1,466
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Educational Psychology & Counselling

Being learners with mental resilience as outcomes of metacognitive strategies in an academic context

Article: 2219497 | Received 15 Jun 2022, Accepted 22 May 2023, Published online: 01 Jun 2023

References

  • Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1816–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023
  • Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
  • Anthonysamy, L., Ah-Choo, K., & Soon-Hin, H. (2020). Cognitive and metacognitive strategies in digital learning: What’s working and what’s not in the age of brilliant technology. Journal of Physics, 1529(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/5/052019
  • Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  • Browning, M. H. E. M., Larson, L. R., Sharaievska, I., Rigolon, A., McAnirlin, O., Mullenbach, L., Cloutier, S., Vu, T. M., Thomsen, J., Reigner, N., Metcalf, E. C., D'Antonio, A., Helbich, M., Bratman, G. N., & Alvarez, H. O. (2021). Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States. PLos One, 16(1), e0245327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245327
  • Capobianco, L., Faija, C., Husain, Z., Wells, A., & Nater-Mewes, R. (2020). Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review. PLos One, 15(9), e0238457. Article e0238457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238457
  • Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963
  • Cho, M. H., Kim, Y., & Choi, D. H. (2017). The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Davies, J. (2019). Self-regulated study skills among Malaysian students in transition to higher education. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, (July), 9523–9530. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2366
  • Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
  • Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive development inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
  • Gaskin, J., Godfrey, S., & Vance, A. (2018). Successful system-use: It’s Not just who you are, but what you do. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 10(2), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.17705/1thci.00104
  • Goda, Y., Yamada, M., Kato, H., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., & Miyagawa, H. (2015). Procrastination and other learning behavioral types in e-learning and their relationship with learning outcomes. Learning & Individual Differences, 37, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.001
  • Gómez- Molinero, R., Zayas, A., Ruíz-González, P., & Guil, R. (2018). Optimism and resilience among university students. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology Revista INFAD de Psicología, 1(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2018.n1.v1.1179
  • Goradia, T., & Bugarcic, A. (2017). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning within the online environment. Advances in Integrative Medicine, 4(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2017.05.001
  • Greene, J. A., Copeland, D. Z., Deekens, V. M., & Yu, S. B. (2018). Beyond knowledge: Examining digital literacy’s role in the acquisition of understanding in science. Computers & Education, 117, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.10.003
  • Greene, J. A., Yu, S. B., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond baron and kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
  • Kift, S. (2015). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA). HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2(1), 51–86. http://www.herdsa.org.au/system/files/HERDSARHE2015v02p51.pdf
  • Lauterman, T., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046
  • Lee, J., Moon, J., & Cho, B. (2015). The mediating role of self-regulation between digital literacy and learning outcomes in the digital textbook for middle school English. Educational Technology International, 16(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1021854
  • Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Hu, X. (2018). What are the effects of self-regulation phases and strategies for Chinese students? A meta-analysis of two decades research of the association between self-regulation and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Dec), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02434
  • Luo, G., McHenry, M. L., Letterio, J. J., & Paniagua, J. (2020). Estimating the prevalence and risk of COVID-19 among international travelers and evacuees of Wuhan through modeling and case reports. PLos One, 15(6), e0234955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234955
  • Malaysian Qualification Agency. (2020). Assessment of Students. Malaysian Qualifications Agency.
  • Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
  • Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?. Computers & Education, 59, 1065–1078.
  • Pagani, L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., & Stanca, L. (2016). The impact of digital skills on educational outcomes: Evidence from performance tests. Educational Studies, 42(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1148588
  • Perera, M. U., Gardner, L. A., & Peiris, A. (2016). Investigating the Interrelationship between Undergraduates’ Digital Literacy and Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–13). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7fef/23784110d0bfbc46cbd944064784e28fe517.pdf
  • Philipp, R., Kriston, L., Kühne, F., Härter, M., & Meister, R. (2020). Concepts of metacognition in the treatment of patients with mental disorders. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 38(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-019-00333-3
  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  • Prior, D. D., Mazanov, J., Meacheam, D., Heaslip, G., & Hanson, J. (2016). Attitude, digital literacy and self-efficacy: Flow‐ on effects for online learning behavior. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 91‐97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.01.001
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
  • Robbins, A., Kaye, E., & Catling, J. (2018). Predictors of student resilience in higher education. Psychology Teaching Review, 24(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2018.24.1.44
  • Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. In Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2
  • Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
  • Rutter, M. (2006). The promotion of resilience in the face of adversity. In A. Clarke-Stewart & J. Dunn (Eds.), Families count: Effects on child and adolescent development (pp. 26–52). Cambridge University Press.
  • Salari, N., Hosseinian-Far, A., Jalali, R., Vaisi-Raygani, A., Rasoulpoor, S., Mohammadi, M., Rasoulpoor, S., & Khaledi-Paveh, B. (2020). Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Globalization and Health, 16(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w
  • Scholastica, C. U., Nkiruka, E. I., & Ifeanyichukwu, E. I. (2016). Digital literacy skills possessed by students of UNN, implications for effective learning and performance: A study of the MTN Universities connect library. New Library World, 117(11), 702–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-08-2016-0061
  • Sheng, L. R. (2021). Mental Health Matters. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2021/01/31/mental-health-mattershealth-matters
  • Shopova, T. (2014). Digital literacy of students and its improvement at the university. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201
  • Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000
  • Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on college students’ mental health in the United States: Interview survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e21279. https://doi.org/10.2196/21279
  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful eLearning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  • Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? The Electronic Journal of E‐Learning, 14(1), 54–65. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1743
  • Tian, Y., Fang, Y., & Li, J. (2018). The effect of metacognitive knowledge on mathematics performance in self-regulated learning framework—Multiple mediation of self-efficacy and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. Article 2518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02518
  • Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. Higher Education Academy, 11, 1–15. Retrieved from. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/trowler/StudentEngagementLiteratureReview.pdf
  • Van Laer, S., & Elen, J. (2017). In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1395–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9505-x
  • Van Loon, W. O. (2001). Correlates of computer literacy among adult learners . Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304750979). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/304750979?accountid=28110
  • Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002
  • Wichadee, S. (2018). Significant predictors for effectiveness of blended learning in a language course. JALT CALL Journal, 14(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v14n1.222
  • Wu, H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
  • Yang, J. C., Quadir, B., Chen, N. S., & Miao, Q. (2016). Effects of online presence on learning performance in a blog-based online course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.002
  • Zhu, Y., Au, W., & Yates, G. (2016). University students’ self-control and self-regulated learning in a blended course. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.04.001
  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614
  • Zylka, J., Christoph, G., Kroehne, U., Hartig, J., & Goldhammer, F. (2015). Moving beyond cognitive elements of ICT literacy: First evidence on the structure of ICT engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.008