Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning styles

References

• Ackroyd, S. (1992). Data collection in context. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Aliakbari, M., & Qasemi, N. (2012). On the relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ learning style preference and their gender, proficiency level and achievement score. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(3), 275–283. doi:10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.3.275
   Google Scholar
• Amara, N. (2015). Errors correction in foreign language teaching. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(3), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/ Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 13(2), 95–127.
   Google Scholar
• Aşkar, P., & Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 17(87): 37-47.
   Google Scholar
• Atma, N., & Widiati, U. (2016). Efl students’ preferences for corrective feedback in speaking instruction across speaking course levels. Bahasa dan Seni, 43(2): 183-195.
   Google Scholar
• Bada, E., & Okan, Z. (2000). Students’ language learning preferences. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 4(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Behroozi, B., & Karimnia, A. (2017). Educational context and ELT teachers’ corrective feedback preference: Public and private school teachers in focus. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(2): 10-15.
   Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214. doi:10.1093/applin/amp016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 53–63. doi:10.2307/3586012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (1998). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 129–140. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00112-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C., Santos, J., Conboy, J., & Martins, D. (2014). Teachers’ feedback: Exploring differences in students’ perceptions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351
   Google Scholar
• Çetinkaya, G., & Hamzadayi, E. (2015). Yabancı dil olarak Türkçe öğretim sürecinde sözel düzeltme geribildirimleri: Öğretmen ve öğrenci yeğleyişleri. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• Çevikbaş, M., & Argün, Z. (2016). Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Yanlış Cevaplara Verdikleri Dönütlerin Öğrenci Özsaygıları Üzerindeki Rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(3), 524–555.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clariana, R. B. (1999, February). Differential memory effects for immediate and delayed feedback: A delta rule explanation of feedback timing effects. A presentation at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Center ED 430 550).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Cornett, C. (1983). What you should know about learning and teaching styles. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation IN.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisiton (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learner uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2011). Student teacher assessment feedback preferences: The influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyyam, R., Meneviş, İ., & Doğruer, N. (2011). An investigation of the learning styles of prospective educators. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 1(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583–593. doi:10.1111/flan.1977.10.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, M. (1992). Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 28(1), 90–98. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda, Y. (2004). Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high school oral communication classes ( Master’s thesis). California State University, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Genç, Z. S. (2014). Correcting spoken errors in English language teaching: Preferences of Turkish EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Egitim ve Bilim, 39, 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürbüz, A. (2013). Proposing a syllabus design for oral communicative classes regarding teachers’ and students’ perceptions of modified output ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziantep University, Educational Sciences Institute, Gaziantep.
   Google Scholar
• Halaçoğlu, M. (1999). The effect of cognitive styles on learner preferences ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Ç.Ü. Institute of Social Sciences, Adana.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, J. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, F. (2007). Feedback to enhance student learning: Facilitating interactive feedback on clinical skills. International Journal of Clinical Skills, 1(1), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbari, A., & Fazilatfar, A. M. (2012). The role of error types and feedback in Iranian EFL classrooms. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 135–148. doi:10.5539/ijel.v2n1p135
   Google Scholar
• Kayacık, E. (2013). Öğrencilerin kolb öğrenme stillerine göre çalışma alışkanlıkları, ödev yapma motivasyonları ve stilleri üzerine bir çalışma ( Unpublished master’s thesis). ESOGÜ, Educational Sciences Institute, Eskisehir.
   Google Scholar
• Khorshidi, E., & Rassaei, E. (2013). The effects of learners’ gender on their preferences for corrective feedback. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(2), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. (2015). Similarities and differences between teachers’ and students’ views on corrective feedback – Korean context. The Bridge: Journal of Educational Research-Informed Practice, 2(3), 42–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1976). Learning-style inventory: Technical manual. Boston, MA: McBer and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1981). Experiential learning theory and the learning style inventory: A reply to Freedman and Stumpf. Academy of Management Review, 6(2), 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Pergamon Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79–97. doi:10.3102/00346543058001079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurbal, S. S. (2011). An investigatıon of mathematics achievement of eighth grade students with respect to their learning styles ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14, 112–127. doi:10.1080/09658410508668828
   Google Scholar
• Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web‐based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking‐styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenthal, K. M. (2001). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. (1977). Teacher feedback on learner error. Mapping cognitions. In H. D. Brown, C. Yorio, & R. Cymes (Eds.), Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 278–293). Washington, DC: TESOL.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & B. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. (2006). Recasts in SLA. The story so far. In M. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357–371. doi:10.1111/modl.1998.82.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, R. (2004). Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences: Is there a linkage? Educational Psychology, 24(1), 99–108. doi:10.1080/0144341032000146476
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497. doi:10.1017/S0272263100004022
   Google Scholar
• Najmaddin, S. (2010). Teachers ‘and students ‘perceptions of types of corrective feedback in writing ( Doctoral dissertation). Bilkent University, Ankara. Retrieved March 2017, from http://www.thesis.bilkent.edu.tr/0003965.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535–562. doi:10.1177/1362168816644940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olić, S., & Adamov, J. (2016). Relationship between learning styles grammar students and school achievement. Teme, 4, 1223–1240.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 519–533. doi:10.1111/modl.2003.87.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, G. (2016). An investigation on the use of oral corrective feedback in Turkish EFL classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H. S. (2010). Teachers’ and learners’ preferences for error correction ( Unpublished MA thesis). California State University, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265–289. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9
   Google Scholar
• Philbin, M., Meier, E., Huffman, S., & Boverie, P. (1995). A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles, 32(7), 485–494. doi:10.1007/BF01544184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rashti, N. B., & Tous, M. D. (2016). Does learners’ proficiency level affect oral corrective feedback preferences? International Journal of Linguistics, 8(4), 150–165. doi:10.5296/ijl.v8i4
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, A. S., & Cummings, R. (2005). Implementing Kolb’s learning styles into online distance education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30. doi:10.1093/elt/cci003
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244–258. doi:10.1111/modl.2001.85.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severiens, S. E., & Ten Dam, G. T. (1994). Gender differences in learning styles: A narrative review and quantitative meta-analysis. Higher Education, 27(4), 487–501. doi:10.1007/BF01384906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2010). Correct me if I am wrong: Investigating the preferences in error correction among adult English language learners ( MA thesis). University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, N., & Frohlich, M. (1995). COLT. Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin, H., & Çelik, F. (2011). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği öğretmen adaylarının cinsiyet ve öğrenim gördükleri sınıf düzeyleri bakımından öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi (MAKÜ Örneği). Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Taheri, P., & Khanlarzadeh, M. (2016). On the relationship between EFL learners’ socio-economic status and their attitudes toward oral corrective feedback: A mixed-method study. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 75–59.
   Google Scholar
• TEPAV & British Council. (2013). Turkey national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. Retrieved March 2017, from http://www.britishcouncil.org.tr/sites/default/files/turkey_national_needs_assessment_of_state_school_english_language_teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437–456. doi:10.3138/cmlr.55.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10, 293–309. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00031-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. E., Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2003). Educational psychology (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto: Pearson Education Canada Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz-Soylu, M., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2009). The effect of learning styles on achievement in different learning environments. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(4), 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. (2008). Teachers’ choice and learners’ preference of corrective feedback types. Language Awareness, 17(1), 78–93. doi:10.2167/la429.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, R. (2006). The analysis of the relationship between learning styles and the learners ‘knowledge acquisition and reactions through the online case study ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429–439. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar