A test of gender–crime congruency on mock juror decision-making

References

• Baber, K. M., & Tucker, C. J. (2006). The social roles questionnaire: A new approach to measuring attitudes toward gender. Sex Roles, 54, 459–467. doi:10.1007/s11111-006-9018-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D., Rector, N. A., & Kalemba, V. (1994). Racial prejudice in the Canadian legal system: Juror decisions in a simulated rape trial. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 339–350. doi:10.1007/BF01499592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D. L., & Williams, J. E. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes. A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). Psychological experiments on the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulation: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, T., & Smith, J. L. (1999). Using the Internet for psychological research: Personality testing on the World-Wide Web. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 125–144. doi:10.1348/000712699161189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D. M., Ames, M. A., Etherington, R., & Pietsch, J. (1990). Effects of victim’s and defendant’s physical attractiveness on the perception of responsibility in an ambiguous domestic violence case. Journal of Family Violence, 5(3), 199–207.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, E. P. (1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1137. doi:10.1177/088626099014011002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 109–134. doi:10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia, R. R., & Chiang, K. P. (2003). Shoppers in cyberspace: Are they from venus or mars and does it matter? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(13), 171–176.10.1207/S15327663JCP13-1&2_15
   Google Scholar
• Duke, L. M., & Desforges, D. M. (2007). Mock juror decision-making in sexual abuse cases. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 3(2), 96–116.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnworth, M., & Teske, R. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women and Criminal Justice, 6(2), 23–44. doi:10.1300/J012v06n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Foley, L. A. (1993). A psychological view of the legal system. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
   Google Scholar
• ForsterLee, R., ForsterLee, L., Horowitz, I. A., & King, E. (2006). The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 24, 179–198. doi:10.1002/bsl.675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P. R. (2002). Disourses of female violence and societal gender stereotypes. Violence Against Women, 8, 1271–1300. doi:10.1177/107780102762478019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. A. (1990). Attributions for blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effects of subjects and defendant race on simulated juror decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(12), 971–983. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. A., Bindrim, T., McNicholas, M., & Walden, T. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated jurors. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191–197. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9711362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, K., & Feder, L. (2005). Criminal prosecution of domestic violence offences: An investigation of factors predictive of court outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 612–642. doi:10.1177/0093854805279945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19(6), 545. doi:10.1007/BF01499374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz, J. H., & Reeshad, D. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. Psychological Experiments on the Internet (M. H. Birnbaum, Ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lips, H. M. (2005). Sex and gender: An introduction (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., & McManus, L. A. (2017). Methodology matters: Comparing sample types and data collection methods in a juror decision-making study on the influence of defendant race. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 1–16. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2017.1409895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeder, E. M., Yamamoto, S., McManus, L. A., & Capaldi, C. A. (2016). Race-crime congruency in the Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 48, 162–170. doi:10.1037/cbs0000045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The ‘Black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgements towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1–16. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315–1338. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01552.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, M. L., & Gray, J. M. (2007). The impact of defendant grnder and relationshop to victim on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(7), 1578–1593. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00228.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Masters, J. M., Masser, B. M., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2013). Stereotypical and counterstereotypical defendants: Who is he and what was the case against her? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(3), 343–354.10.1037/a0030505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Newton, C. J., Terry, D. J., & Schuller, R. A. (2004). Jurors’ responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 131–143. doi:10.1177/1368430204043724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, D. J., Dempsey, J., Maeder, E., & Allen, L. (2010). The effects of victim gender, defendant gender, and defendant age on juror decision making. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 47–63. doi:10.1177/0093854809344173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quas, J. A., Bottoms, B. L., Haegerich, T. M., & Nysse-Carris, K. L. (2002). Effects of victim, defendant and juror gender on decisions in child sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 1993–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the internet in psychological research: Comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpscyhological Behavior, 6(1), 73–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Davies, M. (2007). Perceptions of victims and perpetrators in a depicted child sexual abuse case: Gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 566–584. doi:10.1080/10538710802584668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheriffs, A. C., & McKee, J. P. (1957). Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Psychology, 35, 161–168. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1957.tb01540.x
   Google Scholar
• Skorinko, J. L., & Spellman, B. A. (2013). Stereotypic crimes: How group-crime associations affect memory and (sometimes) verdicts and sentencing. Victims & Offenders, 8, 278–307. doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.755140
   Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Kramer, J. H. (1982). Sex-based differences in the sentencing of adult criminal defendants: An empirical test and theoretical overview. Sociology & Social Research, 66(3), 289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Strub, T., & McKimmie, B. M. (2016). Sugar and spice and all things nice: The role of gender stereotypes in jurors’ perceptions of criminal defendants. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(4), 487–498. doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1080151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunnafrank, M., & Fontes, N. E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2010). Race, gender, and the social construction of mental illness in the criminal justice system. Sociological Perspectives, 53(1), 99–126. doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.1.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2012). Crime in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, J. H., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, K. M. (2001). Is all sexual arrassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same and cross-gender cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 179–187. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=2001-17500-00110.1037/0021-9010.86.2.179
   Google Scholar
• Wiest, J. B., & Duffy, M. (2013). The impact of gender roles on verdicts and sentences in cases of filicide. Criminal Justice Studies, 26(3), 347–365. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2012.733873
   Google Scholar