Effects of corrective feedback on EFL speaking task complexity in China’s university classroom

References

• Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 191–205. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2014). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 29, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41, 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doughty, C. & Long, M. H (2003). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Drewelow, I., & Theobald, A. (2007). A comparison of the attitudes of learners, instructors and native french speakers about the pronunciation of French: An exploratory study. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 491–520. doi:10.1111/flan.2007.40.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y. (2016). The use of first and second language in Chinese university EFL classrooms. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 39–68. doi:10.1017/S0272263106060141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Z. D. (2012). Complexity measures, task type, and analytic evaluations of speaking proficiency in a school-based assessment context. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 133–151. doi:10.1080/15434303.2010.516041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gurzynski-Weiss, L. & Revesz, A. (2012). Tasks, teacher feedback, and learner modified output in naturally occurring classroom interaction. Language Learning, 62: 851-879. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D. (2013). What makes learners anxious while speaking English: A comparative study of the perceptions held by university students and teachers in China. Educational Studies, 39(3), 338–350. doi:10.1080/03055698.2013.764819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D. (2018). Foreign language learning anxiety in China. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L. (2014). A review of development of Chinese university English teaching in recent 30 years. Foreign Language World, 6, 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. & Lyster, R. (2016). The effects of corrective feedback on instructed L2 speech perception. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1): 35–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2009). The differential effects of implicit and explicit feedback on second language learners at different proficiency levels. Applied Language Learning, 19, 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of chinese EFL Learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71–86. doi:10.1111/modl.2008.92.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Li, Z. (2012). Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 553–568. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects on prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432. doi:10.1017/S0272263104263021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. doi:10.1017/S0272263197001034
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302. doi:10.1017/S0272263109990520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, A. (2007). The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System, 4, 202–214. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education in China. (2007). College english curriculum requirements. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2016). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analysis of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31, 267–278. doi:10.1177/0267658314536436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Zhang, J. L. (2015). Exploring non-native English-speaking teachers’ cognitions about corrective feedback in teaching English oral communication. System, 55, 111–122. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revesz, A. (2011). Task complexity, focus on L2 construction, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 95: 162–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revesz, A., Ekiert, M., & Rorgersen, E. (2016). The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 3716, 828–848.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. Cognition and Second Language Instruction, 21, 287–318.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 1–32. doi:10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45, 193–213. doi:10.1515/iral.2007.009
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchon, R. (2017). The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 67(2), 394–430.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic comp. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53–67. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar