Predatory publishing as a case of symbolic violence: A critical English for academic purposes approach

References

• Abbasi, A. R., & Akbari, N. (2008). Are we encouraging patchwriting? Reconsidering the role of the pedagogical context in ESL student writers’ transgressive intertextuality. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 267–284. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atta-ur-Rahman,, & Nasim, A. (2004). Time for enlightened moderation: A call for islamic nations to renew and reaffirm their commitment to science. Nature, 432, 273–274. doi:10.1038/432273a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babaii, E., & Nejadghanbar, H. (2017). Plagiarism among iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior, 27(3), 240–258. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1138864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadori, M., Izadi, M., & Hoseinpourfard, M. (2012). Plagiarism: Concepts, factors and solutions. Iranian Journal of Military Medicine, 14(3), 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. (2013). The open-access movement is not really about open access. Triple C, 11(2), 589–597. doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. (2014). Unintended consequences: The rise of predatory publishers and the future of scholarly publishing. Editorial Office News, (2014(2), 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Benesch, S. (1999a). Rights analysis: Studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 313–327. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00011-8
   Google Scholar
• Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berdie, D. R., & Anderson, J. F. (1974). Questionnaire design and use. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M. (2017). Everything you ever wanted to know about predatory publishing but were afraid to ask. In ACRL 2017, Baltimore, Maryland, March 22–25, 2017. [Conference paper]
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. R. Nice, Trans. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. 1990. Reproduction in education, society and culture. R. Nice, Trans. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. (2013). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495(7442), 433–435. doi:10.1038/495433a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, M. M., & Young, K. M. (2015). Awareness of “predatory” open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2, 22. doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. M., & Thompson, D. R. (2012). Making good choices about publishing in the journal jungle [editorial]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(11), 2373–2375. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, P., & Healy, J. (2004). Symbolic violence, locality and social class: The educational and career aspirations of 10–11 year olds boys in belfast. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 12, 15–33. doi:10.1080/14681360400200187
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 663–688. doi:10.2307/3588284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drugas, M. (2015). Predatory publishing and the psychology behind it. Psychological Thought, 8(1), 1–6. doi:10.5964/psyct.v8i1.136
   Google Scholar
• Erfanmanesh, M. A., & Pourhossain, R. (2017). Publishing in predatory open access journals: A case of iran. article in publishing. Research Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, F. (2009). Plagiarism: Where unawareness makes a lame excuse. Arch Iranian Med, 12(2), 176–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fealy, S., Biglari, N., & Pezeshkirad, G. (2012). Negaresh va raftare daneshjooyane daneshkade keshavarzie Tarbiat Modarres dar zamine serghate elmi [Attituds and behaviors of students in Faculty of Agriculture, TarbiatModarres University towards plagiarism]. Faslnameh Pazhoohesh Va Barname Rizi Dar Amoozeshe Ali, 65, 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, H., Beckett, G., & Huang, D. (2013). From ‘import’ to ‘import—Export’ oriented internationalization: The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China. Language Policy, 12(3), 251–272. doi:10.1007/s10993-013-9285-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (2005). Problems with publishing: Existing state and solutions. European Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 173–190. doi:10.1007/s10657-005-5426-7
   Google Scholar
• Gunaydin, G. P., & Dogan, N. O. (2015). A growing threat for academicians: Fake and predatory journals. The Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 9–96.
   Google Scholar
• Habibzadeh, F. (2006). A bird’s eye view of science publishing and editing in Iran. European Sciences Editing, 32, 98–100.
   Google Scholar
• Habibzadeh, F. (2008). On stealing words and ideas. Hepatitis Monthly, 8(3), 171–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, N., & Hadley, G. (2004). Demystifying institutional practices: Critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 355–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasrati, M. (2013). Material and credentialing incentives as symbolic violence: Local engagement and global participation through joint publication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 154–179. doi:10.1177/1050651912468886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iranian Students’ Behavioral Guiding Manual. n.d. Retrieved from http://student.kashanu.ac.ir. April 20, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Sciences Technical, 11, 389–394.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (1992). Pierre Bourdieu. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Khamesan, A., & Amiri, M. A. (2011). Barresie taghalobe tahsili dar mian daneshjooyane dokhtar va pesar [Studing educational plagiarism among male and femlae students]. Faslnameye Akhlagh Dar Oloom Va Fanavar, 6(1), 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430, 311–316. doi:10.1038/430311a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhotia, S. C. (2015). Predatory journals and academic pollution. Current Science, 108(8), 1407–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2013). English, scientific publishing and participation in the global knowledge economy. In E. Erling & P. Sargeant (Eds.), English and international development (pp. 220–242). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrdad, M., Heydari, A., Sarbolouki, M. N., & Etemad, S. (2004). Basic science in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientometrics, 61, 79–88. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000037364.65282.4d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G., & Bedeian, A. G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422–445. doi:10.1108/13620431111167751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., … Daniel, R. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23. doi:10.1038/549023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, C. Z., & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Narimani, M., & Dadkhah, M. (2017). Predatory journals and perished articles: A letter to editor. Emerg (Tehran), 5(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 253–269. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00019-7
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. London, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Perneger, T. V., Courvoisier, D. S., Hudelson, P. M., & Gayet-Ageron, A. (2015). Springer. Qual Life Res, 24, 147–151. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Renandya, W. A. (2014). What are Bogus journals and why should we avoid them. Beyond Words, 2, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rezanejad, A., & Rezaei, S. (2013). Academic dishonesty at universities: The case of plagiarism among Iranian language students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11, 275–295. doi:10.1007/s10805-013-9193-8
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2016). Predatory journals: Illegitimate publishing and its threat to all readers and authors. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(12), 1830–1833. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethapathy, G. S., Kumar, J. U., & Hareesha, A. S. (2016). India’s scientific publication in predatory journals: Need for regulating quality of Indian science and education. Current Science, 111(11), 1759–1764. doi:10.18520/cs/v111/i11/1759-1764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahghasemi, E., & Akhavan, M. (2015). Confessions of academic ghost authors: The Iranian experience. Sage Open, 5(1), 1–7. doi:10.1177/2158244015572262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumba, A. (2010). Accredited research output by academic staff according to DoHET benchmarks. Paper presented at a Research Orientation Seminar, School of Teacher Education, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa. March 18, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany: A comparative study based on Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Springer Gabler Verlag publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J., Schirato, T., & Danaher, G. (2002). Understanding Bourdieu. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrmeijer, M. (2014). Exposing the predators. Methods to stop predatory journals. Master Thesis. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University. Available at: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/28943.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, G. (2001). The academic journal: Has it a future? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9, 9. doi:10.14507/epaa.v9n9.2001
   Google Scholar
• Zamani, B. E., Azimi, A. S., & Soleimani, N. (2012). Differences in students’ viewpoints about effective factors on plagiarism according to their gender and academic disciplines. Ethics in Science & Technology, 7(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar