2,609
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

Components of computational thinking in citizen science games and its contribution to reasoning for complexity through digital game-based learning: A framework proposal

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2191751 | Received 01 Feb 2023, Accepted 09 Mar 2023, Published online: 20 Mar 2023

References

  • Akkaya, A., & Akpinar, Y. (2022). Experiential serious-game design for development of knowledge of object-oriented programming and computational thinking skills. Computer Science Education, 32(4), 476–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2044673
  • Alexandra, A., Balázs, B., Butkevičienė, E., Mayer, K., & Perelló, J. (2021). Citizen social science: New and established approaches to participation in social research. In A. Land-Zandstra, L. Ceccaroni, R. Lemmens, J. Perelló, M. Ponti, R. Samson, K. Wagenknecht, & V. Katrin (Eds.), The science of citizen science (pp. 119–138). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_7
  • Alfaro-Ponce, B., Ibañez-Muñoz, C., & Sanabria-Z, J. (in press). Citizen science as a relevant approach to the challenges of complex thinking development in higher education: Mapping and bibliometric analysis. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice.
  • Alfaro-Ponce, B., Sanabria-Z, J., Rivero-Zambrano, F., & Ibañez-Muñoz, C. (in press). Citizen science’s influence on public policy for addressing complexity: A systematic review of tech-based projects in higher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research.
  • Amisha, G., Malik, P., Pathania, M., & Rathaur, V. (2019). Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(7), 2328. https://doi.org/10.4103/JFMPC.JFMPC_440_19
  • An, Y.-J., & Bonk, C. J. (2009). Designing digital game-based learning environments. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 53(3), 43–48.
  • Ardoino, J. (1991). El análisis multirreferencial. In Sciences de l’education, sciences majeures. Actes de Journees d’etude tenues a l’occasion des 21 ans des sciences de l’education (pp. 173–181). Colección Recherches et Sciences de l’Education. http://publicaciones.anuies.mx/pdfs/revista/Revista87_S1A1ES.pdf
  • Ardoino, J. (2005). Complejidad y formación : pensar la educación desde una mirada epistemológica. Novedades Educativas.
  • Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R., & de Gloria, A. (2015). Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
  • Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
  • Baaden, M., Delalande, O., Ferey, N., Pasquali, S., Waldispühl, J., & Taly, A. (2018). Ten simple rules to create a serious game, illustrated with examples from structural biology. PLoS Computational Biology, 14(3), e1005955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005955
  • Baird, A. M., & Parayitam, S. (2019). Employers’ ratings of importance of skills and competencies college graduates need to get hired: Evidence from the New England region of USA. Education + Training, 61(5), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2018-0250
  • Baldwin, A., Fröhlich, C., & Rothe, D. (2019). From climate migration to Anthropocene mobilities: Shifting the debate. Mobilities, 14(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1620510
  • Bascopé, M., Perasso, P., & Reiss, K. (2019). Systematic review of education for sustainable development at an early stage: Cornerstones and pedagogical approaches for teacher professional development. Sustainability, 11(3), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11030719
  • Bettini, G. (2019). And yet it moves! (Climate) migration as a symptom in the Anthropocene. Mobilities, 14(3), 336–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2019.1612613
  • Bonfield, C. A., Salter, M., Longmuir, A., Benson, M., & Adachi, C. (2020). Transformation or evolution?: Education 4.0, teaching and learning in the digital age. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1816847
  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
  • Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343(6178), 1436–1437. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1251554
  • Burns, R. (2020). The adult learner at work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003134213
  • Butler-Adam, J. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and education. South African Journal of Science, 114(5/6). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2018/a0271
  • Carbonero, F., Ernst, E., & Weber, E. (2020). Robots worldwide: The impact of automation on employment and trade. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/224602
  • Chen, Y.-C., Lu, Y.-L., & Lien, C.-J. (2021). Learning environments with different levels of technological engagement: A comparison of game-based, video-based, and traditional instruction on students’ learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1363–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1628781
  • Chen, C. C., & Tu, H. Y. (2021). The effect of digital game-based learning on learning motivation and performance under social cognitive theory and entrepreneurial thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 5477. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750711
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/e+Learning+and+the+Science+of+Instruction%3A+Proven+Guidelines+for+Consumers+and+Designers+of+Multimedia+Learning%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781119158660
  • Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
  • Cordeiro De Oliveira, L., Guerino, G. C., Cordeiro De Oliveira, L., & Pimentel, A. R. (2022). Information and communication technologies in Education 4.0 paradigm: A systematic mapping study. Informatics in Education. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2023.03
  • da Silva, T. C., de Melo, J. B., & Tedesco, P. (2020). The creative process in the development of computational thinking in higher education. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 215–226). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009346502150226
  • Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). Tampere, Finland.
  • Doleck, T., Bazelais, P., Lemay, D. J., Saxena, A., & Basnet, R. B. (2017). Algorithmic thinking, cooperativity, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving: Exploring the relationship between computational thinking skills and academic performance. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40692-017-0090-9
  • ECSA. (2015). Ten principles of citizen science. European Citizen Science Association. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XPR2N
  • Egersdorfer, D. (2016). Using digital game-based learning to engage science students: The case of minecraft. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0305061
  • Einsiedel, E. F. (2021). Public participation in science and technology: Dialogue, disputations, and collaborations. Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 267–290. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242-15/PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION-SCIENCE-TECHNOLOGY-EDNA-EINSIEDEL
  • Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019
  • Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122263
  • Fernandes, K. T., da Silva Aranha, E. H., Lucena, M. J. N. R., & de Souza Fernandes, G. L. (2020). Developing computational thinking and reading and writing skills through an approach for creating games. 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274065
  • French, R., Imms, W., & Mahat, M. (2020). Case studies on the transition from traditional classrooms to innovative learning environments: Emerging strategies for success. Improving Schools, 23(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219894408
  • Frigerio, D., Richter, A., Per, E., Pruse, B., & Vohland, K. (2021). Citizen science in the natural sciences. The Science of Citizen Science, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_5
  • Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2020). Challenge-based learning in higher education: An exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
  • Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
  • Gomollón-Bel, F. (2019). Ten chemical innovations that will change our world: IUPAC identifies emerging technologies in Chemistry with potential to make our planet more sustainable. Chemistry International, 41(2), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/ci-2019-0203
  • Graham, E. A., Henderson, S., & Schloss, A. (2011). Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research. Eos, 92(38), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO380002
  • Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2020.101586
  • Hägg, G., & Gabrielsson, J. (2020). A systematic literature review of the evolution of pedagogy in entrepreneurial education research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(5), 829–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2018-0272
  • Haklay, M. (2018). Participatory citizen science. In M. Haklay, S. Hecker, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Citizen science: Innovation in open science, society, and policy (pp. 52–62). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339
  • Halasa, S., Abusalim, N., Rayyan, M., Constantino, R. E., Nassar, O., Amre, H., Sharab, M., & Qadri, I. (2020). Comparing student achievement in traditional learning with a combination of blended and flipped learning. Nursing Open, 7(4), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.492
  • Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
  • Heiss, R., & Matthes, J. (2017). Citizen science in the social sciences: A call for more evidence. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.26.1.7
  • He, L., & Li, N. (2020). The linkages between life expectancy and economic growth: Some new evidence. Empirical Economics, 58(5), 2381–2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1612-7
  • Humlum, A. (2019). Robot adoption and labor market dynamics. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Robot-Adoption-and-Labor-Market-Dynamics-Humlum/9c546d533fcb3f0df9974dc78332b94a53a629cf
  • Iacovides, I., Jennett, C., Cornish-Trestrail, C., & Cox, A. L. (2013, April). Do games attract or sustain engagement in citizen science? A study of volunteer motivations. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 1101–1106). https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468553
  • Iyawa, G. E., Akinmoyeje, B. A., Kays, R., Mutelo, S., & Ipinge, R. (2021). Women as citizen scientists: Identifying potential digital solutions for addressing gender-based challenges. 2021 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 1–8).
  • Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  • Johnson, B. A., Mader, A. D., Dasgupta, R., & Kumar, P. (2020). Citizen science and invasive alien species: An analysis of citizen science initiatives using information and communications technology (ICT) to collect invasive alien species observations. Global Ecology and Conservation, 21, e00812. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GECCO.2019.E00812
  • Kayembe, C., & Nel, D. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for education in the fourth industrial revolution. Science Translational Medicine, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw9414
  • Keser, H., & Semerci, A. (2019). Technology trends, Education 4.0 and beyond. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 9(3), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v9i3.4269
  • Kim, Y. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2019). Game-based assessment: The past ten years and moving forward. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15569-8_1
  • Kim, J., & Park, C.-Y. (2020). Education, skill training, and lifelong learning in the era of technological revolution. https://doi.org/10.22617/WPS200008-2
  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9/COVER
  • Krishnakumaryamma, A. N., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2018). Technology-mediated pedagogies for skill acquisition toward sustainability education. In O. Bernad Cavero & L.-C. Núria (Eds.), New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century - Contributions of research in education (pp. 21–32). InTechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74336
  • Kules, B. (2016). Computational thinking is critical thinking: Connecting to university discourse, goals, and learning outcomes. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/PRA2.2016.14505301092
  • Kullenberg, C., & Kasperowski, D. (2016). What is citizen science?-A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(1), 147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Firestone, J., & Etopio, E. (2018). A meta-analysis with examination of moderators of student cognition, affect, and learning outcomes while using serious educational games, serious games, and simulations. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2017.10.040
  • Liu, H.-Y., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., & Grossberndt, S. (2021). Citizen science platforms. The Science of Citizen Science, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4_22
  • Lozano, R., Barreiro-Gen, M., Lozano, F. J., & Sammalisto, K. (2019). Teaching sustainability in European higher education institutions: Assessing the connections between competences and pedagogical approaches. Sustainability, 11(6), 1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061602
  • Magno de Jesus, Â., & Silveira, I. F. (2021). Game-based collaborative learning framework for computational thinking development. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 99(99), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.17533/UDEA.REDIN.20200690
  • Martin, F., Dennen, V. P., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Education Tech Research Dev, 68, 1613–1633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09812-2
  • Mavlonov, R. (2022). Integration of pedagogical approaches and their application in the educational process. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 3(6), 25–27. https://www.cajssh.centralasianstudies.org/index.php/CAJSSH/article/view/322
  • Menon, D., Romero, M., & Viéville, T. (2019). Computational thinking development and assessment through tabletop escape games. International Journal of Serious Games, 6(4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i4.319
  • Miller, J. A., Horn, B., Guthrie, M., Romano, J., Geva, G., David, C., Sterling, A. R., & Cooper, S. (2021). How do players and developers of citizen science games conceptualize skill chains? Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CHI PLAY) (pp. 1–29). https://doi.org/10.1145/3474671
  • Miller, J. A., Narayan, U., Hantsbarger, M., Cooper, S., & El-Nasr, M. S. (2019). Expertise and engagement. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3337735
  • Moore, L. L., & Rudd, R. D. (2004). LEADERSHIP SKILLS and COMPETENCIES for EXTENSION DIRECTORS and ADMINISTRATORS introduction and theoretical framework. Journal of Agricultural Education, 22(3), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2004.03022
  • Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hämäläinen, R., & de Wever, B. (2019). Lifelong learning: Formal, nonformal, and informal learning in the context of the use of problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1759–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12807
  • Patiño, A., Ramírez-Montoya, S., & Buenestado-Fernández, M. (2023). Open Access Smart Learning Environments Active learning and Education 4.0 for complex thinking training: Analysis of two case studies in open education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00229-x
  • Prensky, M. (2006). ”Don’t bother me, Mom, I’m learning!”: How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first-century success and how you can help. In 2006 (1st ed.) (pp. 254). Paragon House.
  • Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st-century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.05.023
  • Quinlivan, L., Chapman, D. V., & Sullivan, T. (2020). Validating citizen science monitoring of ambient water quality for the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. The Science of the Total Environment, 699, 134255. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.134255
  • Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Sanabria-Z, J., & Miranda, J. (2022). Complex thinking in the framework of Education 4.0 and open innovation—A systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation, Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC8010004
  • Rebele, J. E., & St. Pierre, E. K. (2019). A commentary on learning objectives for accounting education programs: The importance of soft skills and technical knowledge. Journal of Accounting Education, 48, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACCEDU.2019.07.002
  • Rios, J. A., Ling, G., Pugh, R., Becker, D., & Bacall, A. (2020). Identifying critical 21st-century skills for workplace success: A content analysis of job advertisements. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19890600
  • Romero, M., Dumont, L., Barma, S., Daniel, S., Ferrer, M., Hénaire, V., Răileanu, M.-B., Lepage, A., Lille, B., & Patino, A. (2020). Digital games and learning. JFD Éditions.
  • Rowe, E., Almeda, M. V., Asbell-Clarke, J., Scruggs, R., Baker, R., Bardar, E., & Gasca, S. (2021). Assessing implicit computational thinking in Zoombinis puzzle gameplay. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106707
  • Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.12.033
  • Sanabria-Z, J. C., Molina Espinosa, J. M., Alfaro Ponce, B., & Vycudilíková Outlá, M. (2022). A threshold for citizen science projects: Complex thinking as a driver of holistic development. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.2.33052
  • Schrier, K. (2018). Designing learning with citizen science and games. The Emerging Learning Design Journal, 4(1). https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/eldj/vol4/iss1/3
  • Schwab, K. (2016, January 14). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means and how to respond. World Economic Forum.
  • Serrano, K. (2019). The effect of digital game-based learning on student learning: A literature review. Graduate Research Papers. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/grp/943
  • Shelton, P. G., Corral, I., & Kyle, B. (2017). Advancements in undergraduate medical education: Meeting the challenges of an evolving world of education, healthcare, and technology. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 88(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9471-x
  • Shohel, M. M. C., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Naomee, I., Tanni, S. A., & Azim, F. (2022). Game-based teaching and learning in higher education. In Handbook of Research on Acquiring 21st Century Literacy Skills Through Game-Based Learning (pp. 78–106). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7271-9.ch005
  • Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
  • Song, H., Kim, J., Tenzek, K. E., & Lee, K. M. (2013). The effects of competition and competitiveness upon intrinsic motivation in exergames. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1702–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2013.01.042
  • Sousa, M. J., & Rocha, Á. (2019). Leadership styles and skills developed through game-based learning. Journal of Business Research, 94, 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.057
  • Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Teachers College Press.
  • Strobl, B., Etter, S., van Meerveld, I., & Seibert, J. (2019). The CrowdWater game: A playful way to improve the accuracy of crowdsourced water level class data. PLoS One, 14(9), e0222579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222579
  • Strobl, B., Etter, S., van Meerveld, H. J. I., & Seibert, J. (2020). Training citizen scientists through an online game developed for data quality control. Geoscience Communication, 3(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-3-109-2020
  • Sun, L., Guo, Z., & Hu, L. (2021). Educational games promote the development of students’ computational thinking: A meta-analytic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1931891
  • Tan, O.-S. (2003). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century (O. S. Tan Ed., 1st ed.). Gale Cengage Learning.
  • Theses, C., & Jagad, L. (2011). Online gaming and teamwork [ Communication Theses]. https://doi.org/10.57709/2351660
  • Tobias, S., Fletcher, J. D., & Wind, A. P. (2014). Game-Based Learning. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_38
  • Tokac, U., Novak, E., & Thompson, C. G. (2019). Effects of game‐based learning on students’ mathematics achievement: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12347
  • Tokarieva, A. V., Volkova, N. P., Harkusha, I. V., & Soloviev, V. N. (2019). Educational digital games: Models and implementation. Educational Dimension, 1, 5–26. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v53i1.3872
  • Troiano, G. M., Chen, Q., Alba, Á. V., Robles, G., Smith, G., Cassidy, M., Tucker-Raymond, E., Puttick, G., & Harteveld, C. (2020). Exploring how game genre in student-designed games influences computational thinking development. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376755
  • Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 144, 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2019.103698
  • Turchi, T., Fogli, D., & Malizia, A. (2019). Fostering computational thinking through collaborative game-based learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(10), 13649–13673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-7229-9
  • UNDP. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier: Human development and the Anthropocene. ( United Nations Development Programme, Ed.). United Nations Development Programme.
  • UNESCO. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. UNESCO, 11(10), 2528. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000123074.locale=es
  • UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on open science. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949.locale=en
  • Valverde Berrocoso, J., Del Carmen Garrido-Arroyo, M., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009–2018). Sustainability, 12(12), 5153. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12125153
  • Wang, C., Shen, J., & Chao, J. (2022). Integrating computational thinking in STEM education: A literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1949–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10227-5
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  • Wu, M. L., & Richards, K. (2011). Facilitating computational thinking through game design. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 6872 LNCS (pp. 220–227). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23456-9_39/COVER