6,595
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CURRICULUM & TEACHING STUDIES

Secondary language personality and principled pragmatism in developing that personality in foreign language education at tertiary linguistic schools

ORCID Icon, , & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1898736 | Received 10 Mar 2020, Accepted 06 Feb 2021, Published online: 17 Mar 2021

References

  • Andarab, M. S., & Büyükyazi, M. (2013). Mismatches between teacher intention and learner interpretation; significance of non-native speaker teacher of English. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 30–18.
  • Benson, P., & Voller, P. (Eds.) (1997). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. Longman.
  • Burkert, A., Mumford, S., & Lackman, K. (2010). Symposium on grammar teaching in the post-communicative era. In B. Beaven (Ed.), IATEFL 2009 Cardiff Conference Selections (pp. 98–100). IATEFL.
  • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
  • Council of Europe. (2001) . Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Strasbourg.
  • Dam, L. (2002). Plenary: Developing learner autonomy – Preparing learners for lifelong learning. In A. Pulverness (Ed.), IATEFL 2002. York conference selections (pp. 41–52). IATEFL.
  • Damen, L. (1987). Culture learning: The fifth dimension in the language classroom. Addison Wesley.
  • Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Basil Blackwell.
  • Fotos, S. S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28 (2), 323–351. No.2. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587436
  • Glaserfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3–16). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gorman, A. (October 23, 2007). Surge in accent reduction classes speaks volumes (Immigrants and others wanting to sound more American flock to the courses. But some linguists are skeptical). Los Angeles Times. Part B (Home Edition). P. 1.
  • Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning. Pergamon.
  • Hope, D. (2006). American English pronunciation: It’s no good unless you’re understood. Cold Wind Press.
  • Hymes, D. (1986). Models for the Interaction of Language and Social Life. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Basil Blackwell Ltd.
  • Hymes, D. H. (1971). On Communicative Competence. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Karaulov, Y. N. (1987). The Russian language and the language personality. Nauka (the original is in Russian).
  • Khaleeva, I. I. (1989). The fundamentals of foreign speech comprehension teaching theory (Training of Translators). Vysshaya shkola (the original is in Russian).
  • Killick, D. (1999). Culture and capability: Crossing the divide. IATEFL Issues, No.148, 4–7.
  • Kohonen, V., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., & Lehtovaara, J. (2014). Experiential learning in foreign language education. Routledge.
  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice-Hall International (UK) Ltd.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(No.4), 537–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3588427
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond methods: Macrostrategies in language teaching. Yale University Press.
  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press.
  • Richards, J. C., & Rogers, T. C. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  • Richardson, V. (2003). Constructivist pedagogy. Teachers College Record, 105(9), 1623–1640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x
  • Sharma, P., & Barrett, B. (2007). Blended Learning. using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2001). Teaching etiquette communicative behavioral patterns to students of English as a foreign language. Atlantis, 23(2), 105–117.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2010). Must the Intercultural Approach, EIL and ELF oust CLL? IATEFL Voices, Issue, 217, 5–6.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2011). Experiential B.E. teaching/learning: A happy combination of Intercultural and communicative approaches. Business Issues, Issue, 78, 7–8.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2012). Constructivist blended learning approach to teaching English for specific purposes. Versita.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2017). Peer-teaching as a new type of interpersonal relationships in the language course for university students majoring in English. In Problems of interpersonal relations in conditions of modern requirements to quality of education and the level of professional skills of experts. Peer-reviewed materials digest (collective monograph) (pp. 17–19). Published by IASHE.
  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2018). Principled pragmatism, or well-grounded eclecticism: A new paradigm in teaching English as a foreign language at Ukrainian tertiary schools? Advanced Education, 10(10), 5–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.133270
  • Tarnopolsky, O., Kornieva, Z., Avsiukevich, U., Zhevaga, V., & Degtiaryova, U. (2014). Professional Basics. A textbook of English for 1st year students majoring in technology and economics. Student’s book and workbook. General and scholarly editors Oleg Tarnopolsky and Zoya Kornieva. Nova Knyga.
  • Tarnopolsky, O., & Kozhushko, S. (2004). Methods of teaching English for business communication. Lenvit (the original is in Russian).
  • Tarnopolsky, O., & Kozhushko, S. (2007). Business projects. Coursebook. Student’s book and workbook (Second ed.). Nova Knyga. Revised and Supplemented.
  • Tarnopolsky, O., & Sklyarenko, N. (2003). Lifestyle communicative behavioral patterns in the USA (Second ed.). INKOS. revised and expanded.
  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.