Analyzing the moderating effect of knowledge innovation of tourism and hospitality department teachers on student creative self-efficacy and innovation behaviors by using hierarchical linear modeling

References

• Aliakbari, F. H. (2015). A comparison between self-efficacy and creativity of students in ordinary and smart schools. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, 5(1), 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the working environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45–68. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marking Science, 16, 76–94.
   Google Scholar
• Bammens, Y. P. M. (2015). Employees’ innovative behavior in social context: A closer examination of the role of organizational care. Journal of Product Innovation Management. doi:10.1111/jpim.12267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 771–792. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, G. G. (2005). Research notes and commentaries clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 287–295. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2015). Innovation policy for knowledge production and R&D: The investment portfolio approach. In F. Crespi & F. Quatraro (Eds.), The economics of knowledge, innovation and systemic technology policy (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. C., & Yang, Y. L. (2012). The effect of organization’s innovational climate on student’s creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1), 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. J., Shiu, S. C., & Chuang, C. F. (2012). The relationship of college students’ process of study and creativity: Creative self-efficacy as a mediation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science, 2(3), 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administration Science Quarterly, 29, 392–409. doi:10.2307/2393031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101–115. doi:10.1108/13673270510602809
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (2002). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), 1725–1753. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emsley, D. (2005). Restructuring the management accounting function: A note on the effect of role involvement on innovativeness. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 157–177. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2005.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 15–33. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00102-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilan-Deh, A. S. A., & Chamanzamin, M. R. (2016). Investigating the relationship between knowledge management and employees’ innovative behavior at custom organizations of Guilan Province. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(1), 213–245.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. H. (1996). Transformational leadership of principals in a midsize school district in Colorado. Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Colorado: Colorado State University.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. M. (1995). Innovation: The core competence. Planning Review, 23, 32–36. doi:10.1108/eb054532
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. C. (2008). A study of developing the organizational knowledge innovation scale: With adult education organization as an example. Journal of Pingtung University of Education, 31, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. L. A., & Fan, H. L. (2006). Assessing organizational innovation vitality: The development of a scale. Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference. Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-Y., & Hung, S. P. (2009). A study of examining construct validity on the scale of creative self-efficacy for students through both linear and nonlinear approaches. Journal of Pingtung University of Education, 33, 489–513.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/10400410709336883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal, N. K., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership, innovation climate, creative self-efficacy and employee creativity: A multilevel study. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51(October), 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within- group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2&3), 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong, J., & Hartog, D. D. (2007). How leaders influence employees’ innovative behaviour. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41–64. doi:10.1108/14601060710720546
   Google Scholar
• Kabasheva, I. A., Rudaleva, I. A., Bulnina, I. S., & Askhatova, L. I. (2015). Organizational factors affecting employee innovative behavior. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1 S3), 435–439.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169–211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785–804. doi:10.1002/job.v30:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members‘ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331431.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo, K. K., Yeap, J. A. L., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Knowledge absorptive capacity and process innovation: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Journal of Technology Management and Business, 1(1), 1-20.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. OrganizationalResearch Methods, 3(3), 211–236. doi:10.1177/109442810033001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleysen, R. F., & Stree, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005660
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z. X. (2007). Teacher’s alienation. Contemporary Educational Forum, 5, 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T. Y. (2000). The viewpoint from knowledge economy to think the educators professional growth and development. School Administrators, 9, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. C. (2005). A study of teacher culture in the process of curriculum innovation: Taking the learning domain of Chinese language art in junior high school as an example (Unpublished Master Dissertation). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449–460). New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Republic of China (2015). Education Statistical Information No.40. Retrieved October 7, 2015, from http://www.edu.tw/e_board/list.aspx?Node=1075&Index=4&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy, S. K., Wheeler, J. V., & Simmons, B. L. (2005). Self-managing work teams: Enhancing organizational innovativeness. Organizational Development Journal, 23(3), 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nonake, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies’ creating the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff, C., & Bowen, D. E. (2000). Moving HR to a higher level: Human resource practices and organizational effectiveness. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 211–266). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sak, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216–222. doi:10.1080/02783190409554272
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Burce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C. L., & Li, P. H. (2008). Exploring the effects of knowledge process capability and collaborative capability on knowledge innovation and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Technology Management, 13(4), 87–117.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creativity in personality, development, and social psychology: Any links with cognitive psychology? In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought—An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 309–324). Washington, DC: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taiwan Tourist Hotel Association (2015). Taiwan passenger population broken 9,900,000 people create new high again in 2014. Retrieved May 6, 2015, from, http://www.ttha.org.tw/news_view.aspx?id=106.
   Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation: Integrating technological market and organizational change. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tinerney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, K. H., Yang, H. J., Chen, J. T., & Tseng, C. H. (2005). A study on the feasible strategies and the impeditive factors to innovate knowledge for elementary teachers. Journal of Education, 25, 51–78.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. J. (2002). Knowledge economy and educational. Taipei: Wu-Nan.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, F. H. (2006). Hierarchical linear modeling: Theory, method and application. Taipei: Yeh Yeh.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation on top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. S., & Huang, H. C. (2002). Constructing knowledge management programs for schools. Bulletin of Educational Research, 48(2), 37–68.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Marquardt, D. (2015). Innovative behavior. In R. Griffin (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in management New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0054
   Google Scholar