Effects of peer-editing on L2 writing achievement among secondary school students in Ethiopia

References

• Alias, M. D. I., Raof, A. H. A., & Abdullah, T. (2021). Teaching CEFR-aligned writing to young learners: Practices and voices of teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 351–16. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.18
   Google Scholar
• Austria, M. A. B. (2017). Peer response as an effective writing strategy. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(2), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, C. (2020). Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820952222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Brusa, M., & Harutyunyan, L. (2019). Peer review: A tool to enhance the quality of academic written productions. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p30
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. W., & Batista, B. (2023). To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100218
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. (2022). The role of feedback literacy in written corrective feedback research: From feedback information to feedback ecology. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2082120. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, I. L. (2012). Concepts in composition theory and practice in the teaching of writing. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, M. S., Pytlikzillig, L. M., & Burning, R. H. (2009). Helping pre-service teachers learn to assess writing: Practice and feedback in a web-based environment. Assessing Writing, 14(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Deni, A. R., & Zainal, Z. I. (2011). Peer-editing practice in the writing classroom: Benefits and drawbacks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 2(1), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.2n.1p.92
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlam, R., Ellis, R., & Batstone, R. (2013). Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing: Two approaches compared. System, 41(2), 257–268.‏. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrah, M. (2012). The impact of peer feedback on improving the writing skills among Hebron University students. An-Najah University Journal for Research, 26(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247-026-001-008
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. (2011). Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903197883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. (2003). Response to students writing: Implications for second-language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Frank, B., Simper, N., & Kaupp, J. (2018). Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex problem solving and modelling outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1299692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 1(77), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insai, S., & Poonlarp, T. (2017). More heads are better than one: Peer editing in a translation classrooms of EFL learners. PASAA, 54(1), 82–104.
   Google Scholar
• Khairuddin, Z., Rahmat, N. H., Noor, M. M., & Khairuddin, Z. (2021). The use of rhetorical strategies in argumentative essays. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.14
   Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, J. A. H. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2017). A study on the roles of peer review in the process of PAL. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(1), 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, Z. (2017). Salience of student written feedback by peer-revision in EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n12p151
   Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. (2008). Reviewers stances and writer perceptions in EFL Peer review training. English for Specific Purposes, 27(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. (2016). Effect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2013). Feedback models for learning, teaching and performance. In J. M. Spector, D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 56–89). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Muhammad, A. M., Kamil, M. A., & Druckman, Z. A. (2021). Towards a CEFR framework for workplace communication: Students’ perceptions of the sub-skills, use and importance of Language Productive Skills (LPS). Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.02
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2017). The role of corrective feedback: Theoretical and pedagogical perspective. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in Second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 1–20). Cambridge University press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589789.001
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimehchisalem, V., Mukundan, J., Rafik-Galea, S., & Samad, A. A. (2021). Assessment of the Analytic Scale of Argumentative Writing (ASAW). Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.01
   Google Scholar
• Nugroho, S. A. (2021). Improving the writing skill of the students using Peer-editing. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(2), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.62.34
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. (2013). Moving feedback forward: Theory to practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrović, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3047–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9571-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, J., Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. J. R. (2008). The nature, reception and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Journal of Computer and Education, 51(4), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Razali, K. A., Rahman, Z. A., Ahmad, I. S., & Othman, J. (2021). Malaysian ESL teachers’ practice of written feedback on students’ writing. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.03
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sufi, M. K. A., & Ibrahim, E. H. E. (2021). Mapping IIUM students’ English language writing proficiency to CEFR. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 29(S3), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.S3.05
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In G. Cole (Ed.), Reading on the development of children (pp. 34–40). Scientific American Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wondim, B. M., Bishaw, K. S., Zeleke, Y. T., & Geng, Y. (2023). Effects of teachers’ written corrective feedback on the writing achievement of first-year Ethiopian University students. Education Research International, 2023, 7129978. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7129978
   Google Scholar
• Yüce, E., & Aksu, A. B. (2019). Peer editing as a way of developing ELT students’ writing skills: An action research. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(4), 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.668377
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2022). Online peer editing: Effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills. Heliyon, 8(7), e09822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q., & Carless, D. (2018). Dialogue within peer feedback processes:Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417
   Google Scholar