3,756
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CURRICULUM & TEACHING STUDIES

The effects of schema strategy training using digital mind mapping on reading comprehension: A case study of Chinese university students in EFL context

ORCID Icon &
Article: 2163139 | Received 19 Apr 2022, Accepted 20 Dec 2022, Published online: 04 Jan 2023

References

  • Abeywickrama, P., & Brown, H. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Longman.
  • Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1977). A Schema-Theoretic View of Reading. Technical Report, 32.
  • Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effect of mind-mapping as a self-regulated learning strategy on students’ achievement in basic science and technology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(6), 163.
  • Ahmadian, M., & Pasand, P. G. (2017). EFL learners’ use of online metacognitive reading strategies and its relation to their self-efficacy in reading. The Reading Matrix: an International Online Journal, 17(2), 117–20.
  • Al Asmari, A., & Javid, C. Z. (2018). Role of content schema in reading comprehension among Saudi EFL students: EFL teachers’ perspective and use of appropriate classroom strategies. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p96
  • Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5, 33–68.
  • Ali, A. M., & Razali, A. B. (2019). A review of studies on cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies in teaching reading comprehension for ESL/EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p94
  • Al-Jarf, R. (2011). Teaching spelling skills with a mind-mapping software. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 53, 4–16.
  • An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.130-134
  • Armadana, O. P. (2019). Schema activation to promote students’ critical thinking in English reading comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya).
  • Arulchelvan, P., Veramuthu, P., Singh, P. K. P., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). iGen digital learners: Let’s Collaborate via Coggle. Creative Education, 10(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.101014
  • Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., Lukiati, B., & Purnomo, A. (2020). Mind mapping in learning models: A tool to improve student metacognitive skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 15(6), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.12657
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 23–28). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.
  • Baştuğ, M., & Demirtaş, G. (2016). Child-centered reading intervention: See, talk, dictate, read, write! International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 601–616.
  • Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Pearson Education.
  • Benbellal, A. (2020). The Effects of Brainstorming and Predicting as Schema Activation Strategies on the Algerian EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension: An Experimental Study at the Department of English, Blida 2 University, Algeria. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7, 62–78.
  • Bensalah, H., & Guerroudj, N. (2020). The Effect of Cultural Schemata on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11.
  • Bippert, K. (2019). Perceptions of technology, curriculum, and reading strategies in one middle school intervention program. RMLE Online, 42(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1565600
  • Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises.The. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46
  • Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind mapping technique in language learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.010
  • Buzan, T. (2018). Mind map mastery: The complete guide to learning and using the most powerful thinking tool in the universe. Watkins Media Limited.
  • Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. Dutton: New York, NY, USA.
  • Cahyani, R. D. (2015). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Mind Mapping. JoLLIET, 2(1).
  • Chinpakdee, M., & Gu, P. Y. (2021). The impact of explicit strategy instruction on EFL secondary school learners’ reading. Language Teaching Research, 1362168821994157.
  • Cho, Y. A., & Ma, J. H. (2020). The Effects of Schema Activation and Reading Strategy Use on L2 Reading Comprehension. English Teaching, 75(3), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.75.3.202009.49
  • Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
  • Duff, P. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Taylor & Francis.
  • Endley, M. J. (2016). Proficiency as a variable in Gulf EFL students’ employment of reading strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 183–223.
  • Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500131
  • Fiktorius, T. (2013). The use of mind-mapping technique in the EFL classroom. University of TanjungPura.
  • Friesen, D., & Haigh, C. A. (2018). How and why strategy instruction can improve second language reading comprehension: A review. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 18(1).
  • Gu, P. Y. (2019). Approaches to learning strategy instruction. Learning Strategy Instruction in the Language Classroom: Issues and Implementation, 22–37.
  • Habók, A. (2015). Learning to learn in Years 1 and 2 of Hungarian primary schools. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 43(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.783875
  • Habók, A., Magyar, A., & Hui, S. K. F. (2019). The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1616522. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522
  • Haiken, M., & Furman, L. R. (2022). Personalized Reading: Digital strategies and tools to support all learners. International Society for Technology in Education.
