Students’ perceptions in undergraduate online math courses

References

• Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Bures, E., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaber, A. (2018). E-learning policy in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and successes. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499918764147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshehri, A. (2018). The reality of EFL student teachers’ use of LMS (Blackboard) at King Khalid University. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(1), 380–402.
   Google Scholar
• Alshehri, S. (2019). The attitudes of undergraduate mathematics faculty in King Khalid University (KKU) toward using the online learning environment in teaching mathematics. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 8(6), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Williams, M. K. (2010). Professional Development 2.0: Transforming Teacher Education Pedagogy with 21st Century Tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784651
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Sadera, W. A., & McNary, S. W. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3), 128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, M. (2017). Understanding Faculty Perceptions in Undergraduate Online Math Courses. University of Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnel, W. (2008). Improving feedback to students in online courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(5), 290–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter, L., Salyers, V., Myers, S., Hipfner, C., Hoffart, C., MacLean, C., White, K., Matus, T., Forssman, V., & Barrett, P. (2014). Qualitative insights from a Canadian multi-institutional research study: In search of meaningful e-learning. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–17. Retrieved from, http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol5/iss1/10
   Google Scholar
• Croxton, R. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–324.
   Google Scholar
• Eskey, M. T., & Schulte, M. (2012). Comparing attitudes of online instructors and online college students: Quantitative results for training, evaluation and administration. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(4), Retrieved from. http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter154/eskey_schulte154.html
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J. M., & DeFelice, A. E. (2010). Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(2), 13–84. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i2.772
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, C., Sullivan, D. H., Weatherspoon, D., & Hussey, L. (2017). Faculty perceptions of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality. Nursing Research & Practice, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9374189
   Google Scholar
• Golubski, C., Navarrete, C., & Azua, E. (2013). Improving student outcomes in distance learning mathematics classes. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE, Oklahoma City, OK, USA (pp.1396–1398). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, D. Y. (2011). Who holds the pen? Strategies to student satisfaction scores in online learning environments. The Business Review, Cambridge, 18(2), 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nicole, L. M. S., & A A O P, O. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Journal of American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1441
   Google Scholar
• Plante, K., & Asselin, M. (2014). Best practices for creating social presence and caring behaviors online. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(4), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.5480/13-1094.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, J., Besser, E., Koehler, A., Lim, J., & Strait, M. (2016). Instructors’ perceptions of instructor presence in online learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancho, T., & Excudero, N. (2012). A proposal for formative assessment with automatic feedback on an online mathematics subject. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 9(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v9i2.1285
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty Years of Research on the Academic Performance Differences between Traditional and Distance Learning: Summative Meta-Analysis and Trend. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 318–334.
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: Summative meta-analysis and trend examination. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching (JOLT), 6(2), 318–334.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2020). Qualitative Research (Vol. 1). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tuncay, N., & Uzunboylu, H. (2010). Trend of “distance education” in the last three decades. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(1), 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Wahyuni, D. (2012). The research design maze: Understanding paradigms, cases, methods, and methodologies. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Willging, P., & Johnson, S. (2009). Factors that influence students’ decision to drop out of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v8i4.1814
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education in Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711413814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research designs and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zidan, T. (2015). Teaching social work in an online environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 25(3), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2014.1003733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar