4,414
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

Teaching and learning using virtual labs: Investigating the effects on students’ self-regulation

ORCID Icon
Article: 2172308 | Received 13 Nov 2022, Accepted 19 Jan 2023, Published online: 19 Feb 2023

References

  • Abdelrahim, Y. (2021). How COVID-19 quarantine influenced online exam cheating: A case of Bangladesh university students. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.35741/.0258-2724.56.1.18
  • Adams, D., Sumintono, B., Mohamed, A., & Noor, N. S. M. (2018). E-learning readiness among students of diverse backgrounds in a leading Malaysian higher education institution. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 227–14. https://doi.org/10.32890/MJLI2018.15.2.7789
  • Adarkwah, M. A. (2021). “I’m not against online teaching, but what about us?”: ICT in Ghana post Covid-19. Education Information Technology, 26(2), 1665–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10331-z
  • Altmeyer, K., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Malone, S., Kuhn, J., & Brünken, R. (2020). The use of augmented reality to foster conceptual knowledge acquisition in STEM laboratory courses—theoretical background and empirical results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12900
  • Arista, F. S., & Kuswanto, H. (2018). Virtual physics laboratory application based on the android smartphone to improve learning independence and conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1111a
  • Asgari, S., Trajkovic, J., Rahmani, M., Zhang, W., Lo, R. C., & Sciortino, A. (2021). An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One, 16(4), e0250041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041
  • Azevedo, R., & Gašević, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated Learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96(2019), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.025
  • Badillo, J., Londino-Smolar, G., & Savvides, P. (2020). 7 things you should know about virtual labs. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2020/8/eli7174.pdf
  • Bankole, F., & Mimbi, L. (2017). ICT infrastructure and it’s impact on national development: A research direction for Africa. The African Journal of Information Systems, 9(2), 1. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol9/iss2/1
  • Baxter, G., & Hainey, T. (2020). Student perceptions of virtual reality use in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(3), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2018-0106
  • Bilen, E., & Matros, A. (2021). Online cheating amid COVID-19. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 182, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004
  • Billings, E., & Walqui, A. (2018). The zone of proximal development: An affirmative perspective in teaching ELLs/MLLs. In Retrieved August (pp. 6). New York State Education Department. https://www.wested.org/resources/zone-of-proximal-development/
  • Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25(2017). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968
  • Bose, R. (2013). Virtual labs project: A paradigm shift in internet-based remote experimentation. IEEE Access, 1(2013), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2286202
  • Cakir, N., Guven, G., & Celik, C. (2021). Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into the 5E learning model in biology teaching. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.82
  • Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154(2020), 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103910
  • Chiappetta, M. (2017). The technostress: Definition, symptoms and risk prevention. Senses and Sciences, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.14616/sands-2017-1-358361
  • Chick, N. (2013). Metacognition. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/metacognition/
  • Clark, K. R. (2018). Learning theories: Constructivism. Radiologic Technology, 90(2), 180–182. http://www.radiologictechnology.org/content/90/2/180.extract
  • Collins, R. (2020). Social distancing as a critical test of the micro-sociology of solidarity. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-020-00120-z
  • Eynon, R. (2021). Becoming digitally literate: Reinstating an educational lens to digital skills policies for adults. British Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3686
  • Fabregas, E., Dormido-Canto, S., & Dormido, S. (2017). Virtual and remote laboratory with the ball and plate system. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50(1), 9132–9137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1716
  • Flemming, K., Booth, A., Hannes, K., Cargo, M., & Noyes, J. (2018). Cochrane qualitative and implementation methods group guidance series—paper 6: Reporting guidelines for qualitative, implementation, and process evaluation evidence syntheses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97(2018), 79–85. PMID 29222060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.022
  • Fomunyam, G. (2019). ICT possibilities for primary and secondary education in Africa. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10, 12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3525951
  • Gal, Y. A., Uzan, O., Belford, R., Karabinos, M., & Yaron, D. (2015). Making sense of students’ actions in an open-ended virtual laboratory environment. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(4), 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500531a
  • Govender, R. G. (2021). Embracing the fourth industrial revolution by developing a more relevant educational spectrum: Coding, robotics, and more. In J. Naidoo (Ed.), Teaching and learning in the 21st century (pp. 30–49). Brill: SENSE. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004460386_003
  • Govender, R. G., & Khoza, S. B. (2022). First-hand user experience: Can Kaltura video come to the rescue of moodle during/post COVID-19? African Identities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2022.2082376
  • Govender, R., & Mpungose, C. (2022). Lecturers’ technostress at a South African university in the context of coronavirus (COVID-19). Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2125205
  • Guinaldo, M., de la Torre, L., Heradio, R., & Dormido, S. (2013). A virtual and remote control laboratory in moodle: The ball and beam system. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(17), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00021
  • Hickey, R. (2020). Creating videos with PowerPoint. Technology tools for teaching in higher education. The Practical Handbook Series Open Press.
  • Hu-Au, E., & Lee, J. J. (2017). Virtual reality in education: A tool for learning in the experience age. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 4(4), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2017.091481
  • Hussein, A. (2021). Information and communication technology for african higher education institutions: Challenges and opportunities. In I. Fayed & J. Cummings (Eds.), Teaching in the post COVID-19 era (pp. 129-138). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74088-7_12
  • Jasti, N. V. K., Kota, S., & Venkataraman, P. B. (2020). An impact of simulation labs on engineering students’ academic performance: A critical Investigation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2020-0108
  • Khan, R. A., & Jawaid, M. (2020). Technology enhanced assessment (TEA) in COVID 19 pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19–S4), S108. https://do.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2795
  • Khan, S., & Khan, R. A. (2019). Online assessments: Exploring perspectives of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9797-0
  • Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126(2018), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
  • Lim, W. M. (2021). History, lessons, and ways forward from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Quality and Innovation, 5(2), 101–108. https://www.inderscience.com/info/dl.php?filename=2021/ijqi-7348.pdf
  • Lynch, T., & Ghergulescu, I. (2017). Review of virtual labs as the emerging technologies for teaching stem subjects. Presented at the International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, (pp. 6082–6091). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1422
  • Miller, H. L., & Bugnariu, N. L. (2016). Level of immersion in virtual environments impacts the ability to assess and teach social skills in autism spectrum disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(4), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0682
  • Mofokeng, P., & Mji, A. (2010). Teaching mathematics and science using computers: How prepared are South African teachers to do this? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2010), 1610–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.245
  • Naidoo, J., & Govender, R. (2014). Exploring the use of a dynamic online software programme in the teaching and learning of trigonometric graphs. Pythagoras, 35(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v35i2.260
  • Naylor, D., & Nyanjom, J. (2021). Educators’ emotions involved in the transition to online teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1811645
  • NBC News. (2021) Survey more than 10000 students in fall 2020. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/education/remote-students-are-more-stressed-their-peers-classroom-study-shows-n1257632
  • Özgen, D. S., Afacan, Y., & Sürer, E. (2021). Usability of virtual reality for basic design education: A comparative study with paper-based design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(2), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09554-0
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
  • Pellas, N., & Kazanidis, I. (2015). On the value of second life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: A comparative study from the higher education in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9294-4
  • Reeves, S. M., Crippen, K. J., & McCray, E. D. (2021). The varied experience of undergraduate students learning chemistry in virtual reality laboratories. Computers & Education, 175(2020), 104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104320
  • Shah, R. K. (2020). Concepts of student-centred teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i3.2926
  • Soomro, K. A., Kale, U., Curtis, R., Akcaoglu, M., & Bernstein, M. (2020). Digital divide among higher education faculty. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00191-5
  • Tadesse, A., Eskelä-Haapanen, S., Posti-Ahokas, H., & Lehesvuori, S. (2021). Eritrean teachers’ perceptions of learner-centred interactive pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, Article 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100451
  • Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). The agency effect: The impact of student agency on learning, emotions, and problem-solving behaviors in a game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 147(3), 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103781
  • Trúchly, P., Medvecký, M., Podhradský, P., & El Mawas, N. (2019). STEM education supported by virtual laboratory incorporated in self-directed learning process. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 70(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.2478/jee-2019-0065
  • Urbina, S., Villatoro, S., & Salinas, J. (2021). Self-regulated learning and technology-enhanced learning environments in higher education: A scoping review. Sustainability, 13(13), 7281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137281
  • Verstege, S., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Diederen, J. (2019). Relations between students’ perceived levels of self-regulation and their corresponding learning behavior and outcomes in a virtual experiment environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 100(2019), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.020
  • Wästberg, B., Eriksson, T., Karlsson, G., Sunnerstam, M., Alexsson, M., & Billger, M. (2019). Design considerations for virtual laboratories: A comparative study of two virtual laboratories for learning about gas solubility and colour appearance. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2019), 2059–2080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09857-0
  • Wong, W. K., Chen, K. P., & Chang, H. M. (2020). A comparison of a virtual lab and a microcomputer-based lab for scientific modelling by college students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.157
  • Zheng, D., Schmidt, M. M., Hu, Y., Liu, M., & Hsu, J. (2017). Eco-dialogical learning and translanguaging in open-ended 3D virtual learning environments: Where place, time, and objects matter. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2909
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.