Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model

References

• Anderson, N. R., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovative research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/job.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, S. H., Song, J. H., & Kim, H. K. (2012). Teachers’ creativity in career technical education: The mediating effect of knowledge creation practices in the learning organization. The Korean Social Science Journal, 39(1), 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Baghaei, S., & Riasati, M. J. (2013). An investigation into the relationship between teachers’ creativity and students’ academic achievement: A case study of Iran EFL context. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(12), 1576–1580. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.14.12.803
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. (2011). An evidence-based model of work engagement. Current Direction in Psychological Science, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411414534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balker, B. (2015). The relationships between organizational climate, innovative behavior and job performance of teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Basim, H., Sesen, H., & Korkmazyurek, H. (2007). A Turkish translation, validity and reliability study of the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(4), 368–374.
   Google Scholar
• Bawuro, F. A., Danjuma, L., & Wajiga, H. (2018). Factors Influencing Innovative Behaviour of Teachers in Secondary Schools in the North East of Nigeria. Traektoria Nauki Journal, 4(3), 1007–1017.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasker, A., & Mishra, B. (2014). Organizational learning and work engagement: Study of an IT organization. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(3), 541–550.
   Google Scholar
• Bichelmeyer, B. A., & Horvitz, B. S. (2006). Comprehensive performance evaluation: Using logic models to develop a theory-based approach for evaluation of human performance technology interventions. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practice, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 1165–1189). Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Boukis, A. (2016). Managing innovation within organizations. In A. K. Goel & P. Singhal (Eds.), Product innovation through knowledge management and social media strategies (pp. 266–290). IGI Global. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9607-5.ch012
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. L., Ware, W. B., Rose, R. A., & Powers, J. D. (2007). Assessing the functioning of schools as learning organizations. Children and Schools, 29(4), 199–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/29.4.199
   Google Scholar
• Bramwell, G., Reilly, R. C., Lilly, F. R., Kronish, N., & Chennabathni, R. (2011). Creative teachers. Roeper Review, 33(4), 228–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.603111
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. (2015). School culture and leadership of professional learning communities. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(5), 682–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2014-0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Lee, C.-D., Lin, H., & Zhang, C.-X. (2016). Factors that develop effective professional learning communities in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai, A. A. (2013). Linking affective commitment to supervisor to work outcomes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 606–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2011-0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai, A. A., & Buckley, F. (2011). Work engagement: Antecedents, the mediating role of learning goal orientation and job performance. Career Development International, 16(7), 684–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111187290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppieters, P. (2005). Turning schools into learning organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760500093131
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M., & Berdrow, I. (2003). Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1087–1105 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechurch, L., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devilbiss, C., & Gilbert, D. (2005). Using casual relationship to prioritize actions. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 5(3), 62–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2005)5:3(62)
   Google Scholar
• Ellinger, A., Ellinger, A., Yang, B., & Howton, S. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms’ financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1010
   Google Scholar
• Faryad, L., Khorakian, A., & Nazemi, S. (2016). The effect of psychological empowerment on innovative behavior of employees regarding their work engagement. Development Management Magazine, 25, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Field, L. K., & Buitendach, J. H. (2012). Work engagement, organizational commitment, job resources and job demands of teachers working within disadvantaged high schools in KwaZulu-Natal. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2012.10874525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, C., Malycha, C. P., & Schafmann, E. (2019). The influence of intrinsic motivation and synergistic extrinsic motivators on creativity and innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2018). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawke, J. C. L., Gorgievski, M. J., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). Employee intrapreneurship and work engagement: A latent change score approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 88–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanbari, S., Ardalan, M., Zandi, K., & Saifpanahi, H. (2015).Validity and reliability of utrecht nine-item work engagement scale (UWES-9). Journal of Management and Development Process, 28(2), 181–197. https://jmdp.ir/article-1-1665-en.html
   Google Scholar
• Ghani, N., Shah Bin, T., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Antecedents of psychological empowerment in the malaysian private higher education institute. International Education Studies, 2(3), 161–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n3p161
   Google Scholar
• Ghardashi, F., Yaghoubi, M., Bahadori, M., & Teymourzadeh, E. (2019). Innovation capability in medical sciences universities: A qualitative study of Iran. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(16). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_235_1
   Google Scholar
• Gichohi, P. K. (2014). The role of employee engagement in revitalizing creativity and innovation at the workplace: A survey of selected libraries in Meru County – Kenya. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal).
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Litchfield, R. C. (2017). Idea collections: A link between creativity and innovation. Innovation, 19 (1), 80–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1270765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, G., & Wojahn, R. M. (2017). Organizational learning capability, innovation and performance: Study in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMES). Revista De Administração, 52, 163–175. 2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Gorozidis, G., & Papaioannou, A. G. (2014). Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grenda, J. P., & Hackmann, D. G. (2014). Advantages and challenges of distributing leadership in middle-level schools. NASSP Bulletin, 98(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636513514108
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2008). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Hajiloo, N. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Journal of Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology, 14(52), 61–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hakanen, J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, S., & McCallum, R. (2005). A comparison of the pencil-and-paper and computer-administered Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 605–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, M., & Watkins, K. (2003). Translation, validation and adaptation of the Spanish version of the modified dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Human Resource Development International, 6(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110087923
   Google Scholar
• Høigaard, R., Giske, R., & Sundsli, K. (2011). Newly qualified teachers’ work engagement and teacher efficacy influences on job satisfaction, burnout, and the intention to quit. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.633993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. C., & Chang, J. C. (2011). The role of organizational learning in transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 621–631. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9165-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. C., Chang, J. C., & Chen, S. C. (2014). The influence of support for innovation on organizational innovation: Taking organizational learning as a mediator. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 463–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0121-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. Ch., Chen, S., Chang, J., Chou, Ch. & Shen, Ch. (2009). Factors that influence school organizational innovation in technical institutes and universities. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 7(1) 71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Huysman, M. H. (2000). An organizational learning approach to the learning organization. The European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200397905
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2001). Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3069447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, B., & Lim, K. (2009). The Effects of organizational learning culture, perceived job complexity, and proactive personality on organizational commitment and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 16(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334195
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaycheng, S. (2016). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilipour, H., & Khanifar, H. (2018). Examining structural effects procedural justice and work engagement knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Khikmah, L. (2019). Teachers’ creativity in designing learning activities: Sustaining students’ motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1639.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations, Sustainability, 9(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleysen, R., & Street, C. (2001). Towards a Multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job-related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs, H. (2017). Learning and teaching in innovation: Why it is important for education in 21st century. Nevelestudomany, 2, 45–60. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.21549/NTNY.18.2017.204
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. J. (2010). The school principal: Visionary leadership and competent management. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• MacTavish, M., & Kolb, J. A. (2006). Encouraging teacher engagement: A new approach to performance improvement in schools. In F. Nafukho & H. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development 2006 Conference (pp. 1378–1385), Bowling Green, OH. The Academy of Human Resource Development.
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan, A., & Kaushal, K. (2017). Impact of innovative pedagogical teaching methods on students’ academic performance. New Nigerian Journal of Clinical Research, 6(10), 41–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 132–151.
   Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. (1997). The truth about burnout: how organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W., & Leiter, M. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 379–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masvaure, P., Ruggunan, S., & Maharaj, A. (2014). Work engagement, intrinsic motivation and job satisfaction among employees of a diamond mining company in Zimbabwe. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(6), 488–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v6i6.510
   Google Scholar
• McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration &Leadership, 39(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211416387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Innovative work behavior in vocational colleges: Understanding how and why innovations are developed. Vocations and Learning, 4(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-010-9049-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani, F., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2014). Individual and contextual determinants of innovative work behavior: Proactive goal generation matters. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadi, M. A., & Sajjadian, I. A. (2010). Study of factor structure, validity, reliability and normalization of learning organization dimension scale at the university. Educational Science, 3(12), 121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. K., Song, J. H., Yoon, S. W., & Kim, J. (2014). Learning organization and innovative behavior: The mediating effect of work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(1–2), 75–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2013-0040
   Google Scholar
• Parks, L. P., & Langford, P. H. (2008). Work-life balance or work-life alignment? A test of the importance of work-life balance for employee engagement and intention to stay in organizations. Journal of Management and Organization, 14(3), 267–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.837.14.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch, K. A., & Stevens, J. P. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, R. A., & Mansor, M. (2018). The influence of organizational learning on teacher leadership. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1254–1267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i4/4236.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, B., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijal, S. (2010). Leadership Style And Organizational Culture In Learning Organization: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 14(5), 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Tobias, L., Ton, D. J., & Denis, G. (2019). Tracing teacher collaborative learning and innovation adoption: A case study in an inquiry learning platform. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoue, C. H. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), International Conference of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 432–439), Lyon, France. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2019.432
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034
   Google Scholar
• Sawalhi, R., & Chaaban, C. (2019). Student teachers’ perspectives towards teacher leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1666430
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonza Lez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W., & Bakker, A. B. (2006). On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. In R. J. Burke (Ed.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Test manual for the utrecht work engagement scale [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Schechter, C., & Atarchi, L. (2014). The meaning and measure of organizational learning mechanisms in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 577–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13508772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, C., & Feldman, N. (2010). Exploring organizational learning mechanisms in special education. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(4), 490–516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011054734
   Google Scholar
• Schenke, W., VanDriel, J. H., Geijsel, F. P., Sligte, H. W., & Volman, M. L. (2016). Characterizing cross-professional collaboration in research and development projects in secondary education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(5), 553–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1158465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (1990). The leader’s new work: building learning organizations. Salon Management Review, 32(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4075.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (2006). The fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Tolvanen, A., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
   Google Scholar
• Sharifirad, M. S. (2011). The dimensions of learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ): A cross-cultural validation in an Iranian context. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5–6), 661–676. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111158251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuck, B., & Wollard, K. (2010). Employee engagement and HRD: A seminal review of the foundations. Human Resource Development Review, 9(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484309353560
   Google Scholar
• Simbula, S., & Guglielmi, D. (2013). I am engaged, I feel good, and I go the extra-mile: Reciprocal relationships between work engagement and consequences. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5093/tr2013a17
   Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. (2018). Job performance in the learning organization: The mediating impacts of self-Efficacy and work engagement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 249–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., Chermack, T. J., & Kim, W. (2014). An analysis and synthesis of DLOQ-based learning organization research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(2), 222–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313475995
   Google Scholar
• Sta Maria, R. F. (2000). Perception of learning culture, concerns about the innovation, and their influence on use of an on-going innovation in the Malaysian public sector [Unpublished Phd dissertation]. University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., & Kools, M. (2017). The school as a learning organization: A review revisiting and extending a timely concept. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2016-002s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroh, L. K., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (2002). Organizational behavior: A management challenge. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sundaray, B. K. (2011). Employee engagement: A driver of organizational effectiveness. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(8), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sutanto, E. M. (2017). The influence of organizational learning capability and organizational creativity on organizational innovation of Universities in East Java, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(3), 128–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, M. (2017). Creativity and innovation: Basic concepts and approaches. In M. Tang & C. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbook of the management of creativity and innovation (pp. 3–32). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813141889_0001
   Google Scholar
• Thepphawan, P. (2005). Learning organization: The practice of excellence for innovation. Naresuan University Journal, 13(3), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ Innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichnor-Wagner, A. A., Harrison, C., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2016). Cultures of learning in effective high schools. Education Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 602–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16644957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timanson, P., & Costa, J. D. (2016). Learning organizations and their relationship to educational improvement. In P. Newton & D. Burgess (Eds.), The best available evidence (pp. 99–112). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tri, H. T., Nga, V. T., & Sipko, J. (2019). Predicting overall staffs’ creativity and innovative work behavior in banking. Management and Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 14(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2019-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zyl, L. E., van Oort, A., Rispens, S., & Olckers, C. (2019). Work engagement and task performance within a global Dutch ICT-consulting firm: The mediating role of innovative work behaviors. Current Psychology, 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00339-1
   Google Scholar
• Vinarski-Peretz, H., & Carmeli, A. (2011). Linking care felt to engagement in innovative behaviors in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological conditions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., & Hollenbeck, J. (1995).Management of organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wamalwa, E. J., & Wamalwa, E. C. (2014). Towards the utilization of instructional media for effective teaching and learning of English in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(31), 140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, E., & Marsick, V. J. (1996). In action: Creating the learning organization. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, B., Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1086
   Google Scholar
• Yongxing, L., Hongfei, D., Baoguo, X., & Lei, M. (2017). Work engagement and job performance: The moderating role of perceived organizational support. Anales De Psicologia, 33(3),708–713. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.238571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar