Effects of using adjunct model of content-based instruction on students’ technical report writing performance

References

• Aklilu, G. (2015). An Investigation of the present situation communicative needs in an ESL Context. Civil Engineering Students in Focus: English for Specific Purposes World. ISSN, 16(48), 1682–22. www.esp-world.info
   Google Scholar
• Alred, G. J., Brusaw, C. T., & Oliu, W. E. (2009). The Handbook of Technical Writing (9th ed.). St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. M., & Keel, M. C. (2002). Using reasoning and writing to teach writing skills to Students with learning disabilities and behavioral disorders. Journal of Direct Instruction, 2(1), 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Angelil, C. S. (1994). The adjunct model of content-based language learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 8(2), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, G. H., Gonzalez, V., & Schwartz, H. (2004). Content-Based ESL Writing Curriculum: A Language Socialization Model. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 2(1), 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The Evolving Architecture of Content-Based Instruction: The Content-Based Classroom (2nd ed.). University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, D., Snow, M., & Wesche, M. (2003). Content-based second language instruction. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budinski, K. G. (2001). Engineers’ Guide to Technical Writing. United States of America: ASM International.
   Google Scholar
• Carrio-Pastor, L. M. (2009). Content and language integrated learning: Cultural diversity. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching methodology (3rd ed). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-based instruction: A relevant Approach of Language Teaching.Annoul review of Applied linguistics. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Discourse in content and language integrated learning classroom. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dawit, A. (2014). Applying the process-genre approach to written business communication skills in English ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bahir Dar University.
   Google Scholar
• Dornei, Z. (2007). Research Method in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Method. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. O. (2017). Assessing the Effectiveness of Content-Based Language Instruction (CBLI. Japanese at the College Advanced Level: American Association of Teachers of Japanese, 51(2), 199–241.
   Google Scholar
• Duenas, M. (2004). The Whats, Whys, Hows and Whos of Content-Based Instruction in Second/Foreign Language Education. International Journal of English Studies, 4(l), 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanchian, E., & Karimi, M. Effects of Adjunct Model of Instruction on EAP Learners’ Reading Comprehension Skill. (2022). Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 8(2), 1–20. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Glasman Deal, H. (2010). Scientific Research Writing for Non-native Speaker of English. Imperial College.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2007). English for specific purpose: Some Influences and Impacts. The University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2013). Handbook of English for Specific Purposes. (2013). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2014). English for Academic Purposes. In C. Leung & B. Street (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to English Studies (pp. 16). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, L. F. (2000). The Impact of Content-Based Instructional Programs on the Academic Progress of ESL Students. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 309–320.
   Google Scholar
• Khonsari, S. (2005). Approaches to Content-Based Academic Writing. Journal of ASIA TEFL, 2(2), 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Kinsey, M. E. (2008). The adjunct model of language instruction: guide lines for implementation in the English for academic purpose program ( MA thesis). Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. (2018). Ethiopia Federal and Democratic republic Ministry of Education: Ethiopia Educational training Roadmap preparation Study. Addis Ababa.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, G. S. (1997). The Adjunct Model of Content-based Instruction: A Comparative Study in Higher Education in. Portland University.
   Google Scholar
• Phonlabutra, K. (2007). Learning content-based program in a junior-high school in Thailand: A case study. The University of Arizona. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194337
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, M. A. (2001). Content-based and immersion models for second and foreign language teaching. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign l language (3rd ed., pp. 303–318). Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Stryker, S., & Leaver, B. L. (Eds.). (1997). Content-Based Instruction in Foreign Language Education. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troncale. (2002). Content-Based Instruction, Cooperative Learning, and CALP Instruction: Addressing the Whole Education of 7-12 ESL Students. Columbia University. Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Valeo, A. (2013). the integration of language and Content: Form focused instruction in content-based language program.The. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics: Oxford University, 16(1), 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos, O. B. (2013). Content-Based Instruction: A Relevant Approach of Language Teaching. NOVACIONES EDUCATIVAS ·, 15(20), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar