Examining gender differences in reading strategies, reading skills, and English proficiency of EFL University students

References

• Abbott, M. L. (2006). ESL reading strategies : Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance. Language Learning, 56(4), 633–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, P. G. (2017). EFL learners’ use of online metacognitive reading strategies and its relation to their self-efficacy in reading. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(2), 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Alami, M. (2016). Cross-gender comparison of metacognitive strategies utilized by Omani students in reading comprehension classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.4p.20
   Google Scholar
• Alsofyani, A. H. 2019. “Examining EFL learners ’ reading comprehension : The impact of metacognitive strategies discussion and collaborative learning within multimedia E-Book dialogic environments. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of South Florida.” University of South Florida. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7729
   Google Scholar
• Amini, D., Anhari, M. H., Ghasemzadeh, A., & Tarnopolsky, O. (2020). Modeling the relationship between metacognitive strategy awareness, self-regulation and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1787018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading english: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ardianingsih, W., & Salim, R. M. A. (2019). Perbedaan Gender Pada Kesadaran Metakognitif Dalam Strategi Membaca Bacaan Akademik. Jurnal Psikologi Teori Dan Terapan, 10(1), 74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v10n1.p74-84
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, Z. A., Nasir, C., & Ramazani, R. (2019). Applying metacognitive strategies in comprehending english reading texts. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 19(1), 138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v19i1.1863
   Google Scholar
• Azmuddin, R. A., Nor, N. F., & Hamat, A. (2017). Metacognitive online reading and navigational strategies by science and technology University students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), 18–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2017-1703-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L. (2015). Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and learning strategies in predicting academic success in students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, B.-Y., Afflerbach, P., & Han, H. (2018). Strategic processing in accessing, comprehending, and using multiple sources online. In L. G. Jason, I. B. Braasch, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 133–150). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627496
   Google Scholar
• Cho, B.-Y., Woodward, L., Li, D., & Barlow, W. (2017). Examining adolescents’ strategic processing during online reading with a question-generating task. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 691–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217701694
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053-23
   Google Scholar
• Cox-Magno, N. 2018. “Metacognitive reading strategy and emerging reading comprehension in students with intellectual disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Walden University.” Walden University. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2018.08.1.14.
   Google Scholar
• Dardjito, H. (2019). Students’ metacognitive reading awareness and academic english reading comprehension in EFL context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12439a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish, I. 2017. “Meta cognitive strategy use: Off or on in online reading.” In International conference on Literature, History, Humanities and Social Sciences (LHHSS-17), 24–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15242/icehm.ed0117029.
   Google Scholar
• Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive reading strategies awareness and metacognitive reading strategies use of EFL University students across gender. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 421–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.17026
   Google Scholar
• Fitrisia, D., Tan, K.-E., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Nyak Arief, J. T. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30(2004), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2020). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among University students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girli, A., & Halil, Ö. (2017). Metacognitive reading strategies in learning disability: Relations between usage level, academic self-efficacy and self-concept. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131890
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2010). Fluency in reading — Thirty-Five years later. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gusti, Y., Sari, I., & Ningsih, S. K. 2020. “An online reading strategies among EFL University students.” In The 2nd International conference and Innovation Exhibiti on Global Education (ICEGE), 192–198. Jakarta.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad, A. A. 2019. “Saudi ESL/EFL learners’ metacognitive online reading strategies in Arabic and English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].” The University of Memphis
   Google Scholar
• Hapsari, A. (2019). An analysis on reading strategies based on metacognitive awareness and gender. LINGUA PEDAGOGIA (Journal of English Teaching Studies), 1(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v1i1.18399
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-C. (2014). Online versus paper-based instruction: comparing two strategy training modules for improving reading comprehension. RELC Journal, 45(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214534797
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H.-C., Chern, C.-L., & Lin, -C.-C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (2009). Teaching second language reading. TESL-EJ, 12(4), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. 2016. “The use of metacognitive strategies among engineering students in reading academic texts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.” Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Kutluturk, S., & Yumru, H. (2017). Cognitive and metacognitive strategy training to enhance freshmen ’ s reading skills. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15640/ijll.v5n1a2
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-Tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(NOV), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2019). Processing of texts and videos: A strategy-focused analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., & Maarof, N. (2012). Empowering ESL readers with metacognitive reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 1250–1258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.058
   Google Scholar
• Marboot, K., Roohani, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). Investigating Iranian EFL students ’ metacognitive online reading strategies, critical thinking, and their relationship : A mixed-methods study. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 9(1), 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. 2017. “Metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use : Investigating the intermediate level ESL students ’ awareness of metacognitive reading strategies [Unpublished master thesis]. St. Cloud State University.” St.Cloud State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mohseni, F., Seifoori, Z., Ahangari, S., & Khajavi, Y. (2020). The impact of metacognitive strategy training and critical thinking awareness-raising on reading comprehension. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1720946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhlif, Z., & Amir, Z. (2017). Investigating the metacognitive online reading strategies employed by Iraqi EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 8(1), 372–385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no1.26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulyono, H., Saskia, R., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2021). Affective variables contributing to indonesian EFL students’ willingness to communicate within face-to-face and digital environments. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1911282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1911282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, N. A. (2014). Online metacognitive reading strategies use by postgraduate Libyan EFL students. Engineering and Technology International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 8(7), 2281–2284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1093955
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language research timeline. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peart, S. M. (2017). L2 reading: Strategies and gender preferences in the foreign language classroom. Lenguaje y Textos, 45(45), 17–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4995/lyt.2017.7437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2008). Strategic competence as a fourth-order factor model: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(1), 20–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701533596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, B., & Martin Noel, N. (2017). Strategic processing of academic text : Identifying a strategic reader. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 5(2), 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pookcharoen, S. 2009. “Metacognitive online reading strategies among Thai EFL University students. graduate theses and dissertations.” Indiana University. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-99151-068&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2005.10850177
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian University students. PROFILE, 11, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ramli, N. F. M., Darus, S., & Bakar, N. A. (2011). Metacognitive online reading strategies of adult ESL learners using a learning management system. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.3.195-204
   Google Scholar
• Reshadi-Gajan, E., Assadi, N., & Asl, H. D. (2020). Reading-metacognitive strategy awareness and use in reciprocal teaching settings: implementing a computerized RMSA system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(7), 1342–1371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120937437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rianto, A. (2021). Indonesian EFL University students’ metacognitive online reading strategies before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.18110
   Google Scholar
• Rostami Abusaeedi, A. A., & Khabir, M. (2017). EFL learners’ metacognitive reading strategies preferences in relation with their perfectionism regarding gender. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7(2), 108–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2017.72009
   Google Scholar
• Service, E. T. (2017). Test taker handbook. The TOEFL ITP® test taker handbook. ETS, NJ USA. https://www.ets.org/toefl_itp/about/
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Slik, F. W. P. V. D., Hout, R. W. N. M. V., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition : Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 Countries with 49 mother tongues. PLoS ONE, 10(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takallou, F. (2011). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance and metacognitive awareness. Asian EFL Journal, 13(1), 272–300.
   Google Scholar
• Taki, S., & Soleimani, G. H. (2012). Online reading strategy use and gender differences: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n2.173
   Google Scholar
• Taraban, R. (2011). Engineering Curricula : Analysis of students ’ text-processing skills and beliefs. Journal OfEngineering Education, 100(2), 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, B., Aziz, Z. A., & Absida, N. R. (2017). Improving Reading Comprehension Using MetacognitiveStrategies. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(4), 425–438.
   Google Scholar
• Wahyuni, Z., Ratmanida, & Marlina, L. (2018). The relationship of students’ metacognitive reading strategies awareness and reading comprehension: The case of the sixth semester student of English department Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP). Journal of English Language Teaching Volume, 7(3), 401–413.
   Google Scholar
• Wightman, M. 2020. “Gender differences in second language learning: Why they exist and what we can do about it.” University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2371
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. Y. (2014). Gender differences in online reading engagement, metacognitive strategies, navigation skills and reading literacy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenotz, V. (2012). Awareness development for online reading. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 85–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement : Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zulaiha, S., Mulyono, H., & Ambarsari, L. (2020). An investigation into EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: Indonesian teachers’ perceptions and classroom practice. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.1.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar