On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study

References

• Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224490309552164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aretz, W., Demuth, I., Schmidt, K., & Vierlein, J. (2010). Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of online-dating- service-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Blackhart, G. C., Fitzpatrick, J., & Williamson, J. (2014). Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 113–118. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1993). Measures of self-esteem. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (3rd ed., pp. 115–160). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bruch, M. A., Gorsky, J. M., Collins, T. M., & Berger, P. A. (1989). Shyness and sociability reexamined: A multicomponent analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 904–915.10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brym, R. J., & Lenton, R. L. (2003). Love at first byte: Internet dating in Canada (Unpublished Manuscript). Ontario: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Cheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 330–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.2.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisler, J. C., & McCreary, D. R. (2010). Handbook of gender research in psychology, Vol 1: Gender research in general and experimental psychology. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Doan, T. T. (2010). Online dating: Determining the presence of a stigma. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3426707).
   Google Scholar
• Donn, J. E., & Sherman, R. C. (2002). Attitudes and practices regarding the formation of romantic relationships on the internet. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 5, 107–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2014, January). Social media update 2013. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-Media-Update.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2012). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society. Retrieved from http://nms.sagepub.com/content/14/1/45.short
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66.10.1177/1529100612436522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, J. H., Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2008). People are experience goods: Improving online dating with virtual dates. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 51–61.10.1002/dir.20107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlobalWebIndex Q1. (2015). Base: Tinder users aged 16-64. Retrieved from http://www.globalwebindex.net/blog/what-to-know-about-Tinder™-in-5-charts
   Google Scholar
• Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.10.1080/00224490609552324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., Okdie, B. M., & Kruse, S. A. (2012). Dating deception: Gender, online dating, and exaggerated self-presentation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 642–647.10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 117–135.10.1177/0265407509349633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, C., Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The brief sexual attitudes scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 76–86. doi:10.1080/00224490609552301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitsch, G. J., Hortaçsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100, 130–163.10.1257/aer.100.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., & Schneider, M. E. (2013). Casual hook up sex during the first year of college: Prospective associations with attitudes about sex and love relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1451–1462. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0078-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Kwon, K., & Lee, M. (2009). Psychological characteristics of Internet dating service users: The effect of self-esteem, involvement, and sociability on the use of Internet dating services. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12, 445–449. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031.10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49–74.10.1111/1540-4560.00248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapowsky, I. (2015, August 12). The harmful myth that Tinder’s just for hookups. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2015/08/an-admittedly-biased-defense-of-Tinder/
   Google Scholar
• Le Gall, A., Mullet, E., & Shafighi, S. (2002). Age, religious beliefs, and sexual attitudes. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 207–216.10.1080/00224490209552143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34, 384–407.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Prah, P., Erens, B., Sonnenberg, P., Clifton, S., … Johnson, A. M. (2013). Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: Findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). The Lancet, 382, 1781–1794.10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62035-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, E. J. (2001). Internet use and its relationship to loneliness. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 393–401.10.1089/109493101300210303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormonde, A. R. (2013). One click away: A study of stigma, attachment and personality traits in online dating compared to face-to-face dating in heterosexual individuals. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3601315).
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341.10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Who looks for casual dates on the internet? A test of the compensation and the recreation hypotheses. New Media & Society, 9, 455–474. doi:10.1177/1461444807076975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, C. (2015, November 4). Tinder tips from sean rad, Tinder’s CEO. Retrieved from Web Summit Blog: https://blog.websummit.net/tinder-tips-from-sean-rad-tinders-ceo/
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.10.1037/a0017504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, R. (2011). Shyness and sociability re-examined: Psychometrics, interactions, and correlates (Unpublished Masters Dissertation). Hamilton: McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 3–37.10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Sales, N. J. (2015, August 31). Tinder and the dawn of the “Dating Apocalypse”. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/Tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating
   Google Scholar
• Singleboersen-vergleich. (2014). On the online dating market in Austria. Retrieved from http://www.singleboersen-vergleich.at/presse/online-dating-marktstudie-oesterreich-2013-2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, 35, 259–288.10.1111/deci.2004.35.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek,L. M., & Loving, T. J. (2009). Contemporary methods of social introduction: Is the stigmatisation justified? Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 3, 87–104.10.5964/ijpr.v3isupp2.77
   Google Scholar
• Stein, S. (2013). A new perspective on relationship marketing through tinder. Retrieved from http://blog.360i.com/social-marketing/a-new-perspective-on-relationship-marketing-through-Tinder
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Reading between the lines: Linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2010) (pp. 5–8). doi:10.1145/1718918.1718921. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/connect/CSCW_10/docs/p5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78–97.10.1111/jcom.2012.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2002). Is the internet changing social life? It seems the more things change, the more they stay the same. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 849–852.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitty, M. T. (2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707–1723.10.1016/j.chb.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2009). Looking for love in so many places: Characteristics of online daters and speed daters. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 3, 63–86.10.5964/ijpr.v3isupp2.76
   Google Scholar