Assessment in people with PIMD: Pilot study into the usability and content validity of the Inventory of the personal Profile and Support

References

• Bayley, N. (1967). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bohmer, C. J. M., Niezen-de Boer, M. C., Klinkenberg-Knol, E. C., Deville, W. L. J. M., Nadorp, J. H. S. M., & Meuwissen, S. G. M. (1999). The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in institutionalized intellectually disabled individuals. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 94, 804–810.10.1111/ajg.1999.94.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntinx, W. H., & Schalock, R. I. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 283–294.10.1111/jppi.2010.7.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnaby, S. (2007). Developing good practice in the clinical assessment of people with profound intellectual disabilities and multiple impairment. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 88–96.10.1111/ppi.2007.4.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Forster, S., & Iacono, T. (2014). The nature of affect attunement used by disability support workers interacting with adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 58, 1105–1120. doi:10.111/jjr.12103
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, J. (1992). The administration of psychotropic and anticonvulsant drugs to children with profound intellectual disability and multiple impairments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 36, 473–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, J., & Langa, A. (2005). Introduction: Assessment in perspective. In J. Hogg & A. Langa (Eds.), Assessing adults with intellectual disabilities: A service providers’ guide (pp. 1–5). Oxford: The British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.10.1002/9780470773697
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S. L. G., Van der Putten, A. A. J., & Vlaskamp, C. (2013). What parents find important in the support of a child with profound intellectual and multipledisabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., De Bortoli, T., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2016). Triangulated proxy reporting: A technique for improving how communication partners come to know people with severe cognitive impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–7. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1211759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. S., Walla, P., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2013). Towards improved ways of knowing children with profound multiple disabilities: Introducing startle reflex modulation. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 16, 340–344.10.3109/17518423.2012.737039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, B., Lambrechts, G., Hostyn, I., & Petry, K. (2007). Quality-enhancing interventions for people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A review of the empirical research literature. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32, 163–178.10.1080/13668250701549427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2004). Person-centred planning or person-centred action? A response to the commentaries. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 31–35.10.1111/jar.2004.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakken, H., & Vlaskamp, C. (2007). A need for a taxonomy for profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 83–87. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00104.x
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on research methods: Whatever happened toqualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334–340.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, V. D., & Balla, A. D. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd edition American Guidance Service. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tadema, A. C., Vlaskamp, C., & Ruijssenaars, W. (2007). The validity of support profiles for children with profound multiple learning difficulties. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22, 147–160.10.1080/08856250701269440
   Google Scholar
• Van Timmeren, E. A., Van Schans, C. P., Van der Putten, A. A. J., Krijnen, W. P., Steenbergen, H. A., Schrojenstein-Lantman de Valk, H. M. J., & Waninge, A. (2016). Physical health issues in adults with severe or profound intellectual and motor disabilities: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 1, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, L., Oldenburger, M. N. C., & Van der Meulen, B. F. (2014). Developmental assessment in cases of PIMD: The opinion of support staff and psychologists about the suitability of the GTI and Bayley-III. [ Poster Presentation]. Retrieved September 4, 2015, from https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/en/publications/developmental-assessmentin-cases-of-pimd%2825c0e75a-61 cc-4f38-8249-dfda938fa177%29.html
   Google Scholar
• Visser, L., Ruiter, S. A., van der Meulen, B. F., Ruijssenaars, W. A., & Timmerman, M. E. (2014). Accommodating the Bayley-III for motor and/or visual impairment: A comparative pilot study. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 26, 57–67.10.1097/PEP.0000000000000004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C. (2005). Interdisciplinary assessment of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. In J. Hogg & A. Langa (Eds.), Assessing adults with intellectual disabilities: A service providers’ guide (pp. 39–51). Oxford: The British Psychological Society and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.10.1002/9780470773697
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Hiemstra, S. J., & Wiersma, L. A. (2007). Becoming aware of what you know or need to know: Gathering client and context characteristics in day services for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 97–103.10.1111/ppi.2007.4.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Poppes, P., & Van der Putten, A. A. J. (2015). Databank interventies langdurende zorg: beschrijving opvoedings/ondersteuningsprogramma voor mensen met (zeer) ernstige verstandelijke en meervoudige beperkingen. Utrecht: Vilans.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Poppes, P., & Zijlstra, R. (2005). Een programma van jezelf: Een opvoedingsprogramma voor kinderen met zeer ernstige verstandelijke en meervoudige beperkingen. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Van der Meulen, B. F., & Smrkovsky, M. (1999). Het Gedragstaxatie instrument. Groningen: Stichting Kinderstudies.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Van der Meulen, B. F., & Zijlstra, H. P. (2002). De instrumentele realisering van het Gedragstaxatie-instrument. Tijdschrift voor Orthopedagogiek, 41, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., & van der Putten, A. A. J. (2009). Focus on interaction: The use of an individualized support program for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 873–883.10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., & Van Wijck, R. (1997). Inventarisatie Persoonsbeeld en zorg (IPZ), versie voor residentiële instellingen. Groningen: Stichting Kinderstudies.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaskamp, C., Van Wijck, R., & Poppes, P. (2015). Inventarisatie Persoonsbeeld en Zorg: Versie voor kinderdagcentra. Groningen: Stichting Kinderstudies.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, J. M., Griffiths, C., & Gedling, A. (2000). The prevalence of ocular defects and the provision of eye care in adults with learning disabilities living in the community. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 20, 79–89.10.1016/S0275-5408(99)00048-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, Disability and health. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar