Student strategies when taking open-ended test questions

References

• Ainsworth, A., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). What Kinds of Practice and Feedback Enhance Learning? In How Learning Works (pp. 121–152). Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, B., & Karrqvist, C. (1981). Ljuset och dess egenskaper [The light and its qualities]. Institutionen for praktisk pedagogik, Goteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J. R. (1986). Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: A classroom study. European Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 263–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20(6), 633–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 331–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90005-1
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in Bloom : Implementing Bloom ’ s Taxonomy to Enhance Student Learning in Biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 368–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, A., & Entwistle, N. (1992). Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations. Learning and Instruction, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(92)90002-4
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in Higher Education. Higher Education Research and Development, 16(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436970160202
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, A. (1999). A phenomenological perspective on some phenomenographic results on learning. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 30(2), 68–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156916299X00110
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2019). Using Phenomenography to Tackle Key Challenges in Science Education. Front. Psychol., 10, 1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E., Sas, M., & Sas, J. C. (2006). Test-Taking Strategies of High and Low Mathematics Achievers. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.3.144-155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsia, H. (1977). Redundancy: Is it the lost key to better communication? AV Communication Review, 25(1), 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard JK, Potts MA. & Couch BA. (2017). How Question Types Reveal Student Thinking: An Experimental Comparison of Multiple-True-False and Free-Response Formats. CBE - Life Sciences Education. 16, ar26, 2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0339
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B., Marton, F., & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as change between qualitatively different conceptions. In L. West & A. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 233–258). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 528–558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440601056620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. H., & Goetz, E. T. (1993). Strategic processing of test questions: The test marking responses of college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 5(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(93)90003-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. K., Wise, S. B., Rentsch, J., & Furtak, E. M. (2015). Cues Matter: Learning Assistants Influence Introductory Biology Student Interactions during Clicker-Question Discussions. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 14(4), ar41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (2002). Be brief and vague! and how bidirectional optimality theory allows for verbosity and precision. In D. Restle & D. Zaeferer (Eds.), Sounds and systems: Studies in structure and change: A festschrift for Theo Vennemann (pp. 439–458). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Thorndike Pysarchik, D., & Taylor, W. W. (2002). Peer Review in the Classroom. BioScience, 52(9), 824–829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0824:PRITC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughland, T., Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Young People’s Conceptions of Environment: A phenomenographic analysis. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220128248
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography - a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 28–49.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2015). Necessary Conditions of Learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain, L. (1983). Behaviour during examinations: A comparison of ‘A,’ ‘C,’ and ‘F’ students. Teaching of Psychology, 10(2), 69–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1002_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., & Masson, M. E. (1985). Altering memory representations through retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 371–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millman, J., Bishop, C. H., & Ebel, R. (1965). An analysis of test-wiseness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446502500304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momsen, J., Offerdahl, E., Kryjevskaia, M., Montplaisir, L., Anderson, E., & Grosz, N. (2013). Using assessments to investigate and compare the nature of learning in undergraduate science courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-08-0130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nist, S. L., & Hogrebe, M. C. (1987). The role of underlining and annotating in remembering textual information. Reading, Research and Instruction, 27(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19388078709557922
   Google Scholar
• Prevost, L. B., & Lemons, P. P. (2016). Step by step: Biology undergraduates’problem solving procedures during multiple-choice assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-12-0255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindler, S. E. (1980). The Effects of Skipping Over More Difficult Items On Time-Limited Tests: Implications for Test Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 989–998. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. E., Green, S. B., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., & Tollefson, N. (2006). College students’ study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self- regulation. Innovative Higher Education, 30(5), 361–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-005-9004-2
   Google Scholar
• Sato, B. K., Hill, C. F. C., & Lo, S. M. (2019). Testing the test: Are exams measuring understanding? Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(3), 296–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scouller, K. M., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple-choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 267–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331381870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegesmund, A. (2016). Increasing student metacognition and learning through classroom-based learning communities and self-assessment. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 17(2), 204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. I., Combs, E. D., Nagami, P. H., Alto, V. M., Goh, H. G., Gourdet, M. A. A., Hough, C. M., Nickell, A. E., Peer, A. G., Coley, J. D., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). Development of the Biology Card Sorting Task to Measure Conceptual Expertise in Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, (12)(4), 628–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-05-0096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenlund, T., Lyrén, P., & Eklöf, H. (2018). The successful test taker: Exploring test-taking behaviour profiles through cluster analysis. Eur J Psychol Educ, 33(2), 403–417. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0332-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2004). Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Learning Styles and the Problem of Instructional Selection—Engaging All Students in Science Courses. LSE - Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 197–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-07-0050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, P. R., & Bain, J. D. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessments. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research and Applications, 3(4), 227–240. researchgate.net
   Google Scholar
• Towns, M. H., & Robinson, W. R. (1993). Student use of test‐wiseness strategies in solving multiple‐choice chemistry examinations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 709–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, D. Watkins, D. (1982). Factors influencing the study methods of Australian tertiary students. High Educ, 11(4), 369–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenestam, C. G. (1982), ‘Children’s reactions to the word ‘death,’ ‘ Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New York
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, A. Y., Lawhorn, J. K., Lumley, T., & Freeman, S. (2008). Application of Bloom’s taxonomy debunks the ‘MCAT myth.’. Science, 319(5862), 414–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar