3,242
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY & COUNSELLING

The drivers of E-learning satisfaction during the early COVID-19 pandemic: empirical evidence from an indonesian private university

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2149226 | Received 10 May 2022, Accepted 16 Nov 2022, Published online: 27 Nov 2022

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–27. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  • Al-Azawei, A. (2019). What drives successful social media in education and e-learning? A comparative study on Facebook and moodle. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 253–274. https://doi.org/10.28945/4360
  • Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x
  • Al-Maroof, R. S., & Salloum, S. A. (2021). An Integrated Model of Continuous Intention to Use of Google Classroom. In Recent Advances in Intelligent Systems and Smart Applications. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 295 (pp. 311–335). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_18
  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Rahman, N. S. A. (2018). Use of E-Learning by University Students in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions: A Case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. IEEE Access, 6, 14268–14276. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2802325
  • Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online schedulers. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 323. https://doi.org/10.1145/588053.588057
  • Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.490
  • Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information and Management, 57(2), 103168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
  • Bervell, B., Umar, I. N., & Kamilin, M. H. (2019). Towards a model for online learning satisfaction (MOLS): re-considering non-linear relationships among personal innovativeness and modes of online interaction. Open Learning, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1662776
  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  • Bornsteinet al , 2013” to the referenceSampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards: In M. H. Bornstein, J. Jager, & D. L. Putnick (2013). 2013” to the referenceSampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Developmental Review, Vol. 33(4), pp. 357–370 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.003
  • Chen, H. J. (2020). Clarifying the impact of surprise in e-learning system design based on university students with multiple learning goals orientation. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5873–5892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10249-6
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2014). Extending the expectation-confirmation model with quality and flow to explore nurses’ continued blended e-learning intention. Information Technology and People, 27(3), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-0024
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2019). How does task-technology fit influence cloud-based e-learning continuance and impact? Education and Training, 61(4), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2018-0203
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2020). Students’ satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education and Training, 62(9), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2019-0245
  • Cheng, Y. M. (2020). Students' satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: Roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education and Training, 62(9), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2019-0245
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07269-010
  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (pp. 307–341). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.
  • Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066
  • Dai, H. M., Teo, T., Rappa, N. A., & Huang, F. (2020). Explaining Chinese university students’ continuance learning intention in the MOOC setting: A modified expectation confirmation model perspective. Computers and Education, 150(February), 103850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103850
  • Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC). Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 11(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.010
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  • Denson, N., Loveday, T., & Dalton, H. (2010). Student evaluation of courses : what predicts satisfaction? Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903394466
  • Dilas, D. B., Mackie, C., Huang, Y., & Trines, S. (2019). Education in Indonesia. https://wenr.wes.org/2019/03/education-in-indonesia-2
  • Dwidienawati, D., Abdinagoro, S. B., Tjahjana, D., Gandasari, D., & Munawaroh. (2020). Forced shifting to e-learning during the covid-19 outbreak: Information quality, system quality, service quality, and goal orientation influence to e-learning satisfaction and perceived performance. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(2), 1518–1525. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/93922020
  • Efiloğlu Kurt, Ö. (2018). Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1173–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9821-4
  • Ellis, R. A., Ginns, P., & Piggott, L. (2009). E ‐ learning in higher education : some key aspects and their relationship to approaches to study. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360902839909
  • Fatoni, Arifiati, Nurce, Nurkhayati, Etty, Nurdiawati, Ella, Fidziah, Pamungkas, Giantoro, Adha, Suhroji, Irawan, Purwanto, Agus, Julyanto, Octoberry, Azizi, Enji (2020). University Students Online Learning System During Covid-19 Pandemic: Advantages, Constraints and Solutions. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7), 570–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/srp.2020.7.81.
  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. (1982). Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Fuchs, M., Bossert, D., & Stukowski, S. (2013). Response Rate and Nonresponse Bias - Impact of the Number of Contact Attempts on Data Quality in the European Social Survey. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologiqu, 117(1), 26–45 https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106312465547.
  • Garrison, D. Randy (2016). The Community of Inquiry Theoretical Framework: In the Context of Online and Blended Learning. In E-Learning in the 21st Century. Routledge 220 9781315667263 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315667263/learning-21st-century-randy-garrison https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667263 .
  • Garrison, D. Randy (203 Social Presence 1st). . E-Learning in the 21st Century A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice (Routledge), (), 184 9780203166093 . https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203166093
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  • Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
  • Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
  • Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(October). https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00407
  • Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012
  • Hadoussa, S. (2020). Evaluation of e-learning system on higher education institutions in KSA: A survey at Saudi Electronic University. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2020.106285
  • Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In, Second edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.002
  • Hair, Jr., J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I – method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
  • Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
  • Herdlein, R., & Zurner, E. (2015). Student Satisfaction, Needs, and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study Approach at a European University. SAGE Open, 5(2), 215824401558037. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015580373
  • Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2018). Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y
  • Hult, G. T. M., Hair, J. F., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.17.0151
  • Hwee, J., Koh, L., Yen, R., Kan, P., Hwee, J., & Koh, L. (2020). Students ’ use of learning management systems and desired e-learning experiences : are they ready for next generation digital learning environments ? digital learning environments ? Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1799949
  • Irawan, D. E., Pangarso, A., Ridlo, I. A., & Fuad, A. (2020). Telaah bibliometrik pola penyebaran pengetahuan tentang COVID-19 di dunia. April, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12084339.v3
  • Isaac, O., Aldholay, A., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Online learning usage within Yemeni higher education: The role of compatibility and task-technology fit as mediating variables in the IS success model. Computers and Education, 136(November 2017), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.012
  • Islam, A. K. M. Najmul (2011). Extending information system continuance theory with system quality in e-learning context. 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2011, AMCIS 2011, 1(AIS), 50–59. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/8
  • Johnson, P., & Joanne, D. (2000). Understanding Management Research An Introduction to Epistemology.
  • Kebudayaan, Biro Kerja Sama dan Hubungan Masyarakat Kementerian Pendidikan dan (2020). Panduan Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran pada Tahun Ajaran dan Tahun Akademik Baru di Masa Covid-19. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/06/panduan-penyelenggaraan-pembelajaran-pada-tahun-ajaran-dan-tahun-akademik-baru-di-masa-covid19
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  • Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019). A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction. Online Learning Journal, 23(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455
  • Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs | Kuo | The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
  • Kwong, K., & Wong, K. (2019). Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis, Quadratic Effect Modeling, and Heterogeneity Modeling in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3. Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in 38 Hours. February, 35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331025056
  • Lee, R., Hoe Looi, K., Faulkner, M., & Neale, L. (2020). The moderating influence of environment factors in an extended community of inquiry model of e-learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1758032
  • Lim, J., & Richardson, J. C. (2021). Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Computers and Education, 161, 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063
  • Matthews, L. M., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part II – A case study. European Business Review, 28(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0095
  • Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). SAMPLE SIZE FOR SURVEY RESEARCH : REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. doi:10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
  • Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., & Tugwell, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  • Murad, D. F., Hassan, R., Heryadi, Y., Wijanarko, B. D., & Titan. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia (Face to face versus Online Learning). Proceeding - 2020 3rd International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering: Strengthening the Framework of Society 5.0 through Innovations in Education, Electrical, Engineering and Informatics Engineering, ICVEE 2020. IEEE. 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVEE50212.2020.9243202
  • Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. doi:10.1177/002224378001700405
  • Ooi, Keng-Boon, Hew, Jun-Jie, & Lee, Voon-Hsien (2018). Could the mobile and social perspectives of mobile social learning platforms motivate learners to learn continuously? Computers and Education, 120, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.017
  • Pangarso, A. (2016). Lecturer sociometric badge as digital platform in Indonesia higher education institutions from organizational effectiveness perspective. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4308–4311. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8134
  • Pangarso, A. (2019). Bagaimana meningkatkan kualitas universitas swasta, tempat mayoritas mahasiswa Indonesia kuliah. . https://theconversation.com/bagaimana-meningkatkan-kualitas-universitas-swasta-tempat-mayoritas-mahasiswa-indonesia-kuliah-111520?fbclid=IwAR0l4qfb-wg1miLTBu3WOkDUz_6Rrtuzof_uK2invQrO0xCv0GTzyURWD8Q
  • Pangarso, Astadi (2020). Indonesian private higher education agility, the big challenge. https://medium.com/@astadipangarso/indonesian-private-higher-education-agility-the-big-challenge-4477b9a32cbe
  • Pangarso, A., Astuti, E. S., Raharjo, K., & Afrianty, T. W. (2020). The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: the case of Indonesian higher education. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 2436–2455. doi:10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(65)
  • Parahoo, S. K., Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Harvey, H. L. (2016). Designing a predictive model of student satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 26(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/08841241.2015.1083511
  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-10632-001
  • Park, C. W., & Kim, D. G. (2020). Exploring the Roles of Social Presence and Gender Difference in Online Learning. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 18(2), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12207
  • Pérez-Pérez, M., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & García-Piqueres, G. (2020). An analysis of factors affecting students´ perceptions of learning outcomes with Moodle. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1114–1129. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2019.1664730
  • Pillay, H., Irving, K., Tones, M., Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing Tertiary students’ readiness for online learning Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing Tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310821
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  • Poort, I., Jansen, E., Hofman, A., & Jansen, E. (2022). Does the group matter ? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024
  • Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
  • Richter, N. F., Sinkovics, R. R., Ringle, C. M., & Schlägel, C. (2016). A critical look at the use of SEM in international business research. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 376–404. doi:10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0148
  • Rigdon, E. E., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. Marketing ZFP, 39(3), 4–16. doi:10.15358/0344-1369-2017-3-4
  • Ringle , 2015 : Ringle, ., Wende, S., Becker, J. M., et al (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com
  • Safsouf, Y., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2020). An Analysis to Understand the Online Learners’ Success in Public Higher Education in Morocco. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19(March), 087–112. https://doi.org/10.28945/4518
  • Sarstedt , 2019 : Sarstedt, Ringle, M., M., C., Cheah, J. -H., Ting, H., Moisescu, O. I., Radomir, L. et al (). Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SE Tourism Economics, Vol. 26(4), (pp. 531–554). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618823921
  • Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2), 102–120. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ938824
  • Tadesse, T., Gillies, R. M., & Manathunga, C. (2020). The effects of informal cooperative learning pedagogy on teaching effectiveness, task orientation, and learning satisfaction in undergraduate classrooms in Ethiopia. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1765320
  • Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and Controlling for Common Method Variance: A Review of Available Methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
  • Theresiawati, Seta, HenkiBayu, Hidayanto, AchmadNizar, & Abidin, Zaenal (2020). Variables affecting e-learning services quality in Indonesian higher education: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 259–286.: https://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4489
  • Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552
  • van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education, 50(3), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
  • Venter, Marisa, & Swart, Arthur James (2018). An integrated model for the continuous use intention of Microsoft Office simulation software. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) 17-20 April 2018 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, (IEEE), (pp. 320–329). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363246
  • Wold, H. (1985 Partial Least Squares). . Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, 6 (John Wiley)https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/0471667196.ess1914 https://doi.org/10.1002/0471667196.ess1914 .
  • Yarrow, N., & Bhardwaj, R. (2020). Indonesia’s education technology during COVID-19 and beyond. East Asia & Pacific on the Rise. https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/indonesias-education-technology-during-covid-19-and-beyond
  • Zareravasan, A., & Ashrafi, A. (2019, March). Influencing factors on students’ continuance intention to use Learning Management System (LMS). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2020, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357419.3357429
  • Zhao, Y., Bandyopadhyay, K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2020). Evaluating complex online technology-enabled course delivery: A contextualized view of a decomposed IS success model. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 46, 209–229. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04609
  • Zulherman, N., Pangarso, Z., & Zain, F. M. (2021). Factor of zoom cloud meetings: Technology adoption in the pandemic of COVID-19. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 816–825. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21726