032000164903
  • McMillan, J. H. (2007). Formative classroom assessment: The key to improving student achievement. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment. Theory into practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Meyer, L. H., Davidson, S., McKenzie, L., Rees, M., Anderson, H., Fletcher, R., & Johnston, P. M. (2010). An investigation of tertiary assessment policy and practice: Alignment and contradictions. Higher Education Quarterly, 64, 331–350. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00459.x
  • Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023002005
  • Moss, P. A., Pullin, D., Gee, J. P., & Haertel, E. H. (2005). The idea of testing: Psychometric and sociocultural perspectives. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 3(2), 63–83. doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0302_1
  • O’Donovan, B. (2016). How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedback. Higher Education, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0068-y
  • Roese, N. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2007). Expectancy. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. (1997). “But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 349–371. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86215-3
  • Schuwirth, L. W. T., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2004). Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weaknesses? Medical Education, 38, 974–979. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01916.x
  • Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X029007004
  • Sperber, A. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126, S124–S128. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016
  • Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times. The uses and abuses of assessment. Oxon, NY: Routledge.
  • Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 331–347. doi:10.1080/02602930500099102
  • Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2007). Are university students really customers? When illusion may lead to delusion for all! International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 17–28. doi:10.1108/09513540710716795
  • Van de Watering, G., & Van de Rijt, J. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of assessment: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficulty levels of assessment items. Educational Research Review, 1, 133–147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.05.001
  • Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2012). A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose. Medical Teacher, 34, 205–214. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239
  • Wise, S. L., & Cotten, M. R. (2009). Test-taking effort and score validity. The influence of student conceptions of assessment. In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 187–205). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
  • Wools, S., Eggen, T., & Sanders, P. (2010). Evaluation of validity and validation by means of the argument-based approach. Cadmo, 1, 63–82. doi:10.3280/CAD2010-001007
  • Zilberberg, A., Brown, A. R., Harmes, J. C., & Anderson, R. D. (2009). How can we increase student motivation during low-stakes testing? In D. M. McInerney, G. T. L. Brown, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Student perspectives on assessment: What students can tell us about assessment for learning (pp. 255–277). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
  • Zimbardo, P. G., Weber, A. L., & Johnson, R. L. (2009). Sensation and perception. In S. Frail, J. Swasey, D. Hanlon, & A. Pickard (Eds.), Psychology core concepts (pp. 287–333). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.