Fighting contract cheating and ghostwriting in Higher Education: Moving towards a multidimensional approach

References

• Alhassan, A. (2019). EFL postgraduate students’ learning needs on English-medium business programmes: An exploratory study. Language Teaching Research (pp. 1–18). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819857861
   Google Scholar
• Amigud, A., Arnedo-Moreno, J., Daradoumis, T., & Guerrero-Roldan, A.-E. (2018). An Integrative Review of Security and Integrity Strategies in an Academic Environment: Current Understanding and Emerging Perspectives Computers & Security, 76(11), 50–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2018.02.021.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, M., & Clare, J. (2017). Removing the opportunity for contract cheating in business capstones: A crime prevention case study, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0018-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Haeringen, K. V., Saddiqui, S., & Rozenberg, P. (2019). Contract cheating and assessment design: exploring the relationship. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 676–691. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1527892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Exemplary Academic Integrity Policy in Australian Higher Education. In BretagT. (Ed.) Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 464–478). Publisher: Springer.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_24–1
   Google Scholar
• Busch, P., & Bilgin, A. (2014). Student and staff understanding and reaction: Academic integrity in an Austrian university. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12, 227–243. 3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9214-2
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., & Appleton, J. (2001). Plagiarism: A good practice guide. Retrieved from JISC website: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/plagiarism/brookes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cinali, G. (2016). Handbook of Academic Integrity. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Middle Eastern Perspectives of Academic Integrity: A View from the Gulf Region (pp.114–131). Springer. (2016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_8.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of the second international plagiarism conference. United Kingdom, Gateshead.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2007a). Establishing a systematic six-stage process for detecting contract cheating. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Applications (ICPCA07), Birmingham, UK. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPCA.2007.4365466
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2007b). Assessing contract cheating through auction sites—a computing perspective. HE Academy for Information and Computer Sciences. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thomas_Lancaster/publication/229041361_Assessing_contract_cheating_through_auction_sites-a_computing_perspective/links/02bfe50f68928aba98000000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. G., & Clare, J. (2017). How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders? Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M., & Carroll, J. (2009). Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5(2), 58–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.v5i2.614
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small-scale research projects (4th ed. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Donald, M. (2006, June). Publish and be damned: Plagiarism via the internet is a growing problem – But academics are fighting back with their technology. The Guardian [London (UK)], 13. 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2006/jun/13/elearning.highereducation
   Google Scholar
• Draper, J. M., Ibezim, V., & Newton, M. P. (2017). Are essay mills committing fraud? An analysis of their behaviours vs the 2006 fraud act (UK). International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0014-5
   Google Scholar
• Draper, J. M., & Newton, M. P. (2017). A legal approach to tackling contract cheating. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-017-0022-5
   Google Scholar
• Ford, P. J., & Hughes, C. (2011). Academic integrity and plagiarism: Perceptions and experience of staff and students in a school of dentistry: A situational analysis of staff and student perspectives. European Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00695.x
   Google Scholar
• Furedi, F. (2017). Universities blame others for plagiarism. They need to look at themselves … The Guardian; 27 February 2017: 33.
   Google Scholar
• Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2008). Questioning Qualitative Inquiry Critical Essays. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., Bretag, T., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university staff. Studies in Higher Education 44 (11).1857–1873. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics and Behavior, 15, 213–231. 3 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1503_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holi, A. I. (2013b). Minimizing cyber-plagiarism through turnitin: Faculty’s & students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.2p.33
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2017). Institutional policies on plagiarism: The case of eight Chinese universities of foreign languages/international studies. System, 66, 56–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, G. (2014). Universities to tackle ‘essay mill’ plagiarism [Eire Region]. The Times; London (UK), 16(June), 2014: 10. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/universities-to-tackle-essay-mill-plagiarism-6kqxn2vlhj8
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. O., & Moore, A. (2010). Turnitin is not the Primary Weapon in the Campaign against Plagiarism. International Conference on Computer Systems & Technologies (pp.425–429). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1839379.1839454
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Z. R., Hemnani, P., Raheja, S., & Josh, J. (2020). Raising awareness on contract cheating –lessons learned from running campus-wide campaigns. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18, 17–33. 1 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09353-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. ( n.d). Assessing contract cheating through auction sites – A computing perspective. The University of Central England. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.8656&rep=rep
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2014). An observational analysis of the range and extent of contract cheating from online courses found on agency websites. In Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS), 2014 Eighth International Conference on. IEEE (pp.56–63). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2014.9
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2011). Understanding anti-plagiarism software adoption: An extended protection motivation theory perspective. ELSEVIER Journal, 5(2), 361–369. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education 6(1), 57–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608
   Google Scholar
• Lines, L. (2016). Ghostwriters guaranteeing grades? The quality of online ghostwriting services available to tertiary students in australia. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 889–914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1198759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, J. (2012). Growing pains in the desert. Science, 338(7), 1276–1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.338.6112.1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, J. (2012). Growing pains in the desert. Science, 338(7), 1276–1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.338.6112.1276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, C., Lang, C., Usdansky, M., Kanani, M., Jamieson, M., Gallant, T. B., & George, V. (2016). Institutional toolkit to combat contract cheating.http://undergrad.fiu.edu/academic-integrity/pdfs/Contract%20Cheating.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neil, C., & Shanmuganthan, G. (2004). A web-enabled plagiarism detection tool. Published by IEEE Computer Society, 6(5), 19–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2004.48
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, M., & Roberts, T. S. (2012). Plagiarism on the rise? Combating contract cheating in science courses. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pecorari, D. (2003).Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(4), 317–345. doi:Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Pecorari, D., & Petrić, B. (2014). Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 47(3) ( 2014), 269–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remenyi, D. (2016). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science, 112(5/6), 36–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. M., & McCarthy, G. (2017). Using Internet based paraphrasing tools: Original work, patchwriting or facilitated plagiarism? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(2). 1 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0013-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, S., Slade, C., Wong, K., & Whiting, B. (2018). ‘Just turn to us’: The persuasive features of contract cheating websites. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(4), 652–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1391948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahgahsemi, E., & Akhavan, M. (2015). Confessions of academic ghost authors: The Iranian experience. Sage Open, 5, 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/215244015572262.
   Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, S., Kostelidou, K., & Ramachandran, S. (2016). A close encounter with ghost-writers: An initial exploration study on background, strategies and attitudes of independent essay providers. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-016-0007-9
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, R. F., Bigna, S., & Smith, M. L. (2001). Plagiarism and the web. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(1), 193–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: A new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9150-y
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. J., & Newton, P. M. (2014). Turnaround time and market capacity in contract cheating. Educational Studies, 40(2), 233–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.889597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, H. (2018). New university plagiarism software to be launched in crackdown on 'contract' cheating. [Online], United Kingdom, The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2018/02/01/new-university-plagiarismsoftware-launched-crackdown-contract/
   Google Scholar