  • Hamid, R., Manda, M. L., Yassi, A. H., & Jubhari, R. R. (2020). Dominant Influence of Linguistic Knowledge in EFL Reading Comprehension: Schemata Analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6715–6721. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081236
  • Hashemi, A., Mobini, F., & Karimkhanlooie, G. (2016). The impact of content-based pre-reading activities on Iranian high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.15
  • Kadagidze, L. (2016). Mind Mapping as a Teaching Tool in Higher Education Language Learning Settings. Kultura i Edukacja, 4(114), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.15804/kie.2016.04.05
  • Kasemsap, B., & Lee, H. Y. H. (2015). L2 reading in Thailand: Vocational college students’ application of reading strategies to their reading of English texts. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15(2), 101–117.
  • Kusmaningrum, M. (2016). Using mind-mapping to improve reading comprehension and writing achievements of the 4th semester students of Stain Curup. The Journal of English Literacy Education: The Teaching and Learning of English as a Foreign Language, 3(2), 187–201.
  • Lardjane, S., & Nuutinen, A. M. (2014). Knowledge Representation for High Quality Learning.
  • Lee, C., & Chang, C. (2017). Using the networked peer support strategy to enhance reading comprehension for students with various thinking styles. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1501–1515. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00682a
  • Li, H., Gan, Z., Leung, S. O., & An, Z. (2022). The Impact of Reading Strategy Instruction on Reading Comprehension, Strategy Use, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy in Chinese University EFL Students. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221086659. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221086659
  • Liu, Y. (2015). An empirical study of schema theory and its role in reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1349. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.24
  • Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. State University of New York at Buffalo. http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564.Metacog.html
  • Long, D., & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks, 13(2), 1–7.
  • Ma, Y. (2021). The application of schema theory in the teaching of English reading in senior high schools. Region-Educational Research and Reviews, 3(3), 17–20.
  • Malekzadeh, B., & Bayat, A. (2015). The effect of mind mapping strategy on comprehending implicit information in EFL reading texts. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(3), 81–90.
  • Male, H., & Tias, H. A. (2019). Using Mind Mapping to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension at SMK BPS&K II Bekasi. UKI English Education Department Collegiate Forum October 23, 2015.
  • Maslakhatin, M. (2015). The Effects of Mind Mapping (MP) and Pre-Questioning (PQ) on the Students’ Reading Comprehension. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 2(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v2i2.3090
  • Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
  • Mills, C. (2019). The Effects of Schema on Reading Comprehension at Coleman Elementary. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/344
  • Mohaidat, M. M. T. (2018). The Impact of Electronic Mind Maps on Students’ Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 11(4), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n4p32
  • Murley, D. (2007). Technology for Everyone: Mind Mapping Complex Information. Law Libr. J, 99, 175.
  • Nasab, E., & Ghafournia, N. (2016). Relationship between multiple intelligence, reading proficiency, and implementing motivational strategies: A study of Iranian secondary students. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 4(3), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.4n.3p.34
  • Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Unpublished manuscript. Available at www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation
  • Nitchot, A., Wettayaprasit, W., & Gilbert, L. (2019). Personalized learning system for visualizing knowledge structures and recommending study materials links. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018817615
  • O’Donnell, M. P., & Wood, M. (2004). Becoming a reader. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Pang, E. S., Muaka, A., Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Teaching reading (Vol. 12). International Academy of Education.
  • Patel, P., Torppa, M., Aro, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2018). GraphoLearn India: The effectiveness of a computer-assisted reading intervention in supporting struggling readers of English. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01045
  • Pearson, P. D. (2009). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. Comprehension across the Curriculum: Perspectives and Practices in K-12, 279–314.
  • Pinninti, L. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies: An Indian context. The Reading Matrix. An International Online, 16(1).
  • Rahman, S. A. S. A., Yunos, D. R. M., Rahmat, N. H., Rahim, P. R. M. A., & Anuarudin, A. A. S. (2021). Coping with Reading Difficulty Using Socio-Affective Strategy. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 11(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2021.112.129.136
  • Ramirez, G., Fries, L., Gunderson, E., Schaeffer, M. W., Maloney, E. A., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2019). Reading anxiety: An early affective impediment to children’s success in reading. Journal of Cognition and Development, 20(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2018.1526175
  • Richards, J. C. (2003). Beyond methods. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context (pp. 167–179). Routledge.
  • Rubin, D. (1997). Diagnosis and Correction in Reading Instruction. Allyn and Bacon, Order Processing, PO Box 11071, Des Moines, IA 50336-1071.
  • Sabbah, S. (2015). The effect of college students’ self-generated computerized mind mapping on their reading achievement. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 11(3).
  • Semtin, S. A., & Maniam, M. (2015). Reading Strategies among ESL Malaysian Secondary School Students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 4(2), 54–61.
  • Sheikh, I., Soomro, K. A., & Hussain, N. (2019). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies, reading practices and academic attainments of university students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v6i1.2749
  • Siddiek, A. G., & Alfaki, I. M. (2013). The role of background knowledge in enhancing reading comprehension. World Journal of English Language, 3(4).
  • Stockwell, P. (2002). Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge.
  • Suhono, S. (2019). Providing Explicit Strategy Instruction to Enhance Students’ Reading Comprehension at English for Islamic Studies Class. Jurnal smart, 5(2), 81–93.
  • Suyitno, I. (2017). Cognitive Strategies use in reading comprehension and its contributions to students. Achievement. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(3), 107–121.
  • Tanggapan, C. T. (2018). Improving Students’ Motivation in Speaking through Collaborative Learning. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 3(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.3.2.10
  • Tatipang, D., Oroh, E. Z., & Liando, N. V. (2021). The application of mind mapping technique to increase students’ reading comprehension at the seventh grade of SMP. KOMPETENSI: jurnal Bahasa dan seni, 1(3), 389–397.
  • Tavakoli, H., & Koosha, M. (2016). The effect of explicit metacognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Porta Linguarum, 25, 119–133.
  • Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of metacognitive reading strategy awareness instruction for young learners of English as a second language. Literacy, 54(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12181
  • Trudell, B. (2019). Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of “reading culture” in African contexts. International Review of Education, 65, 427–442.
  • Turner, J. L. (2014). Using statistics in small-scale language education research: Focus on non-parametric data. Routledge.
  • Umami, R. (2016). The effectiveness of using digital mind mapping toward the students. Achievement in Writing Descriptive Text to the First Grader at Man 2 Tulungagung in Academic Year 2015/2016.
  • Vitro, M. (2018). iGen Myths and Why They’re Wrong. VITRO Agency.
  • Vitulli, P., & Giles, R. (2016). Mind mapping: Making connections with images and color. Delta Journal of Education, 6 (2), 1–10.
  • Wagoner, B. (2017). Concept of Schema in Reconstruction. In The contrastive mind: Bartlett’s psychology in reconstruction (pp. 115–141). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511920219.00
  • Wannathong, N. (2016). Cognitive reading strategies and EFL undergraduate learners. Journal of Graduate School Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, 13(61), 93–100.
  • Wen, Q. F. (2003). A successful road to English learning. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
  • Wenying, Z. (2022). The use of schema theory in the teaching of English reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 2(3), 66–69.
  • Xue, Y. (2019). The use of schema theory in the teaching of reading comprehension. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 7(4), 58–63.
  • Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second language on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820985236.
  • Yin, K. M. (1985). The role of prior knowledge in reading comprehension.
  • Zahedi, M., & Heaton, L. (2016). Mind mapping as a tool, as a process, as a problem/solution space. In DS 83: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE16), 8-9th, September, 2016 (Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity) Aalborg, Denmark, 2016 (pp. 166–171).
  • Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. Tesol Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
  • Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1).