746
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
STUDENT LEARNING, CHILDHOOD & VOICES

Reexamining the online environment for self-directed learning

ORCID Icon
Article: 2255080 | Received 01 Nov 2020, Accepted 30 Aug 2023, Published online: 05 Sep 2023

References

  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., van den Berghe, L., de Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2014). Fostering a need-supportive teaching style: Intervention effects on physical education teachers’ beliefs and teaching behaviors. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(6), 595–20. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0229
  • Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., & Fernández-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 18(3), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2996
  • Andrade, M. S., & Bunker, E. L. (2009). A model for self-regulated distance language learning. Distance Education, 30(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845956
  • Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. Eds. (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751108
  • Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20277
  • Buck, S. (2016). In their own voices: Study habits of distance education students. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3–4), 137–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290x.2016.1206781
  • Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39–A41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ601725
  • Chen, J., Wang, M., Kirschner, P. A., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
  • Chou, P.-N. (2012). The relationship between Engineering students self-directed learning abilities and online learning Performances: A Pilot study. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 5(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v5i1.6784
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  • COLLINS, K., GROFF, S., MATHENA, C., & KUPCZYNSKI, L. (2019). Asynchronous video and the Development of instructor Social presence and student engagement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.522378
  • Danver, S. Eds. (2016). The SAGE encyclopedia of online education. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332
  • Deimann, M., & Bastiaens, T. (2010). The role of volition in distance education: An exploration of its capacities. The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.778
  • Denis, B. (2003). A conceptual framework to design and support self-directed learning in a blended learning programme. A case study: The DES-TEF. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000165626
  • Deniz, M. E. (2006). The relationship among coping with stress, life satisfaction, decision-making styles, and decision self-esteem: An investigation with Turkish university students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 34(9), 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.9.1161
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (Fifth ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Dixson, M. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13 http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890707.pdf.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics : quantitative,qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA82715592
  • Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
  • Durnali, M. (2020). The effect of self-directed learning on the relationship between self-Leadership and online learning among university students in Turkey. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 8(1), 129–165. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-8(1)-2020pp129-165
  • Dutton, J., & Perry, J. (2002). How do online students different from lecture students? Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1869
  • Dwivedi, A., Dwivedi, P., Bobek, S., & Sternad Zabukovšek, S. (2019). Factors affecting students’ engagement with online content in blended learning. Kybernetes, 48(7), 1500–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-10-2018-0559
  • Fazza, H., & Mahgoub, M. (2021). Student engagement in online and blended learning in a higher education institution in the Middle East: Challenges and solutions. In Studies in technology enhanced learning. Published. https://doi.org/10.21428/8c225f6e.5bcbd385
  • Geng, S., Law, K. M. Y., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0
  • George, M. (2008). Understanding Social research: Perspectives on methodology and Practice. Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-14.2.1886
  • Glenn, C. (2016). Adding the human touch to asynchronous online learning. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116634104
  • Howell, A. J., & Watson, D. C. (2007). Procrastination: Associations with achievement goal orientation and learning strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.017
  • Hromalik, C. D., & Koszalka, T. A. (2018). Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes. Distance Education, 39(4), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520044
  • Ingulfsen, L., Furberg, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2018). Students’ engagement with real-time graphs in CSCL settings: Scrutinizing the role of teacher support. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9290-1
  • Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
  • Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher Education. A Literature Review Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713
  • Kim, R., Olfman, L., Ryan, T., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). Leveraging a personalized system to improve self-directed learning in online educational environments. Computers & Education, 70(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.006
  • Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2016). Recommending self-regulated learning strategies does not improve performance in a MOOC. Proceedings of the third (2016) ACM conference on learning (pp. 101–104).
  • Klingsieck, K. B., Fries, S., Horz, C., & Hofer, M. (2012). Procrastination in a distance university setting. Distance Education, 33(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723165
  • Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
  • Lup, O., & Mitrea, E. C. (2021). ONLINE LEARNING DURING the PANDEMIC: ASSESSING DISPARITIES in STUDENT ENGAGEMENT in HIGHER EDUCATION. Journal of Pedagogy - Revista de Pedagogie, LXIX(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.26755/revped/2021.1/31
  • Melissa, K. (2015). Lost in translation: Adapting a face-to-face course into an online learning experience. Health Promotion Practice, 16(5), 625–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915588295
  • Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 2001(89), 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.3
  • Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012
  • Nawrot, I., & Doucet, A. (2014). Building engagement for MOOC students: Introducing support for time management on online learning platforms. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1077–1082). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2580054
  • Rabin, L. A., Fogel, J., & Nutter-Upham, K. E. (2011). Academic procrastination in college students: The role of self-reported executive functioning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.518597
  • Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Blackwell.
  • Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). Moocs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2033
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Cognitive engagement in the problem-based learning classroom. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 16(4), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9272-9
  • Song, L., & Hill, J. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42. http://acmd615.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/1329033/Song.pdf
  • Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2019). Older, online and first: Recommendations for retention and success. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3913
  • Sumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3142
  • van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00358-6
  • Wolters, C. A. (2003). Understanding procrastination from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.179
  • Xie, K., Heddy, B. C., & Greene, B. A. (2019). Affordances of using mobile technology to support experience-sampling method in examining college students’ engagement. Computers & Education, 128, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.020
  • Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 1882–1895). Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675217
  • Zhu, M. (2021). Enhancing MOOC learners’ skills for self-directed learning. Distance Education, 42(3), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1956302
  • Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2019a). Designing MOOCs to facilitate participant self-directed learning: An analysis of instructor perspectives and practices. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 16(2), 39–60. https://bit.ly/3yBPHI8
  • Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2019b). Designing MOOCs to facilitate participant self-monitoring for self-directed learning. Online Learning, 23(4), 106–134. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2037
  • Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). Technology tools and instructional strategies for designing and delivering MOOCs to facilitate self-monitoring of learners. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i1.380
  • Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). Self-directed learning in MOOCs: Exploring the relationships among motivation, self-monitoring, and self-management. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(5), 2073–2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09747-8