1,285
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Teacher Education & Development

Professional development on assessment for learning and its effect on pre-service teacher’s self-regulated learning

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2222875 | Received 25 Apr 2022, Accepted 03 Jun 2023, Published online: 10 Jun 2023

References

  • Alex, J., & Roberts, N. (2019). The need for relevant initial teacher education for primary mathematics: Evidence from the primary teacher education project in South Africa. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Durban, South Africa, 2019, 59–13. SAARMSTE. https://www.jet.org.za/clearinghouse/projects/primted/resources/mathematics-resources-repository/alex-and-roberts-2019.pdf
  • Allal, L. (2020). Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1609411.
  • Andrade, H., & Heritage, M. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623856
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
  • Chalachew, A. A. (2018). Factors and influences of self-regulation learning among sport science undergraduate students in Ethiopian universities. The International Journal Research Publication’s - Research Journal of Social Science and Management (RJSSM), 8(7), 72–82.
  • Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
  • Cousins-Cooper, K., Staley, K. N., Kim, S., & Luke, N. S. (2017). The effect of the math emporium instructional method on students’ performance in college algebra. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9493
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development (research brief). Effective Teacher Professional Development (Research Brief). June.
  • DeLuca, C., Coombs, A., & Sherman, A. (2018). Preparing teachers for assessment in schools: The influence of teacher educators. In In innovation and accountability in teacher education (pp. 171–186). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2_11.
  • Deluca, C., & Volante, L. (2016). Assessment for learning in teacher education programs: Navigating the juxtaposition of theory and praxis. JISTE, 20(1), 19–31.
  • DiFrancesca, D., Nietfeld, J. L., & Cao, L. (2016). A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010
  • Ferretti, F., Paraskevi, M. C., & Vannini, I. (2018). Formative assessment for mathematics teaching and learning teacher professional development research by video analysis methodologies. FrancoAngeli s.r.L, 3(February 2004). http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/25362
  • Fisseha, W. M., & Michael, D. J. (2016). The impact of formative assessment on self-regulating learning in university classrooms. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 4(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-4(1)-2016pp99-118
  • Goos, M. (2013). Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: A zone theory approach. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(4), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0477-z
  • Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten ten Brinke, D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Effects of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008
  • Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
  • Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor Michigan, 48109 (August 2016). https://ED338122.
  • Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9229-2
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2016). Implementing high quality assessment for learning: Mapping as a professional development tool for understanding the what to learn, why to learn it, and how to learn it. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_13.
  • Shepard, L. A., Penuel, W. R., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2018). Using learning and motivation theories to coherently link formative assessment, grading practices, and large-scale assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice, 37(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12189
  • Sintayehu, B., & Ashenafi, T. (2017). The impending challenges of continuous assessment implementation at dire Dawa university, Ethiopia. International Journal of African and Asian Studies, 35(1), 59–68.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. In Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.) (pp. 983). Harper and Row.
  • Teklebrhan, B., & Samuel, E. (2015). Problems and prospects of implementing continuous assessment at adigrat university. Journal of Education & Practice, 6(4), 19–26. http://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP
  • Wang, L. (2016). Sociocultural learning theories and information literacy teaching activities in higher education. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 47(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.47n2.149
  • Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Sonia, U. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero, Eds. The Second Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education: The Journey Continues. (pp. 73–108). SENSE PUBLISHERS: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_3.
  • Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating Assessment with Learning: What Will It Take to Make It Work?. In The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning (pp. 53–82). Routledge. 9781315086545. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315086545
  • Yiheyis, S. B., & Getachew, S. W. (2014). The implementation of continuous assessment in writing classes the of Jimma college of teachers education. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 10(1), 109–135. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesc/article/view/120611
  • Zepeda, S. J. (2013). Professional development : What works. (2nd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315854878
  • Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Zhang, J., Hunt, T. L., Emerling, C. R., Yang, S., & Xu, F. (2021). Teacher perceptions of effective professional development: Insights for design. Professional Development in Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879236
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). Adademic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2015). Self-regulated learning: theories, measures, and outcomes. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed. pp, 541–546). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26060-1