Undergraduate students’ preference between online test and paper-based test in Sub-Saharan Africa

References

• Al-Qdah, M., & Ababneh, I. (2017). Comparing online and paper exams: Performances and perceptions of Saudi students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(2), 106–13. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.2.850
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. E., Persky, H., Weiss, A. R. & & Jenkins, F. (2007). Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments A Report From the NAEP Technology-Based Assessment Project, Research and Development Series. NCES 2007–466. National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007466
   Google Scholar
• Boevé, A. J., Meijer, R. R., Albers, C. J., Beetsma, Y., Bosker, R. J., & De Smedt, B. (2015). Introducing computer-based testing in high-stakes exams in higher education: Results of a field experiment. PLoS One, 10(12), e0143616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulent, B., Murat, Y., & Selahattin, G. (2016). Attitude scale towards web-based examination system (MOODLE) - validity and reliability study. Educational Research & Reviews, 11(17), 1641–1649. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2850
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. S. (2015). Students’ performance and preference on computer-based tests vs. paper-based tests: a case study. Master’s thesis, submitted to the Department of Language, Learning, and Leadership, State University of New York at Fredonia, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12648/309
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Figaredo, D., Gil-Jaurena, I., & Morentin-Encina, J. (2022). The impact of rapid adoption of online assessment on students’ performance and perceptions: Evidence from a distance learning university. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(3), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekmatshoar-Tabari, B., & Rahimy, R. (2021). Tailored vs. Standard curriculum and general English achievement: A study of teachers’ views. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 14(1), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2021.14.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Jaap, A., Dewar, A., Duncan, C., Fairhurst, K., Hope, D., & Kluth, D. (2021). Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02521-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jugessur, Y. S. M. F. (2022). Reliability and internal consistency of data: Significance of calculating cronbach’s alpha coefficient in educational research. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), 11(4), 09–14. https://doi.org/10.35629/7722-1104030914
   Google Scholar
• Karaoğlan-Yilmaz, F. G., Üstün, A. B., & Yilmaz, R. (2020). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ opinions on advantages and disadvantages of online formative assessment: An example of online multiple-choice exam. Journal of Teacher Education & Lifelong Learning (TELL), 2(1), 10–19. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED605727.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khairuddin, Z., Supie, H. S. M., Zahari, N. S., & Arif, N. N. A. N. M. (2022). Students’ perceptions on the implementation and challenges of computer-based language test for diploma course assessment. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 12(9), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.55493/5007.v12i9.4572
   Google Scholar
• Khoshsima, H., & Hashemi Toroujeni, S. M. (2017). Computer-based testing: Score equivalence and testing administration mode preference in a comparative evaluation study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(10), 35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i10.6875
   Google Scholar
• Khoshsima, H., Hashemi Toroujeni, S. M., Thompson, N., & Ebrahimi, M. R. (2019). Computer-based (CBT) vs. paper-based (PBT) testing: Mode effect, relationship between computer familiarity, attitudes, aversion and mode preference with CBT test scores in an asian private efl context. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 86–101. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1204641.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research (9th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marín García, P.-J., Arnau-Bonachera, A., & Llobat, L. (2021). Preferences and scores of different types of exams during COVID-19 pandemic in faculty of veterinary medicine in Spain: A cross-sectional study of paper and e-exams. Education in Science: The Bulletin of the Association for Science Education, 11(8), 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080386
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, T., & Cuevas, J. (2020). A comparison of computer based testing and paper and pencil testing in mathematics assessment. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 10(2), 78–89. https://www.tojned.net/journals/tojned/articles/v10i02/v10i02-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. Face-to-face environmental Science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio, J., Glasnapp, D. R., Yang, X. & & Poggio, A. J. (2005). A comparative evaluation of score results from computerized and paper & pencil mathematics testing in a large scale state assessment program. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(6). https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/jtla/article/download/1659/1497/0
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E. (2013). Implementation and student perception of e-assessment in a chemical engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.760533
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeboah, D., & Nyagorme, P. (2022). Students’ acceptance of WhatsApp as teaching and learning tool in distance higher education in sub-Saharan Africa. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2077045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeboah, D., Nyagorme, P., & Barfi, K. (2020). Mobile learning support in delivering distance education: Perception of students of university of Cape Coast, Ghana. Texila International Journal of Academic Research, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.07.02.Art007
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, F. N. (2021). Comparing paper-pencil and computer-based tests: A meta-analysis study in the sample of turkey. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 93, 279–300. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.93.13
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT) and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00147-0
   Google Scholar