A systematic review of programmed learning approach in science education

References

• Abdulwahed, M., Hasna, M. O., & Froyd, J. E. (2015). Advances in engineering education in the Middle East and North Africa: Current status, and future insights. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A., & Appiah, K. N. (2020). COVID-19 and e-learning: The challenges of students in tertiary institutions. Social Education Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.212021422
   Google Scholar
• Abunamous, M. O., Boudouaia, A., Jebril, M., Diafi, S., & Zreik, M. (2022). The decay of traditional education: A case study under covid-19. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2082116. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Online Submission, 2(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
   Google Scholar
• Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2017). Critical success factors for eLearning in Saudi Arabian universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2016-0006
   Google Scholar
• Alzahrani, A. I., Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2019). Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617726123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Fretzin, L. (2004). Programmed instruction. http://lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/students/fretzin/epl1q2programmed.html.
   Google Scholar
• Andoh, C. B. (2013). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 136–155.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, K. V. (2012). Analyzing the influences of course design and gender on online participation. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(3), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Asio, J. M., Gadia, E. D., Abarintos, E. C., Paguio, D. P., & Balce, M. (2021). Internet connection and learning device availability of college students: Basis for institutionalizing flexible learning in the new normal. Studies in Humanities and Education, 2(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.48185/she.v2i1.224
   Google Scholar
• Avinash, A., & Shailja, S. (2013). The impact of ICT on achievement of students in chemistry at secondary level of CBSE and up board in India. International Journal of Science and Research, 2(8), 126–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ayanbode, O. F., Fagbe, A., Owolabi, R., Oladipo, S., & Ewulo, O. R. (2022). Students’ interactions, satisfaction and perceived progress in an online class: Empirical evidence from Babcock university Nigeria. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2060783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bean, M. V., Aldredge, T., Chow, K., Fowler, L., Guaracha, A., & McGinnis, T. (2019). Effective practices for online tutoring. Academic Senate for California Community Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., & O’dwyer, L. M. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1: 1 computing setting. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 91, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students perception of mobile learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University student perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20023. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8443
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, J., Brewster, G., & Godcharles, C. (1962). The Hamilton College Experiment in Programmed Learning. Hamilton College.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, O. R. (1962). A comparison of test scores of students using programmed instructional materials with those students not using programmed instructional materials. University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton, J., Brown, M., Costello, E., & Farrell, O. (2019). Pre-Induction supports for flexible learners: The head start online MOOC Pilot. A practice report. Student Success, 10(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i1.434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho, D. J., & Legare, J. M. (2021). Pivoting to Online Learning — the future of learning and work. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1239
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C. R., & Greenhill, L. P. (1963). Comparative research on methods and media for presenting programed courses in mathematics and English. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Casas, M. (2002). The use of Skinnerian teaching machines and programmed instruction in the United States 1960–1970. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED469942.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasiri, N., & Weerakoon, B. Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of allied health sciences undergraduates. (2022). Radiography, 28(2), 545–549. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I. (2006). An electronic textbook on instructional technology. http://viking.coe.uh.edu/~ichen/ebook/et-it/cover.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., Lijuan, P., Xiaohua, Y., Jingtao, R., Jianjun, Y., & Guodong, C. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare, 8(3), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, D. V. (1967). The contribution of programmed instruction to conventional teaching. Australian Journal of Education, 11(3), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494416701100305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. F., & Mertens, T. R. (1970). Writing and Testing Programmed Instruction. The American Biology Teacher, 32(4), 234–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/4443024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowder, N. A. (1959). Automatic tutoring by means of intrinsic programming. In E. Galanter (Ed.), Automatic Teaching: The State of the Art (pp. 109–116). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Darmody, M., Smyth, E., & Russell, H. (2021). Impacts of the COVID-19 control measures on widening educational inequalities. Young, 29(4), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/11033088211027412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does E-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organisational change to e-learning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500046255
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drijvers, P. (2013). Digital technology integration in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t). PNA, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v8i1.6120
   Google Scholar
• Dryden, G., & Vos, L. (2001). Learning Revolution: To change the way the world learns. Network Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duraku, Z. H., & Hoxha, L. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on education and on the wellbeing of teachers, parents, and students: Challenges related to remote (online) learning and opportunities for advancing the quality of education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353646219_Impact_of_the_COVID-19_Pandemic_on_Education_and_Wellbeing_Implications_for_Practice_and_Lessons_for_the_Future
   Google Scholar
• Eli-Chukwu, N. C., Igbokwe, I. C., Ifebude, B., Nmadu, D., Iguodala, W., Uma, U., Onyeneke, R. U., & Akudo, F. U. (2022). Challenges confronting e-learning in higher education institutions in Nigeria amid Covid-19. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2021-0346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fee, K. (2009). Delivering e-learning, a complete strategy for design application and assessment. Kogan Page. London and Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Fetaji, M., Loskovska, S., Fetaji, B., & Ebibi, M. (2007). Combining virtual learning environment and ıntegrated development environment to enhance e-learning. 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, IEEE: Cavtat, 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2011). Transportability of equiavalence-based programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florence, M. (2008). Effects of Practice in a linear and non-linear web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guła-Kubiszewska, H., & Wieczorek, M. (2004). Programované učení v procesu motorického učení [Programmed learning in the process of motor learning]. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica, 34(2), 71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Harnegie, M. (2015). Developing online learning environments in nursing education. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, by Carol A. O’Neil, Cheryl A. Fisher, and Matthew J. Rietschel. 15(1), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2015.983803
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, P. R. (1982). An experiment in programmed learning in physical chemistry for metallurgists. Journal of Chemical Education, 59(7), 588–592. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed059p588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hošková-Mayerová, S., & Rosická, Z. (2012). Programmed learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 782–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.141
   Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2006). The relationship between adopting a synchronous medium and participation in online group work: An explorative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820600800240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. L., & Chou, C. (2015). Students ‘perceptions of instructors ‘roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education, 81, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikram, I., & Asim, M. (2019). Correlation between programmed learning and metacognition: A study on experiential learning perspectives of secondary school teachers. International Journal of Experiential Learning & Case Studies, 4(2), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.22555/ijelcs.v4i2.2757
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hanley, G. P. (2006). An evaluation of computer instruction for promoting teachers’ greetings of parents by name. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.18-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, N., Beer, M., & Slack, F. (2015). E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Education & Training Studies, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.947
   Google Scholar
• Jaehnig, W., & Miller, M. L. (2007). Feedback types in programmed instruction a systematic review. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., Barman, B., Das, P., & Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokibasova, G. T., Tokmagambetov, D. S., & Sergazyuly, B. (2021). Использование математических методов для анализа результатов программированного обучения [Using mathematical methods to analyze the results of programmed learning] Collection of Abstracts of the All-Russian Scientific and Educational Forum with International Participation “Priorities in Modern Natural Science Education: Problems and Prospects. Yakutsk. Russia. (pp.118–124).
   Google Scholar
• Kromrey, D. J., & Purdom, D. M. (1995). A comparison of lecture, cooperative learning and programmed instruction at the college level. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurbanoglu, N. I., Taskesenligil, Y., & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Programmed instruction revisited: A study on teaching stereochemistry Chem. Educational Research Practice, 7(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90012C
   Google Scholar
• Lancker, W. V., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet, 5(5), 243–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. S. (2004). Teaching and Learning through Inquiry. V.A. Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lockee, B. B., Moore, D. M., & Burton, J. K. (2001). Old concerns with new distance education re-search. Educause Quarterly, 24(2), 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, A. P., & Soares, F. (2016). Flipping a financial mathematics course in a higher education institution. In: Proceedings of 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (ICERI2016) (pp.3634–3641). Seville, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42(42), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. K., Yanchar, S. C., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (2005). Learning from programmed instruction: Examining implications for modern instructional technology. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2002). A learner–centred approach to developing team skills through web–based learning and assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milošević, D., Bibić, L. I., Đukičin, S., Ivkov-Džigurski, A., & Ristanović, B. (2016). The possibilities of application of programmed instruction in the sixth grade of the second cycle of education in accordance with standards. Geographica Pannonnica, 20(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.5937/GeoPan1602096M
   Google Scholar
• Modan, N. (2020). Most educators are not equipped for student-centered learning. Retrieved fromeducationdive.com: https://www.educationdive.com/news/report-most-educators-arent-equipped-for-student-centered-learning/585012/.
   Google Scholar
• Mseleku, Z. (2020). Literature Review of E-Learning and E-Teaching in the Era of Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(5), 588–597.
   Google Scholar
• Mukadam, P., Vyas, S., & Nayak, H. (2014). Skinner’s Programmed Learning vs. Conventional teaching method in medical education: A comparative study. National Journal of Community Medicine, 5(1), 144–147.
   Google Scholar
• Naciri, A., Baba, M. A., Achbani, A., & Kharbach, A. (2020). Mobile learning in higher education: Unavoidable Alternative during COVID-19. Aqyademia, 4(1), ep20016. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8227
   Google Scholar
• Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: Students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783–793.
   Google Scholar
• Oginni, O. I., & Owolab, O. (2012). Integration of programmed instruction into mathematics and science teaching: A panacea to students dwindling interest in mathematics and science in Nigerian schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.1.3.199
   Google Scholar
• Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2011). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students’ conceptual understanding through science laboratory experimentation. Science Education, 96(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ospanova, A. S., Zhagufurova, B. M., & Pashaeva, A. B. (2021). Использование математических методов для анализа результатов программированного обучения [Using mathematical methods to analyze the results of programmed learning] Collection of Abstracts of the All-Russian Scientific and Educational Forum with International Participation “Priorities in Modern Natural Science Education: Problems and Prospects Yakutsk, Russia. (pp.125–134).
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruiz, R., & Aguaded, I. (2019). Dimensions of digital literacy based on five models of development. Cultura y educación, 31(2), 232–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, K., & Rowena, S. (2005). Business undergraduates learning online: A one semester snapshot. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 1(4), 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Pressey, S. L. (1927). A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society, 25(645), 549–552.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. A. (1962). A comparison of automated teaching programs with conventional teaching methods as applied to teaching mentally retarded students. Partlow State School and Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: What it is, how to do itBuilding autonomous learners: Perspectives from research and practice using self-determination theory (J. C. K. Wang, W. C. Liu, & R. M. Ryan’s, Eds.), Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Root, W. B., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2021). Towards a modern-day teaching machine: The synthesis of programmed instruction and online education. Psychological Review, 71, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00415-0
   Google Scholar
• Rutkaus, M. A. (1987). Remember Programmed Instruction? Educational Technology, 27(10), 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sadykov, T., & Ctrnactova, H. (2019). Application interactive methods and technologies of teaching chemistry. Chemistry Teacher International, 1(2), 20180031. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0031
   Google Scholar
• Sadykov, T., Ctrnactova, H., & Kokibasova, G. T. (2021). Students’ opinions toward interactive apps used for teaching chemistry. Bulletin of the University of Karaganda – Chemistry, 103(3), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.31489/2021Ch3/103-114
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, N. F., & Jalambo, M. O. (2022). Female students’ perception of m-learning in the higher education institutions of Palestine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2147775. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2147775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanasamy, C., & Yunus, M. M. (2022). A systematic review of flipped learning approach in improving speaking skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.127
   Google Scholar
• Saputra, W. N. E., Wahyudi, A., Supriyanto, A., Muyana, S., Rohmadheny, P. S., Ariyanto, R. D., & Kurniawan, S. J. (2021). Student perceptions of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A study of phenomenology. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1515
   Google Scholar
• Sari, P. (2015). Memotivasi belajar dengan menggunakan E-Learning [Motivate learning by using E-Learning]. Jurnal Ummul Quro, 6(2), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. (2012). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1), 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, G., & Levin, I. (2021). Teaching machine learning in elementary school. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31(C), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Shand, K., & Farrelly, S. G. (2018). The art of blending: Benefits and challenges of a blended course for preservice teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO2018.15.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Simamora, R. M. (2020). The Challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An essay analysis of performing arts education students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.38
   Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. I. M. (2010 Evolving the classrooms of the future: The interplay of pedagogy, technology and community. In K. Mäkitalo-Siegl, F. Kaplan, J. Zottmann, & F. Fischer (Eds.), Classroom of the Future Orchestrating Collaborative Spaces, (pp. 215–242). Sense: Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Stoffová, V. (2018). Didactic computer games- a playful form of teaching and learning. In: 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts. Sofia, Bulgaria, (pp.205–214). SGEM.
   Google Scholar
• Talyzina, N. F. (1973). Psychological bases of programmed instruction. Instructional Science, 2(3), 243–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 education and education technology ‘solutionism’: A seller’s market. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 863–878.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, R., & Osmić, I. (2006). Didactics. Denfas.
   Google Scholar
• Treve, M. (2021). What COVID-19 has introduced into education: Challenges facing Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1951616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verawardina, U., Asnur, L., Lubis, A. L., Hendriyani, Y., Ramadhani, D., Dewi, I. P., Darni, R. B., Tigus, J., Susanti, W., & Sriwahyuni, T. (2020). Reviewing online learning facing the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Talent Development and Excellence, 12(3), 385–392.
   Google Scholar
• Wahyuni, S. (2016). Development of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) Based Teaching Materials in Junior High School. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 117–120. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.2.2.117-120
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, M. (2003). Dissecting the “digital divide”: A case study in Egypt. The Information Society, 19(4), 297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., Knight, C., & Goodall, J. (2021). COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: Afflictions and affordances of emergency online migration. Higher Education, 81, 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00561-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, E. M.(1961). Programmed Learning in Engineering Education a Preliminary Study. Ire Transaction of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Su, L. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2012). A context-aware mobile learning system for supporting cognitive apprenticeships in nursing skills training. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7916/D82N59NB
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. C., & Chang, W. C. (2017). Ubiquitous smartphone platform for k-7 students learning geography in Taiwan. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 11651–11668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3325-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. H., & Su, C. H. (2017). Learner behavior in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning: IRRODL, 18(5), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Y., Hiroto, N., Kohei, H., Shota, S., & He, A. (2014). A C Programming Learning Support System and Its Subjective Assessment. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIT.2014.23.
   Google Scholar
• Zalazar-Jaime, M. F., Moretti, L. S., García-Batista, Z. E., & Medrano, L. A. (2021). Evaluation of an academic satisfaction model in E-learning education contexts. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1979047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelený, J., & Mannova, B. (2006). Historie výpočetní techniky [History of computing technology]. Scientia Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Zendler, A., & Reile, S. (2018). The effect of reciprocal teaching and programmed instruction on learning outcome in computer science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58(1), 132–144.
   Google Scholar
• Ziden, A. A., Ismail, I., Spian, R., & Kumutha, K. (2011). The effects of ICT use in teaching and learning on students’ achievement in science subject in a primary school in Malaysia. Malaysia Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, A. A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop programs for students. Science, 323(5910), 82–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar