Creating a network between community college students in first-year seminars and in capstone courses using writing assignments

References

• Batty, C., & Sinclair, J. (2014). Peer-to-peer learning in the higher degree by research context: A creative writing case study. New Writing, 11(3), 335–346. doi:10.1080/14790726.2014.932814
   Google Scholar
• Boumlik, H., Jaafar, R., & Alberts, I. (2016). Women in STEM: A civic issue with an interdisciplinary approach. Science Education and Civic Engagement, 8(1), 66–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brave New Films. (2015). Life at a Walmart sweatshop Walmart: The high cost of low price, part 7. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI_pFD5yEcc
   Google Scholar
• Collings, R., Swanson, V., & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: A controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. Higher Education, 68(6), 927–942. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9752-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1997). High stakes and low stakes in assigning and responding to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (1997(69), 5–13. doi:10.1002/tl.6901
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2006). How to enhance learning by using high stakes and low stakes writing. In W. McKeachie (Ed.), McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers (pp. 192–212). Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122. doi:10.2307/356095
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (2013). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K. (2016). How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 127–140. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.987721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufer, D., & Young, R. (1993). Writing in the content areas: Some theoretical complexities. In L. Odell (Ed.), Theory and practice in the teaching of writing: Rethinking the discipline (pp. 71–104). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L. (1983). Writing as learning through the curriculum. College English, 45(5), 465. doi:10.2307/376844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., & Klemmer, S. R. (2015). Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 131–168). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• LaGuardia Community College Outcomes Assessment. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.laguardia.edu/Assessment/Resources/
   Google Scholar
• Maimon, E. P. (1981). Writing in the arts and sciences. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, L. C., Wang, E., & Correnti, R. (2016). Text-based writing assignments for college readiness. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 347–351. doi:10.1002/trtr.1489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrayne, S. B. (2006). Nobel prize women in science: Their lives, struggles, and momentous discoveries. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. H., & Soven, M. (1992). Writing across the curriculum: A guide to developing programs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, J. C. (2010). Peer assessment in an EFL context: Attitudes and correlations. In M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S. -K. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 second language research forum (pp. 89–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, E. (2013, October 3). Why are there still so few women in science? Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/06/magazine/why-are-there-still-so-few-women-in-science.html
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, P. S., & Absher, B. (2015). Factors influencing retention of developmental education students in community colleges. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(4), 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sukstrienwong, A. (2017). A web-based peer assessment system for assigning student scores in cooperative learning. TEM Journal, 6(4), 717–725.
   Google Scholar
• Windham, M. H., Rehfuss, M. C., Williams, C. R., Pugh, J. V., & Tincher-Ladner, L. (2014). Retention of first-year community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 38(5), 466–477. doi:10.1080/10668926.2012.743867
   Google Scholar
• Writing in the Disciplines at LaGuardia Community College. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.laguardia.edu/wac/
   Google Scholar