A Nonverbal Immediacy Treatment with Pre-Service Teachers Using Mixed Reality Simulations

References

• Allen, H. (2019). Self-adaptors alter adaptors and object adaptors in nonverbal communication. Retrieved from https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Self-Adaptors-Alter-Adaptors-and-Object-Adaptors-in-Nonverbal-Communication
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Witt, P. L., & Wheeless, L. R. (2006). The role of teacher immediacy as a motivational factor in student learning: Using meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500343368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C., & Shanahan, M. E. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F. (1978). The relationship between teacher immediacy and teaching effectiveness [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database. (Order No. 7900859).
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Annals of the International Communication Association, 3(1), 543–559. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. A., & Andersen, J. F. (2005). Measurements of perceived nonverbal immediacy. In V. Manusov (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words (pp. 113–126). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Forzani, F. (2010). Teaching skillful teaching. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, J. J. (2016). Developing a positive classroom climate. Idea Paper, 61, 1–9. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED573643.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bautista, N. U., & Boone, W. J. (2015). Exploring the impact of TeachME™ lab virtual classroom teaching simulation on early childhood education majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 237–262. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9418-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M., Cavanagh, M., Moloney, R., & Dao, M. (2011). Developing communication competence using an online video reflection system: Pre-service teachers’ experiences. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2011.614685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, E. G., & Kendall, B. (2014). A review of computer simulations in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.43.1.b
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Burroughs, N. F. (2007). A reinvestigation of the relationship of teacher nonverbal immediacy and student compliance-resistance learning. Communication Education, 56(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701530896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio Books: Cambridge, England.
   Google Scholar
• Chesley, G. M., & Jordan, J. (2012). What’s missing from teacher prep. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 41–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–340. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529009378813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. R., & Lignugaris Kraft, B. (2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivE™ to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSantis, W. J. (2018). The effect of data-driven feedback and coaching using a mixed-reality simulation in a preservice teacher education program (Order No. 10827096) [Doctoral dissertation, Western Connecticut State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L., Hynes, M., Hughes, C., & Smith, E. (2008). Implications of mixed reality and simulation technologies on special education and teacher preparation. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v40i6.6877
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Hughes, C. E., Hynes, M. C., & Straub, C. (2017). Using simulated virtual environments to improve teacher performance. Journal of the National Association for Professional Development Schools, 10(3), 62.
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Kennedy, M. J., Smith, S., Vasquez III, E., Rock, M., & Thomas, C. N. (2014). Use of technology in the preparation of pre-service teachers (Document No. IC-11). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations/
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Rodriguez, J. A., Lignugaris Kraft, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2013). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 37(1), 21–33. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413512683
   Google Scholar
• Dieker, L. A., Straub, C. L., Hughes, C. E., Hynes, M. C., & Hardin, S. (2014). Learning from virtual students. Educational Leadership, 71(8), 54–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobransky, N., & Frymier, A. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370193
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., & Martin, M. M. (2010). Instructor-student and student-student rapport in the classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903564362.
   Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R. G., Trienekens, N., & Kramer, L. J. (2011). Video feedback in education and training: Putting learning in the picture. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9144-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, F. F., & Manning, B. A. (1973). Self-confrontation reviewed: A conceptualization for video playback in teacher education. Review of Educational Research, 43(4), 469–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543043004469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall, M., Gall, J., & Borg, W. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed. ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, K. V., Vasquez III, E., & Pearl, C. (2012). Efficacy of individualized clinical coaching in a virtual reality classroom for increasing teachers’ fidelity of implementation of discrete trial teaching. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 502–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J. D., & Chakraborti, S. (1992). Nonparametric Statistical Inference: Third Edition Revised and Expanded. Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundel, E., Piro, J. S., Straub, C., & Smith, K. (2019). Self-efficacy in mixed reality simulations: Implications for preservice teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 54(3), 244–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2019.1591560
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1998). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (4th ed. ed.). Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. E., Voytecki, K. S., & Zhang, G. (2018). Mixed-reality teaching experiences improve preservice special education students’ perceptions of their ability to manage a classroom. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v11i2.7308
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. K., Simonds, C. J., & Cooper, P. J. (2002). Communication and teacher education: Exploring a communication course for all teachers. Communication Education, 51(1), 81–94. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520216497
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1981). Transfer of training: The contribution of coaching. Journal of Education, 163(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748116300208
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S., Bobzien, J., Maydosz, A., Gear, S., & Katsioloudis, P. (2013). The use of visual-based simulated environments in teacher preparation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v1i1.41
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D., & Ireland, A. (2016). Enhancing teacher education with simulations. TechTrends, 60(3), 260–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Smith, V. R., & Sorensen, G. (1988). Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on‐task demands. Communication Education, 37(1), 54–67. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. (2014). Focus on teaching: Using video for high-impact instruction [Kindle online version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, J. (2017). The impact cycle: What instructional coaches should do to foster powerful improvements in teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kyaruzi, F., Strijbos, J. W., Ufer, S., & Brown, G. T. (2019). Students’ formative assessment perceptions, feedback use and mathematics performance in secondary schools in Tanzania. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 278–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laerd Statistics (2015). Sign test using SPSS Statistics. Statistical tutorials and software guides. https://statistics.laerd.com/
   Google Scholar
• LeFebvre, L., & Allen, M. (2014). Teacher immediacy and student learning: An examination of lecture/laboratory and self-contained course sections. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v14i2.4002
   Google Scholar
• Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J., & Richmond, V. (1992). Increasing teacher influence through immediacy. In V. Richmond & J. McCroskey (Eds.), Power in the Classroom: Communication, Control, and Concern (pp. 101–119). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1994). Assessment of affect toward communication and affect toward instruction in communication. In S. Morreale & M. Brooks (Eds.), 1994 SCA summer conference proceedings and prepared remarks: Assessing college student competence in speech communication. Speech Communication Association. http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/measures/affect.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34(3), 214–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528509378609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Wadsworth Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd. ed ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282–292. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. W. (2000). Nonverbal communication in the classroom. Miller and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mursion, Inc. (2019a). Services. https://www.mursion.com/
   Google Scholar
• Mursion, Inc. (2019b). Virtual reality simulations for elevating educator performance. https://scheduling.mursion.com/download/14017-education-brochure-r2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nayernia, A., Taghizadeh, M., & Farsani, M. A. (2020). EFL teachers’ credibility, nonverbal immediacy, and perceived success: A structural equation modelling approach. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1774099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1774099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C., & Piro, J. (2016). Virtual simulations in a practice-based teacher education. The Field Experience Journal, 17(1), 94–118.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen, K. S. (2010). Fostering nonverbal immediacy and teacher identity through an acting course in English teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.1
   Google Scholar
• Pankowski, J., & Walker, J. T. (2016). Using simulation to support novice teachers’ classroom management skills: Comparing traditional and alternative certification groups. Journal of the National Association for Alternative Certification, 11(1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pas, E. T., Johnson, S. R., Larson, K. E., Brandenburg, L., Church, R., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2016). Reducing behavior problems among students with autism spectrum disorder: Coaching teachers in a mixed-reality setting. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(12), 3640–3652. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2898-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 46–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
   Google Scholar
• Piro, J., & O’Callaghan, C. (2016a). ED 211 simulation scenario. Unpublished document, Department of Education & Educational Psychology, Western Connecticut State University.
   Google Scholar
• Piro, J., & O’Callaghan, C. (2016b). TeachLiveTM scenario. Unpublished document, Department of Education & Educational Psychology, Western Connecticut State University.
   Google Scholar
• Reinke, W. (2018). The classroom checkup: Support and training in effective classroom management. Retrieved fromMay14 2019 http://classroomcheckup.org/teacher-home/
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Hickson, M. (2008). Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self-and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51(4), 504–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370309370170
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J. S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations Test Calculator. (2020). Social Science Statistics. https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/signtest/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Sign Test Calculator. (2020). Social Science Statistics. Retrieved from. https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/signtest/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., Dawson, S. L., Meglan, D., Cotin, S., Ferrell, M., Norbash, A., & Muller, J. (2001). Design principles for the use of simulation as an aid in interventional cardiology training. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies, 10(2), 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. B. (Ed.). (2000). The art of focused conversation: 100 ways to access group wisdom in the workplace. New Society Publishers: Philadelphia, PA
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. S., Tucker, J., Donehower, C., Pabian, P., Dieker, L. A., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. (2017). Impact of Virtual Simulation on the Interprofessional Communication Skills of Physical Therapy Students: A Pilot Study. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 31(3), 83–90. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201731030-00015
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Works. (2020). High Leverage Practices. http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, T., & Rich, P. (2012). Using video to analyze one’s own teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 678–704. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez, J., & Cano, J. (2008). The relationship between teacher immediacy and student motivation. Journal of Agricultural Education, 49(3), 76–86. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2008.03076
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Z., Vasquez, E., & Wienke, W. (2016). The impact of simulated interviews for individuals with intellectual disability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Su, P. (2018). A simulation study of workforce management for a two-stage multi-skill customer service center. International Journal of Operations Research, 15(1), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Schrodt, P., & Turman, P. D. (2010). Instructor immediacy: Creating connections conducive to classroom learning. The SAGE Handbook of Communication and Instruction, 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/036452042000228054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolfolk, A. E., & Brooks, D. M. (1985). The Influence of Teachers’ Nonverbal Behaviors on Students’ Perceptions and Performance. The Elementary School Journal, 85(4), 513–528. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/461418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, D., Titsworth, S., Worley, D., & Cornett-DeVito, M. (2007). Instructional communication competence: Lessons learned from award-winning teachers. Communication Studies, 58(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701341170
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, B., & Tobin, J. (2018). The use of video as a tool for reflection with preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(4), 328–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1516705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar