Qualifying the science experiences of young students through dialogue - A Norwegian lesson study

References

• Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701749305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktamis, H., Hiğde, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10183a
   Google Scholar
• Akuma, F. V., & Gaigher, E. (2021). A systematic review describing contextual teaching challenges associated with inquiry-based practical work in natural sciences education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th) ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. D. C. Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938a). Experiential learning. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938b). Erfaring og Opdragelse. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, S., & Morais, A. M. (2020). Practical work in science education: Study of different contexts of pedagogic practice. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1547–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9743-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, N. (2021). Factors Influencing the Provision of Science Learning Experiences in Early Childhood Education in Ireland: A Case Study of Educators’ Perceptions and Practices. [ PhD dissertion], University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., & Alonzo, A. C. (2010). The role of content in inquiry-based elementary science lessons: An analysis of teacher beliefs and enactment. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9128-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerde, H. K., Pierce, S. J., Lee, K., & Van Egeren, L. A. (2018). Early childhood educators’ self-efficacy in science, math, and literacy instruction and science practice in the classroom. Early Education and Development, 29(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1360127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grave, W. S., Dolmans, D., & van der Vleuten, C. (1998). Tutor intervention profile: Reliability and validity. Medical Education, 32(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00226.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L., & Pramling, N. (2014). The educational nature of different ways teachers communicate with children about natural phenomena. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2013.809656
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2010). Rethinking the relationship between learning and development: Teaching for learning in early childhood classrooms. The Educational Forum, 74(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2010.483911
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A. (2017). The role of laboratory in science teaching and learning. In K. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education (pp. 355–368). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahoda, A., Selkirk, M., Trower, P., Pert, C., Kroese, S. B., Dagnan, D., & Burford, B. (2009). The balance of power in therapeutic interactions with individuals who have intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 48(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466508X360746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerrim, J., Oliver, M., & Sims, S. (2019). The relationship between inquiry-based teaching and students’ achievement. New evidence from a longitudinal PISA study in England. Learning and Instruction, 61, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordet, A. N. (2020). Anerkjennelse i skolen. En forutsetning for læring. Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, S., Kersting, M., Ødegaard, M., Kjærnsli, M., Olufsen, M., Lunde, M. L. S., & Sæleset, J. (2021). Kjennetegn på utforskende undervisning i naturfag. In M. Ødegaard, M. Kjærnsli, & M. Kersting (Eds.), Tettere på naturfag i klasserommet (pp. 47–67). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kassab, S., Al-Shboul, Q., Abu-Hijleh, M., & Hamdy, H. (2006). Teaching styles of tutors in a problem-based curriculum: Students’ and tutors’ perception. Medical Teacher, 28(5), 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590600627540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, M., Karlsen, S., Ødegaard, M., Kjærnsli, M., Olufsen, M., Lunde, M. L. S., & Sæleset, J. (2021). Ulike dilemmaer knyttet til utforskende undervisning i naturfag. In M. Ødegaard, M. Kjærnsli, & M. Kersting (Eds.), Tettere på naturfag i klasserommet (pp. 69–86). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Klette, K. (2013). Hva vet vi om god undervisning? Rapport fra klasseroms-forskningen. In R. J. Krumsvik & R. Säljö (Eds.), Praktisk-pedagogisk utdanning: En antologi (pp. 173–201). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (1988). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P., & Gustavsson, L. (1987). Initiativ och respons. Om dialogens dynamik, dominans og koherens. Universitetet i Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Loda, T., Erschens, R., Loenneker, H., Keifenheim, K. E., Nikendei, C., Junne, F., Zipfel, S., & Herrmann-Werner, A. (2019). Cognitive and social congruence in peer-assisted learning – A scoping review. PLo S One, 14(9), e0222224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, C. L., & Jenlink, P. M. (2019). The handbook of dewey’s educational theory and. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Matre, S. (2000). Samtalar mellom barn: Om utforsking, formidling og leik i dialogar. Samlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 93–127. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065002093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2010). Practical Work. In J. Osborne & J. Dillon (Eds.), Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp. 108–134). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2016). Facts and analysis of kindergarten, primary and secondary education in Norway. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training 2022. http://utdanningsspeilet.udir.no/2016/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2020). Curriculum for Natural Science (NAT01‑04). The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training 2022. https://www.udir.no/lk20/nat01-04?lang=eng
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R., & Prendergast, C. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M., Haug, B., Mork, S., & Sørvik, G. O. (2014). Challenges and support when teaching science through an integrated inquiry and literacy approach. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 2997–3020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.942719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olufsen, M., Lunde, M. L. S., & Kjærnsli, M. (2021). Praktiske aktiviteter i naturfag—Muligheter for økt elevaktivitet og faglig fordypning? In M. Ødegaard, M. Kjærnsli, & M. Kersting (Eds.), Tettere på naturfag i klasserommet (pp. 87–106). Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2015). Practical work in science: Misunderstood and badly used? School Science Review, 96(357), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(C), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Perlic, B. (2019). Lærekompetanse i grunnskolen. Hovedresultater 2018/2019. SSB Rapport 2019/18. Statistisk Sentralbyrå.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). The role of teachers in facilitating situational interest in an active-learning classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runnel, M. I., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä. (2013). Model for guiding reflection in the context of inquiry-based science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/13.12.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (2001). Læring i praksis. Et sosiokulturelt perspektiv. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. C. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equations modelling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70, 708–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199508000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P., Mortimer, E., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link‐making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.549619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu, Y. (2019). Lesson study as a vehicle for the synergy of research and practices: A Japanese perspective. In Resumen XV Conferencia Interamericana de Educación Matemática (Vol. XV, pp. 1–20). CIAEM-IACME. https://conferencia.ciaem-redumate.org/index.php/xvciaem/xv/paper/viewFile/1118/611
   Google Scholar
• Skaftun, A., & Wagner, Å. K. H. (2019). Oracy in year one: A blind spot in Norwegian language and literacy education? Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2019.19.01.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalstad, I., & Munkebye, E. (2022). How to support young children’s interest development during exploratory natural science activities in outdoor environments. Teacher and Teacher Education, 114, 103687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning as boundary-crossing in school-university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Coats, L. T., & Davidson, M. L. (2012). Promoting student interest in science: The perspectives of exemplary African American teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 124–154. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211426200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yew, E. H. J., & Yong, J. J. Y. (2014). Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9306-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & van Reet, J. (2021). How is ‘knowledge’ constructed during science activities? Detaching instructional effects of ‘playing’ and ‘telling’ to optimize integration of scientific investigations. Research in Science Education, 3, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09990-w
   Google Scholar