The effect of strategy-based instruction on EAP students’ reading performance and reading autonomy

References

• Ajideh, P. (2009). Autonomous learning and metacognitive strategies essentials in ESP class. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 162–168.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460–472. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezci, E. (1998). An investigation of the cognitive reading strategy needs of the freshman students at Hacettepe University (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara, Turkey: Bilkent University.
   Google Scholar
• Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 463–494. doi:10.2307/3586295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolukbas, F. (2013). The effect of reading strategies on reading comprehension in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Academic Journals, 8(21), 2147–2154. doi:10.5897/ERR2013.1614
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Hands-on guide to questionnaire research: Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7451), 1312–1315. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L., & Carson, J. G. (1997). Extensive and intensive reading in an EAP setting. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 47–60. doi:10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00031-2
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Course, S. (2017). Reading strategies and reading diaries for autonomous learning in a Turkish context. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(1), 124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. Asian EFL Journal, 24, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, J. (1984). ESL readers’ internalized models of the reading process. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, & B. P. Taylor (Eds), On TESOL 83 (pp. 95–108). Washington, DC: TESOL.
   Google Scholar
• Gillett, A., & Wray, L. (2006). EAP and success in assessing the effectiveness of EAP programs. Retrieved from http://www.uefap.com/articles/aeeapp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Griffee, D. T. (2012). An introduction to second language research methods: Design and data (1st ed.). California, US: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harderbeck, M. M. (2006). Effectiveness and usage of reading comprehension strategies for second grade title 1 students (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Minnesota State, Education Department, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., & Blass, L. (2007). Quest 3: Reading and writing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptman, P. C. (1979). A comparison of first and second language reading strategies among English-speaking university students. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4, 173–201.
   Google Scholar
• Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and non successful second language learners. System, 5, 110–123. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(77)90087-2
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. C. (2006). Reading English for academic purposes: What situational factors may motivate learners to read? System, 34, 371–383. doi:10.1016/j.system.2006.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahankohan, P., & Shahrokhi, M. (2014). The impact of word knowledge and reading comprehension strategies on the leathers’ autonomy in ESP text materials. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 518–532.
   Google Scholar
• Jamil, M. G. (2010). Promoting learner autonomy on a university course of English for academic purposes: A BRAC university case study. BRAC University Journal, 7(1 & 2), 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karatay, H. (2007). A research about reading comprehension skills of primary school preservice teachers of Turkish (Unpublished Doctoral thesis). University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Karatay, H. (2009). A metacognitive awareness inventory of reading strategies. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(19), 58–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, L. F. (1994). Improved reading performance for ESL students through academic course pairing. Journal of Reading, 37, 376–384.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., Padron, Y. N., & Waxman, H. C. (1985). The cognitive reading strategies of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 789–792. doi:10.2307/3586677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macro strategies for language teaching. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good readers and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 383–399. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, N. T. C. (2009). Learner autonomy and EFL learning at the tertiary level in Vietnam (Doctoral thesis). University of Victoria, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. ELT Journal, 1, 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mihara, K. (2011). Effects of pre-reading strategies on EFL/ESL reading comprehension. TESL Canada Journal, 28(2), 51–73. doi:10.18806/tesl.v28i2.1072
   Google Scholar
• Mikulecky, B., & Jeffries, L. (2004). Reading power. United States: Pearson, Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslemi, F., Moinzadeh, A., & Dabaghi, A. (2011). ESP needs analysis of Iranian MA students: A case study of the University of Isfahan. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 121–129. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p121
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1999). Relationships between second language learning strategies and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 1(38), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Özbay, M. (2006). Turkish special teaching methods. Ankara: Öncü Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, J. (2008). Research on good and poor reader characteristics: Implication for L2 reading research in China. Reading in Foreign Language Journal, 20, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2006). Modeling cognitive and metacognitive strategies and their relationship to EFL reading test performance. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 1, 53–95.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. M. O., & Nasr, A. (2004). Improving reading performance among Egyptian engineering students: Principles and practice. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 23, 425–445. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, A. S. (2000). Language learning strategies instruction and language use applied to foreign language reading and writing: A simplified menu approach. Literacy across Cultures, 4(1), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Salli, A. (2002). Teacher’s perception of strategy training in reading instruction (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey. 10.1044/1059-0889(2002/er01)
   Google Scholar
• Saricoban, A., & Alyas, A. (2011). Metacognitive strategies and learner autonomy in EFL reading. Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 1(1), 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, S. C. (1991). A causal model on factors affecting EFL reading comprehension of two-year college students in Taiwan. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 4, 25–110.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi, S. H., Maghsoudi, M., Mahmoudi, H., & Samadi, F. (2014). The interaction between Persian and English in enhancing Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension ability. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 1866–1875. doi:10.1016/I.sbspro.2014.03.617
   Google Scholar
• Tankersley, K. (2003). The threads of reading: Strategies of literacy development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Curriculum and Supervision Development.
   Google Scholar
• Thanasolus, D. (2000). Autonomy and learning: An epistemological approach. Applied Semiotics, 10, 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. G. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Read Psychology, 27, 313–343. doi:10.1080/02702710600846852
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. F. (2003). The effects of instruction in pre-reading strategies on reading comprehension (Education and Human Development Master’s Thesis). The College at Brockport: State University of New York. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/ehd_theses/327
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Journal of Instructional Sciences, 36(2), 89–116. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvetina, M. (1987). From research to pedagogy: What do L2 reading studies suggest? Foreign Language Annals, 20, 233–238. doi:10.1111/flan.1987.20.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar