Exploration of empathy factors in the science and development of related scales

References

• Ackermann, E. (2010). Constructivism (s): Shared roots, crossed paths, multiple legacies. Proceedings of Constructionism. Retrieved from. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.473.6201&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, D. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “basic empathy scale.”. Journal of Adolescence, 32(2), 393–408. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: Insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI). Handbook of Emotional Intelligence, 99(6), 343–362.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_1
   Google Scholar
• Carkhuff, R. R. (1969). Helping and human relations: A primer for lay and professional helpers. (Volume 1). Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy/Revue Canadienne De Counseling Et De Psychothérapie, 5(1), Retrieved from, https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/cjc/index.php/rcc/article/view/2429
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, M. J., Greenspan, S, & Barenboim, C. (1974). Assessment and training of role-taking and referential communication skills in institutionalized emotionally disturbed children. Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 546-553. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., Choi, K., Chae, J., Sung, J., & Suh, Y. (2000). Development of elementary science curriculum to enhance creative problem-solving abilities: Infusing contents & process knowledges with creative thinking skills. The Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., & American Psychological Association. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Retrieved from https://www.uv.es/friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeSeCo, O. E. C. D. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. OCDE-USAID. Recuperado en http://www.deseco.admin.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.html
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, D. D. (1993). Competency-based performance improvement: A strategy for organizational change. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. (2000). How scientists think in the real world: Implications for science education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00050-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, G. (1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: US: Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 101-131.
   Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. (2000). Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman. ( H. Kim Trans.). Seoul: Saieonseubukseu. (Original work published in 1985)
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327. doi:10.1037/h0061470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, J. (2005). My life with the chimpanzees. (S. Park, Trans.). Seoul: Saieonseubukseu. ( Original work published in 1996)
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Empathy, its limitations, and its role in a comprehensive moral theory. In J. Gerwitz & W. Kurtines (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior, and moral development (pp. 283–302). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., Nasca, T. J., Mangione, S., Vergare, M., & Magee, M. (2002). Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement and relationship to gender and speciality. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1563–1569. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2012). Empathy: What it is and why it matters. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J., & Cho, Y. (2012). Analysis of the studies of creativity education in Korea: Focusing on approaches toward creativity education. The Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(4), 659–682.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, S. G. (2006). Nobel prize winner’s life and affection—James Watson and Francis Crick. The Science & Technology, 39(7), 90–93.
   Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Chung, 표., & Pyo, J. Y. (2011). The effectiveness of creative problem solving (CPS) learning on student science interest, science process skills, and science achievement. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 657–667. doi:10.24231/rici
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Jo, J., Kim, B., Ye., K., Pak, C. I. Y., Jang, M., … Cha, S. (2012). Long-term vision of national education: Educational vision and strategy for the next 10 years. (gug-ga-gyo-yug-ui jang-gi-bi-jeon: Hyang-hu 10nyeon-ui gyo-yug-bi-jeon-gwa jeon-lyag) (CR2011-106). Chungbuk: Korean Educational Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., Ha, J. H., Park, K. T., & Kang, S. J. (2008). The analysis of student-student verbal interactions on the problem-solving inquiry which was developed for creativity-increment of the gifted middle school students. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 18(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (1997). A study on the relation between emotional resonance and academic performance, sociality in class, attitude toward school ( Unpublished MA thesis). hag-saeng-ui gam-jeong-gong-myeong-gwa hag-eob-seong-jeog, hag-geub-nae sa-hoe-seong, hag-gyo-e dae-han tae-do-wa-ui gwan-gye-e gwan-han yeon-gu. Seoul, Korea: Chung-Ang University
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. C., Jeon, H. S., & Park, K. S. (2002). The instructional program of creative problem-solving: Development and experimental analysis. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 40(1), 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, W. (2013). The research of thinking process of university students through activities based on design thinking ( Master’s thesis). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Chungbuk.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. (1975). The psychoanalyst in the community of scholars. In Annual of psychoanalysis (Vol. 3, pp.341–370). New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (2015). Exploration of core competence and development of process for the introduction of design thinking to science education as a method for group creativity education ( Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju, Chungbuk.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Chin, Y. (2014). Trend of imagination studies and re-characterizing of imagination types. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(7), 281–308.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. G. (2007). Qualitative research methodology. Paju: Beopmunsa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Lee, Y. (2007). Development of blended instructional model for creative problem solving. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(2), 135–159. doi:10.17232/KSET.23.2.135
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. L. (2010). Design thinking. ( G. Lee, Trans.). Soeul: Ungjinwingseu. (Original work published in 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., & DeChurch, L. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546. doi:10.1037/a0013773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Y. (1999). A research on EI development programs for character education. Journal of the College of Education, 59, 31–50. Retrieved from. http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/72604#export_btn.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education and Science Technology [MEST], (2011). 2009 revised national science curriculum. Seoul.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National committee for science education standards and assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). The PISA 2015 draft science framework. Retrieved May 29, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simmon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Park, I., & Kang, S. (2011). Science teachers’ perceptions on scientific and creative problem solving. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(2), 314–327.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2010). Future education vision research (Mirae gyoyung bijeon yeongu). Chungbuk: Korean Educational Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (1997). Empathy and pro-social behavior (gong-gam-gwa chin-sa-hoe haeng-dong). Seoul: Muneumsa.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2004). Empathy: Yesterday and Today (kong-kam-hak: Eo-je-wa o-neul). Seoul: Hakjisa.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. PO Box 320, Mansfield, CT 06250: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis Penguin. Seoul, (Lee, K. Trans). Mineumsa, Original work published in 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. M. (2007). Sparks of genius. ( J. Park, Trans.). Seoul: Ekoui seojae. ( Original work published in 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (vol. 21–30). Washington, DC, American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10692-002.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, K. (1994). Relations between the cognitive, affective and communicative components of the empathic process. Student Guidance Center Pusan National University, 29(1), 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at work models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of shared and unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginkel, W. P., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 218–229. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: Being a personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., & Kang, S. (2016). Study on the development of a core competency model for the convergent gifted. The Korean Society for Gifted and Talented, 15, 93–119.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, M. (2011). The relationship of self-efficacy and empathy to flow in children’s learning ( Master’s thesis). Dankook University, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Yerrick, R., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Introduction: The role of language in science learning and teaching. Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H., & Woo, A. J. (2011). The development and implementation of teaching-learning program for enhancement of scientific creativity. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—Empowering research—198—and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314. doi:10.1080/09500690500336973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar