Smart teaching abilities of junior high school teachers in Thailand

References

• Abdullah, S., & Sheikh, H. (2016). Transforming science teaching environment for the 21st century primary school pupils. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 68–14. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1116210.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alhubaishy, A., & Aljuhani, A. (2021). The challenges of instructors’ and students’ attitudes in digital transformation: A case study of Saudi Universities. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4647–46621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10491-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkharusi, H. (2011). “Teachers’ classroom assessment skills: Influence of gender, subject area, grade level, teaching experience and in-service assessment training.”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 39–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256353761_Teachers'_classroom_assessment_skills_Influence_of_gender_subject_area_grade_level_teaching_experience_and_in-service_assessment_training
   Google Scholar
• Baba, S., & Aziz, Z. A. (2009). Smart teaching and learning strategies in pre-writing activities in Bahasa Malayu. Occasional Paper. UCLA: Center for Southeast Asian Studies. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/45g336rs
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2010). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist Journal, 37(3), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, L., & Klassen, R. M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30, (June):100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
   Google Scholar
• Benita, F., Virupaksha, D., Wilhelm, E., & Bige, T. (2021). A smart learning ecosystem design for delivering data-driven thinking in STEM education. Journal of Smart Learning Environments, 8(11), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00153-y
   Google Scholar
• Borawska-Kalbarczyk, K., Tołwińska, B., & Korzeniecka-Bondar, A. (2019). From smart teaching to smart learning in the fast-changing digital world. In Didactics of Smart Pedagogy L. Daniela Ed. Springer 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_2
   Google Scholar
• Commission, E. (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. The European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 1 November 2021
   Google Scholar
• Corporan, R. A., Nagata, J. J., García, A. V. M., & Martín, A. H. (2020). Perception of teachers on collaborative tools knowledge level mediated by ICT and their experience with students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(11), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i11.13121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (4th ed.) Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, N., Maher, J. M., Ebert-May, D., & Jensen, J. L. (2021). Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0250760. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. V., & Clark, A. (2008). Students’ preferred learning styles in graphic communications. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 72(1), 9–18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287613113_Students'_preferred_learning_styles_in_graphic_communications
   Google Scholar
• Froyen, L. A., & Iverson, A. M. (1999). Schoolwide and Classroom Management: The Reflective Educator-Leader (3rd ed.) Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Fulmer, I. S., & Barry, B. (2004). The smart negotiator: Cognitive ability and emotional intelligence in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(3), 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, D. C., Tania Broadley, J. D., & Wallet, P. (2018). Evolving learning paradigms: Re-setting baselines and collection methods of information and communication technology in education statistics. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.3403/30291930u
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Taraseina, P., & Miller, J. (1994). Assessing the instructional leadership of secondary school principals in Thailand. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(4), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345940050401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enhance student learning. Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00125.x
   Google Scholar
• He, L. (2020). The construction and application of smart class teaching with financial features: Taking Guangxi University of Finance and Economic as an example. Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies, 3(5), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.26689/pbes.v3i5.1529
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Chazan, D. (2012). On the instructional triangle and sources of justification for actions in mathematics teaching. International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44(5), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0438-6
   Google Scholar
• Hongxia, L. (2021). Coastline climate environment and coastal city English smart teaching simulation based on GIS system. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(2570), 09055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09055-2
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y.-S., & Evans, D. (2011). Attitudes towards inclusion: Gaps between belief and practice. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 136–146. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/34074/1/34074a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. S., Razak, A. Z. A., & Kenayathulla, H. B. (2013). Smart principals and smart schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103(2013), 826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.404
   Google Scholar
• Institute, D. Q. (2017). Digital intelligence (DQ): A concept framework & methodology for teaching and measuring digital citizenship. White paper. Singapore: DQ Institute. https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/DQ-Framework-White-Paper-Ver1-31Aug17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., & Troman, G. (2013). Managing creative teaching and performative practices. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanik, F. (2010). An assessment of teachers’ conceptions of critical thinking and practices for critical thinking development at seventh grade level. Doctoral dissertation Middle East Technical University. https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12612523/index.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurniawati, M. W., Anitah, S., & Suharno. (2017). Developing learning science teaching materials based on scientific to improve students learning outcomes in elementary school. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.398991
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Wang, Y., & Ma, C. (2021). The cultivating strategies of pre-service teachers’ informatization teaching ability oriented to wisdom generation. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(6), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i06.17089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-H., Wang, Q., Yu-Sheng, S., & Zhou, L. (2019). Effects of project-based learning on teachers’ information teaching sustainability and ability. Sustainability, 11(20), 5795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., Bai, H., Zhang, X., & Yuejie, L. (2021). “Study on blended smart teaching deeply integrating information technology.” In 2021 International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT 2021). pp. 56–60. Kyoto, Japan, July 23- 25.
   Google Scholar
• Manakul, T., & Tuamsuk, K. (2021). Digital intelligence for teaching in the digital environment. T.L.A. Research Journal, 14(2), 81–97. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NRRU/article/view/257700/176188
   Google Scholar
• Manduca, C. A., Verson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(12), 1600193. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600193
   Google Scholar
• Moazeni, S., & Pourmohammadi, H. (2013). “Smart teaching quantitative topics through the VARK learning styles model.” In The 3rd IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, pp. 1–7. Princeton, NJ, USA, March 9. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2013.6525222
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, D. F. (2001). Teacher personal and school culture characteristics in effective schools: Toward a model of a professional learning community. doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1302&context=gradschool_disstheses
   Google Scholar
• Sarnok, K., Wannapiroon, P., & Nilsook, P. (2019). Digital Learning Ecosystem by Using Digital Storytelling for Teacher Profession Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.1.1167
   Google Scholar
• Tian, J., & Xie, Y. (2017). Research on the architecture and strategies of Yunnan rural human resources smart development in the era of big data. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Information Management (ICIM), pp. 383–387, Chengdu, China, April 21-23. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOMAN.2017.7950413.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, H. (2020). An exploratory study of students’ perceptions of learning management system utilisation and learning community. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 2423. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuamsuk, K. (2019). KKU Smart Learning Project: Research Proposal. Smart Learning Innovation Research Center, Khon Kaen University. (Unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Twining, P., Raffaghelli, J., Albion, P., & Knezek, D. (2013). Moving education into the digital age: The contribution of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laar, E., Alexander, J. A. M., Van Deursen, J. J., Van Dijk, A. M., & De Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-century skills and 21st-century digital skills for workers: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Minden, A. M., Wallis, R. T., & Nardie, A. H. (1998). Charting the links between mathematics content and pedagogy concepts: Cartographies of cognition. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220979809601405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongjansau, S. (2020). The development of mathematics learning management skills through pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for mathematics pre-service teacher. Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Pibulsongkram Rajabhat University, 14(1), 278–293. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/GraduatePSRU/article/view/220108
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Liu, L., Wenfeng, W., Fang, Y., & Zhang, R. (2021). Exploring the informatization teaching ability of high school teachers in the Western Region of China. In The 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning, pp. 225–231. Tokyo, Japan, January 10-13. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450167
   Google Scholar
• Yu, M., & Liao, Y. (2021). The implementation strategies of smart teaching in college oral English court based on artificial intelligence. In International Conference on Internet, Education and information technology, pp. 607–612. Suzhou, China, April 16-18. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEIT53597.2021.00142
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Xuan, Y., & Zhang, H. (2020). Construction and application of SPOC‐based flipped classroom teaching mode in installation engineering cost curriculum based on OBE concept. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar