The impact of research practice on professional teaching practice: Exploring EFL teachers’ perception

References

• Allison, D., & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24, 61–81. doi:10.18806/tesl.v24i2.139
   Google Scholar
• Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Re-thinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141. doi:10.1191/1362168803lr118oa
   Google Scholar
• Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to action research across the professions (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139–147. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl053
   Google Scholar
• Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Topics, aims, and constraints in English teacher research: A Chinese case study. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 113–125. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolitho, R. (1987). Teaching, teacher training and applied linguistics. In V. Bickley (Ed.), Re-exploring CELT: Continuing education for language teachers (pp. 26–32). Hong Kong: Education Department.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731–747. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388. doi:10.1093/applin/amp007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43(4), 391–429. doi:10.1017/S0261444810000170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, S. (2015). Beyond the workshop: CPD for English language teachers. In S. Borg (edited by), Professional development for English language teachers: Perspectives from higher education in Turkey (pp. 5–13). Ankara: British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347–356. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Flood, J. (2018). Lost in translation? Can the use of theories of action be effective in helping teachers develop and scale up research-informed practices? Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 144–154. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabaroglu, N. (2014). Professional development through action research: Impact on self-efficacy. System, 44, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, T. (2015). Teachers’ engagement with published research: Addressing the knowledge problem. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 488–509. doi:10.1080/09585176.2015.1020820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1994). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In B. Glaser (Ed.), More grounded theory methodology (pp. 95–115). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P. (2015). The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxford Review of Education, 41(2), 234–252. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1020105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130–144. doi:10.1093/applin/14.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–35. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, E., & Burns, A. (2016). Language teacher action research: Achieving sustainability. ELT Journal, 70(1), 6–15. doi:10.1093/elt/ccv060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). The practice of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage in reflective practice: An appraisal of recent research contributions. Language Teaching Research, 20, 223–247. doi:10.1177/1362168815617335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Berkshire: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gurney, M. (1989). Implementer or innovator: A teacher’s challenge to the restrictive paradigm of traditional research. In P. Lomax (Ed.), The management of change (pp. 425-476). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2004). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 133–149). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley-Brown, J., & Sharp, C. (2003). The use of research to improve professional practice: A systematic review of the literature. Oxford Review of Education, 29(4), 449–471. doi:10.1080/0305498032000153025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K. (2001). The effects of participation in teacher research on teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 819–836. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00033-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M., Bergentoft, H., & Selin, P. (2018). Teacher researchers creating communities of research practice by the use of a professional development approach. Teacher Development, 22(2), 191–209. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1385517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd ed.). London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, M., & Christie, D. (2006). The role of teacher research in continuing professional development. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(4), 429–448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. (2003). An investigation into the impact of a continuing professional development programme designed to support the development of teachers as researchers in South Wales. Journal of in Service Education, 29, 295–314. doi:10.1080/13674580300200207
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. doi:10.1177/160940690200100202
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. W. (1990). The teacher as researcher: A historical perspective. In M. W. Olson (Ed.), Opening the door to classroom research (pp. 1–20). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Procter, R. (2015). Teachers and school research practices: The gaps between the values and practices of teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 41(5), 464–477. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1105535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (2002). Teaching as a research-based profession: Encouraging practitioner research in special education. British Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 44–48. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00236
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2014). Supporting teacher research: The work of Kenan Dikilitaş and teachers at Gediz University, Izmir. ELT Research, 29, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. N. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. In B. Glaser (Ed.), More grounded theory methodology (pp. 116–126). Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A, & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M. (2017). Insights into the role of research and development in teaching schools. Slough: NfER.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth, L., Mazzeo, C., & Connolly, F. (2017). Research practice partnerships: A strategy for promoting evidence-based decision-making in education. Educational Research, 59(2), 241–255. doi:10.1080/07391102.2017.1314108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, M., & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). English language teachers becoming more efficacious through research engagement at their Turkish university. Educational Action Research, 24(4), 550–570. doi:10.1080/09650792.2015.1076731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. (2014). Becoming researchers: A narrative study of Chinese university EFL teachers’ research practice and their professional identity construction. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 242–259. doi:10.1177/1362168813505943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar