Content analysis of Biology textbooks across selected educational boards of Asia for misconceptions and elements of conceptual change towards learning ‘Cell Structure’

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariasi, N., & Mason, L. (2011). Uncovering the effect of text structure in learning from a science text: An eye-tracking study. Instructional Science, 39(5), 581–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9142-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aşçı, Z., Özkan, Ş., & Tekkaya, C. (2001). Students’ misconceptions about respiration. Egitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 26(120), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S., & Resnick, M. S. (2020). Refutation texts and argumentation for conceptual change: A winning or a redundant combination? Learning and Instruction, 65, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(3), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/747763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier, M. J. (1996). Establishing the psychometric properties of a scale for evaluating quality in printed education materials. Patient Education and Counseling, 29(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0738-3991(96)00927-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binns, I. C., & Bell, R. L. (2015). Representation of scientific methodology in secondary science textbooks. Science & Education, 24(7–8), 913–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9765-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt. (2005). Examining the “script” in Science education: Critical literacy in the classroom. In A. J. Rodriguez and R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms (pp. 243–261). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1989). Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding. Educational Psychologist, 24(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2403_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhri, V. K., Elenius, D., Goldenkranz, A., Gong, A., Martone, M. E., Webb, W., & Yorke-Smith, N. (2014). Comparative analysis of knowledge representation and reasoning requirements across a range of life sciences textbooks. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, M., & Wong, S. (1995). Ninth graders’ mental models and processes of generating inferences of four seasons. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 3, 23–68. http://www1.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/en/cjse/0301/0301023.ht
   Google Scholar
• The Condition of Education. (2004). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004077.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakidoy, I. N., Kendeou, P., & Ioannides, C. (2003). Reading about energy: The effects of text structure in science learning and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-476x(02)00039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J., & Smith, E. (1989). Prior knowledge and learning from science text: An instructional study. In <. I. I. A. I. M. In & <. I. I. A. I. <. Zutell (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction (pp. 345–352). NRC.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1988). The cell concept of 10th graders: Curricular expectations and reality. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, A., & Jungwirth, E. (1989). The pupil and the living cell: A taxonomy of dysfunctional ideas about an abstract idea. Journal of Biological Education, 23(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1989.9655024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving Science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, E., & Owen, D. (2013). Student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education. Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, M. D., & Jiménez Tejada, M. P. (2018). Difficulties learning about the cell. Expectations Vs Reality Journal of Biological Education, 53(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1469542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, F., Tovar, M. E., & Gallegos, L. (2003). Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, M. S. (2005). The “warming trend” in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 40(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Barros, S., Martínez-Losada, C., Vega, P., & Mondelo, M. (2005). The ideas of Spanish primary teachers on how to develop an understanding of processes in science and their support in textbooks. Research in Science Education - Past, Present, and Future, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47639-8_20
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Science education, conceptual change and breaking with everyday experience. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00367685
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, N. K., Khoo, L. E., & Chia, L. S. (1993). Some misconceptions in chemistry: A cross cultural comparison and implications for teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(3), 65–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40188778
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A Dual-process Model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023477131081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynd, C., & Alvermann, D. (1986). Prior knowledge activation in refutation and non-refutation text. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 01(1), 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Izsák, A., & Sherin, M. G. (2003). Exploring the use of new representations as a resource for teacher learning. School Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18110.x
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, A. M. P. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, E. B. (1993). Textbooks in the kaleidoscope. A critical survey of literature and research on educational texts. Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahveci, A. (2009). Quantitative analysis of Science and chemistry textbooks for indicators of reform: A complementary perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1495–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903127649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahveci, A., & Selahatdin, A. Y. (2008). Different approaches – common implications: Brain-based and constructivist learning from a paradigms and integral Model perspective. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 01(1), 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & Van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khine, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2016). Content analysis of the diagrammatic representations of primary science textbooks. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1288a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education : The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Utrecht University Repository [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
   Google Scholar
• Kragten, M., Admiraal, W., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2012). Diagrammatic literacy in secondary science education. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1785–1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9331-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmer, M., Edwards, J., & Rapule, S. (2008). Educators’ selection and evaluation of natural sciences textbooks. South African Journal of Education, 28(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v28n2a169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Chromosomes: The missing link — young people’s understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Y., & Cobern, W. W. (2013). Analysis of a typical Chinese high school biology textbook using the AAAS textbook standards. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.942a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2013). Content analysis of diagrams in secondary school science textbooks. Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_14
   Google Scholar
• Lubben, F., Netshisuaulu, T., & Campell, B. (1999). Students’ use of cultural metaphors and their scientific understandings related to heating. Science Education, 83(6), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<761:AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, C., & Alant, B. (2004). Finding direction when the ground is moving: Science education research in South Africa. Studies in Science Education, 40(1), 49–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260408560203
   Google Scholar
• Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maria, K. (2000). Conceptual change instruction: A social constructivist perspective. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735600278042
   Google Scholar
• Maria, K., & MacGinitie, W. (1987). Learning from texts that refute the reader’s prior knowledge. Reading Research and Instruction, 26(4), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388078709557912
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
   Google Scholar
• Mikk, J. (2000). Textbook: Research and writing. Peter Lang Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2002). Science learning through text: The effect of text design and text comprehension skills on conceptual change. Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice, 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47637-1_17
   Google Scholar
• Mikkilä, M., & Olkinuora, E. (1994). Problems of current textbooks and workbooks: Do they promote highquality learning? In J. De & H.-W. van (Eds.), Process-oriented instruction and learning from text (pp (pp. 151–164). VU University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaz, M., & Maza, A. (2011). Nature of science in general chemistry textbooks. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsche, C. G. (1992). A teacher and his students examine textbooks. In J. G. Herlihy (Ed.), The textbook controversy (pp. 113–120). Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in Science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science new series from. 328(5977), 463–466. Retrieved June 18, 2021 http://www.jstor.org/stable/40655777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, Ö. (2000). The levels of students’ understanding of basic concepts in reproduction and inheritance in the living things unit at 8th grade. Unpublished Master Thesis, the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, .
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2007). An overview of conceptual ChangeTheories. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75414
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2003). Investigating the relationship between refutational text and conceptual change. Science Education, 87(5), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinarbaşi, T., Canpolat, N., Bayrakçeken, S., & Geban, Ö. (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students’ understanding of solution concepts. Research in Science Education, 36(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9003-4
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U. D., & Chanetsa, T. (2016). An analysis of South African grade 9 natural sciences textbooks for their representation of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1167985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, U., & Padayachee, K. (2015). A comparative analysis of South African life sciences and biology textbooks for inclusion of the nature of science. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemeier, T., Gropengießer, & Gropengießer, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. Teaching Experiments International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701294716
   Google Scholar
• Robitaille, D. F., & Travers, K. J. (1992). International studies of achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of mathematics (pp. 687–709). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A method for analyzing the coherence of high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. pp. 139-175) (pp. 139–175). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, G. (1979). Concept formation in biology: The concept ‘growth’. European Journal of Science Education, 1(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010110
   Google Scholar
• Shiland, T. W. (1997). Quantum mechanics and conceptual change in high school chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<535:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Broughton, S. H., Diakidoy, I. A. N., Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2011). Bridging reading comprehension and conceptual change in science education: The promise of refutation text. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, R. D. (1991). Textbook errors & misconceptions in biology: Cell metabolism. The American Biology Teacher, 53(6), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/4449321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel, S. (2010). The assessment of the quality of science education textbooks : Conceptual framework and instruments for analysis. University of South Africa. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/4041
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (2008, April 15). It’s OBE, but not as it should be Mail & Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating high school students’ misconceptions concerning diffusion and osmosis through concept mapping and conceptual change text. Research in Science and Technological Education, 21(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308340
   Google Scholar
• Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeff, R. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008). Systems modelling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701237780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesterinen, V., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2011). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in Nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojíř, K., & Rusek, M. (2019). Science education textbook research trends: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1496–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Mason, L. (2012). Conceptual change induced by instruction: A complex interplay of multiple factors. APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol 2: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-009
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (1997, July). The pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges of creating a constructivist classroom [paper presentation]. International Congress on Personal Construct Psychology (12th, July 9-11, 1997).
   Google Scholar
• Zamora, S. E., & Guerra, M. I. (1993). Misconceptions about cells [paper presentation]. 3rd International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Cornell University,
   Google Scholar