Consequential effects of using competing perspectives to predict learning style in e-learning systems

References

• Abdullah, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abyaa, A., Khalidi Idrissi, M., & Bennani, S. (2019). Learner modeling: A systematic review of the literature from the last 5 years. Educational Technology Research & Development : ETR & D, 67(5), 1105–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, V., & Anouncia, S. M. (2018). Learning style detection based on cognitive skills to support adaptive learning environment–A reinforcement approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 9(4), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali, M. M. E. I., Aliyah, Z., & Humaidi, D. (2022). Effectiveness of hybrid learning assisted in e-learning media in mathematics learning at elementary school. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4), 683–690. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.340
   Google Scholar
• Bali, M. M. E. I., & Rozhana, K. M. (2022). Internalization of gen-q characters in elementary school through CALISA learning. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 25(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2022v25n1i7
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J., Chang, T. W., Popescu, E., & Graf, S. (2017). Learning style identifier: Improving the precision of learning style identification through computational intelligence algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 75, 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysafiadi, K., Troussas, C., Virvou, M., & Sakkopoulos, E. (2019). ICALM: An intelligent mechanism for the creation of dynamically adaptive learning material. Sensors & Transducers, 234(6), 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Churngchow, C., Rorbkorb, N., Petchurai, O.-T., & Tansakul, J. C. (2020). Appropriate learning management for students with different learning styles within a multicultural society at state-run universities in Thailand. Int. J. High. Educ, 9(2), 200–208.
   Google Scholar
• Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., DiFelice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz, F. S., Rubilar, T. P., Figueroa, C. C., & Silva, R. M. (2018). An Adaptive E-Learning Platform with VARK Learning Styles to Support the Learning of Object Orientation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE) (pp. 1–6).
   Google Scholar
• El-Sabagh, H. A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, R. M. (1996). Matters of style. ASEE Prism, 6(4), 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, J., Monteserin, A., & Amandi, A. (2014). Automatic detection of learning styles: State of the art. Artificial Intelligence Review, 44(2), 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-014-9422-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, L. D., Spadon, G., Carvalho, A. C., & Rodrigues, J. F. (2018). A comparative analysis of the automatic modeling of Learning Styles through Machine Learning techniques. 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. (2011). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. N.D. Fleming.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. D.; (1995), I’m different; not dumb modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. In A. Zelmer (Ed.), Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), HERDSA, 18, 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Gomede, E., De Barros, R. M., & Mendes, L. D. S. (2020). Use of deep multi-target prediction to identify learning styles. Applied Sciences, 10(5), 1756. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051756
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., & Kamber, M. (2001). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. Morgan Kauffmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hasibuan, M. S., Nugroho, L. E., & Santosa, P. I. (2019). Model detecting learning styles with artificial neural network. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.540
   Google Scholar
• Jagadeesan, S., & Subbiah, J. (2020). Real-time personalization and recommendation in adaptive learning management system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(11), 4731–4741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01729-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jen, L., & Lin, Y.-H. (2021). A brief overview of the accuracy of classification algorithms for data prediction in machine learning applications. Journal of Applied Data Sciences, 2(3), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.47738/jads.v2i3.38
   Google Scholar
• Kalhoro, A. A., Rajper, S., & Mallah, G. A. (2016). Detection of e-Learners’ learning styles: An automatic approach using decision tree. International Journal of Computer Science and System Analysis, 14(8), 420–425.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, M., Siklander, P., Randolph, J., & Ruokamo, H. (2017). Teachers’ engagement and students’ satisfaction with a playful learning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis, I., & Satratzemi, M. (2019). November. Finding an effective data mining algorithm for automatic detection of learning styles. In ECEL 2019 18th European Conference on e-Learning (p. 268). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S. H., Shamim, M. R. H., & Nambobi, M. (2018). Learning styles and online tools: How to construct an effective online learning environment. Optimizing student engagement in online learning environments, IGI Global, 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, R., Viscusi, R., Collier, A., Korndorffer, J., Shabahang, M. M., Fuhrman, G. M., & Korndorffer, J. R. (2018). Learning preferences of surgery residents: A multi-institutional study. Surgery, 163(4), 901–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolekar, S. V., Pai, R. M., & Manohara Pai, M. M. (2017). Prediction of learner’s profile based on learning styles in adaptive e-learning system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(6), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i06.6579
   Google Scholar
• Kolekar, S. V., Pai, R. M., & Manohara Pai, M. M. (2017). Prediction of Learner’s Profile Based on Learning Styles in Adaptive E-learning System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(6), 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwande, C., Muchemi, L., & Oboko, R. (2021). Identifying learning styles and cognitive traits in a learning management system. Heliyon, 7, e07701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlini, D., & Rossini, M. (2021). Text categorization with WEKA: A survey. Machine Learning with Applications, 4, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100033
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, M. A., & Khurshid, K. (2020). Impact of VARK learning model at tertiary level education. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 14(5), 354–361.
   Google Scholar
• Moodle. (2023). Moodle statistics. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://stats.moodle.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, T. K. (1996). The expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 13(6), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/79.543975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakra, A., & Duha, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of bayes net classifier, naive bayes classifier and combination of both classifiers using WEKA. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 3(3), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2019.03.04
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2020). 10 Usability heuristics for user interface design. Retrieved March 10, 2023, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/.
   Google Scholar
• Obeng, A. Y., Coleman, A., & Wang, S. (2020). Evaluating the effects and outcome of technological innovation on a web-based e-learning system. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1836729. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1836729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouatik, F., Erritali, M., Ouatik, F., & Jourhmane, M. (2022). Predicting student success using big data and machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 17(12), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.30259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantho, O. (2016). Using decision tree C4.5 algorithm to predict VARK learning styles. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 24(2), 58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Marín, D., Paredes-Velasco, M., & Pizarro, C. (2022). Multi-mode digital teaching and learning of human-computer interaction (HCI) using the VARK model during COVID-19. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 78–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj, N. S., & Renumol, V. G. (2022). A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00199-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, F., Doğan, E., Okur, M. R., & Şahin, Y. L. (2022). Emotional outcomes of e-learning adoption during compulsory online education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7827–7849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10930-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şanlı, T., Sıcakyüz, Ç., & Yüregir, O. H. (2020). Comparison of the accuracy of classification algorithms on three data-sets in data mining: Example of 20 classes. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 12(3), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v12i3.8
   Google Scholar
• Selvi, K. (2010). Motivating factors in online courses. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.110
   Google Scholar
• Stojanova, A., Stojkovikj, N., Kocaleva, M., Zlatanovska, B., & Martinovska-Bande, C. (2017). Application of VARK learning model on “Data structures and algorithm“. Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 613–620).
   Google Scholar
• Sweta, S., & Lal, K. (2017). Personalized adaptive learner model in e-learning system using FCM and fuzzy inference system. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(4), 1249–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0309-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A., Malik, S. I., Shakir, M., & Alfarsi, G. M. (2019). A systematic review of personalized learning: Comparison between E-learning and learning by coursework program in Oman. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 14(9), 93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tmimi, M., Benslimane, M., Berrada, M., & Ouazzani, K. (2019). Implemented and tested conception proposal of adaptation model for adaptive hypermedia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Ijet), 14(2), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.8230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2017). Factors determining e-learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W3C. (2018). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, W3C Recommendation 2018. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-WCAG21-20180605/#sotd.
   Google Scholar
• Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., & Liu, L. (2022). Exploring non-traditional learner motivations and characteristics in online learning: A learner profile study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100051
   Google Scholar