Understanding and planning for informal learning space development: A case study in Hong Kong

References

• Abramson, P., & Burnap, E. A. (2006). Space planning for institutions of higher education. Council of Educational Facility Planners, International.
   Google Scholar
• Bady, A., & Konczal, M. (2012). From master plan to no plan: The slow death of public higher education. Dissent, 59(4), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2012.0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1123230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha, S. H., & Kim, T. W. (2015). What matters for students’ use of physical library space? The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, D. C., Hsu, C. H. C., & Yau, K. T. (2021). Developing a taxonomy of informal learning space. International Journal of Education, 13(4), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v13i4.19016
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., & Uribe, A. M. (2005). A set covering formulation for agile capacity planning within supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 95(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., Roberts, P., & Taylor, I. (2015). University planning and architecture: The search for perfection. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. M. (2018). Space and embodiment in informal learning. Higher Education, 75(6), 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0186-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M., & Walton, G. (2016). Informal learning spaces (ILS) in university libraries and their campuses. New Library World, 117(1/2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-04-2015-0031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping; What are the differences, and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldratt, E. M. (1988). Computerized shop floor scheduling. The International Journal of Production Research, 26(3), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548808947875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldratt, E. M. (1990). The haystack syndrome: Sifting information out of the data ocean. North River Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajrasouliha, A. (2017). Campus score: Measuring university campus qualities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halla, F. (2007). A SWOT analysis of strategic urban development planning: The case of Dar es Salaam city in Tanzania. Habitat International, 31(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrop, D., & Turpin, B. (2013). A study exploring learners’ informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.740961
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, N., & Fadzil, N. H. (2013). Informal setting for learning on campus: Usage and preference. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.036
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, N., Fadzil, N. H., & Saruwono, M. (2018). Learning outside classrooms on campus ground: A case study in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 3(9), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i9.68
   Google Scholar
• Joiner, C. (1998). Concept mapping in marketing: A research tool for uncovering consumers’ knowledge structure associations. Association for Consumer Research. In Advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 311–322). Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Adams, P., & Gannaway, D. (2009, May). The impact of social learning spaces on student engagement. Queensland University of Technology. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference (Vol. 13, pp. 1-10). Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.512629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshram, D. S. (2006). Interface between city development plans and master plans’. ITPI Journal, 3(2), 1–9. https://www.itpi.org.in/pdfs/newsletters/newsletter-2006-apr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morieson, L., Murray, G., Wilson, R., Clarke, B., & Lukas, K. (2018). Belonging in space: Informal learning spaces and the student experience. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7, 2. https://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1667
   Google Scholar
• Niknazar, P., & Bourgault, M. (2017). Theories for classification vs. classification as theory: Implications of classification and typology for the development of project management theories. International Journal of Project Management, 35(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, P. (1998, February). Do we treat time and space seriously enough in teaching and learning? In Teaching and Learning in Changing Times. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Teaching Learning Forum. The University of Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, S. U. (1998). Theory of constraints. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579810199720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489363
   Google Scholar
• Waldock, J., Rowlett, P., Cornock, C., Robinson, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2017). The role of informal learning spaces in enhancing student engagement with mathematical sciences. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar