Teaching the concept of time: A steam-based program on computational thinking in science education

References

• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21^st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Armknech, M. P. (2015). Case study on the efficacy of an elementary STEAM laboratory school. A Dissertation submitted to the Education Faculty of Lindenwood University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, C. M. (2006). Higher education: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics trends and the role of federal programs. Testimony before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives, GAO-06-702T, Government Accountability Office.
   Google Scholar
• Balay, R. (2004). Globalization, information society and education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 37(2), 61–82.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D., Harrison, J., & Conery, L. (2011). Computational thinking: A digital age skill for everyone. Learning & Leading with Technology, 38(6), 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çorlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: Implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108. doi:10.1177/1558689808330883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J. (2009). Beyond computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 52(6), 28–30. doi:10.1145/1516046.1516054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. E. (2010). Evolution of STEM in the United States. In 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.iteea.org/Resources/PressRoom/AustraliaPaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parlament Communities. (2015). Encouraging STEM studies labour market situation and comparison of practices targeted at young people in different member states. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542199/IPOL_STU(2015)542199_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, H., & Kuenzi, J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, Y., Chong, L. M., & Cho, H. K. (2012, November 26–29). Designing a robotics-enhanced learning content for STEAM education. 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI) Daejeon, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Jon, J. E., & Chung, H. I. (2013). STEM report: Republic of Korea. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA). Melbourne: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, D. E. (1985). Dynamic huffman coding. Journal of Algorithms, 6(2), 163-180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: Background. federal polic, and legislative action. Congressional Research Servies Reports. Paper 35. CRS-1- CRS-3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35/
   Google Scholar
• MEB. (2016). Yenilik ve Eğitim Teknolojileri Genel Müdürlüğü STEM Eğitimi Raporu. MEB Yayınları. Ankara. [General Directorate of Innovation and Education Technologies STEM Education Report. MEB Publications. Ankara.]
   Google Scholar
• Moye, J. (2011). Putting core academics into context. CTE courses provide an excellent platform for students to learn the relevance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) as well as literature, arts and social studies. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ926077.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., & Ridenour, C. S. (2008). Mixed methods research: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, S., & Labov, J. (2014). STEM learning is everywhere: Summary of a convocation on building learning systems. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Öner, A. T., Navruz, B., Bicer, A., Peterson, C. A., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). T-STEM academies’ academic performance examination by education service centers: A longitudinal study. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(4), 40–51. doi:10.19128/turje.35590
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou, K. (2010). Introducing robotics to teachers and schools: Experiences from the terecop project. Constructivism: Paris. Retrieved from http://hermes.di.uoa.gr/frangou/papers/eurologo%202010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, N., & Ko, Y. (2012). Computer education’s teaching-learning methods using educational programming language based on STEAM education. In J. J. Park, A. Zomaya, S.-S. Yeo, & S. Sahni (Eds.), 9th International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing (NPC). Sep 2012 Lecture Notes in Computer Science. LNCS-7513. Network and Parallel Computing (pp. 320–327). Gwangju, South Korea: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). Report to The President Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science. Technology. engineering. and Math (STEM) for America’s Future. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stem-ed-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., & Silverman, B. (2005). Some reflections on designing construction kits for kids. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘05) (pp. 117–122). doi:10.1145/1109540.1109556
   Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). 21st century skills, not new, but worthy challenge. American Educator, 34(1), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. E. (2009). A comparative case study of the characteristics of science. technology. engineering. and mathematics (STEM) focused high schools. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasian, J. (2011). Building a science, technology, engineering, and math education agenda: An update of state actions. Washington. DC: National Governors Association (NGA). Center for Best Practices. Retrieved from http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/1112STEMGUIDE.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410. doi:10.1080/09500690601068095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M. S., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Defining computational thinking for science, technology, engineering, and math. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2014). Philadelphia. USA. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/2014/CT-STEM_AERA_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 366, 3717–3725. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In Proceedings of The 42nd ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education (pp. 465–470). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Yakman, G. (2008). STΣ@M education: An overview of creating a model of integrative education. Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2008 Annual Proceedings. Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Yakman, G., & Hyonyong, L. (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the U.S. as a practical educational framework for Korea. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072–1086. doi:10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
   Google Scholar
• Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). The impact of STEM activities on 5th grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes towards science. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(2), 249–265.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed..), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific ıssues and discourse in science education. Dordrecht: Springer. Science & Technology Education Library. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar