Defining far transfer via thematic similarity

References

• Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., & Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1p1), 329–346. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00703.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61–100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broudy, H. S. (1977). Types of knowledge and purposes of education. In A. Rc, S. Rj, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 1–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & VanLehn, K. A. (2012). Seeing deep structure from the interactions of surface features. Educational Psychologist, 47, 177–188. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.695709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A. (2012). Educational psychologist. In Special issue: New conceptualizations of transfer of learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 1–24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. (2012). The resurgence of research transfer: An introduction to the final articles of the transfer strand. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 347–352. doi:10.1080/10508406.2012.707994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, B. R. (2012). Beyond physics: A case for far transfer. Instructional Science, 40, 515–535. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9188-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, B. R. (2016). Students’ epistemic worldview preferences predict selective recall across history and physics texts. Educational Psychology, 36, 1–22. doi:10.1080/01443410.2014.907557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science Society, 7, 155–170. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Anggoro, F. K., & Klibanoff, R. S. (2011). Structure mapping and relational language support children’s learning of relational categories. Child Development, 82, 1173–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01599.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 393–408. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., & Scherr, R. E., Edward F. Redish. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre, et al. (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives [working title]. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, pp. 89–119.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Kafai, Y. B. (2012). Journal of the learning sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, G. J. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, S., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P., et al. (2014). The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory & Cognition, 42, 464–480. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0364-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, J. A., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2013). Extraneous perceptual information interferes with children’s acquisition of mathematical knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 351–363. doi:10.1037/a0031040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Chen, Z. (2011). Finding one’s place in transfer space. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 196–204. doi:10.1111/cdep.2011.5.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., Roll, I. (2012). Learning to think: Cognitive mechanisms of knowledge transfer. The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 789–806, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2004). The psychology of worldviews. Review of General Psychology, 8, 3–58. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). Transfer of learning transformed. Language Learning, 63, 107–129. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00740.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform a rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32, 17–20. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001017
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative perspectives on the transfer of learning: History, issues, and challenges for future research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 431–449. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobato, J. (2012). The actor-oriented transfer perspective and its contributions to educational research and practice. Educational Psychologist, 47, 232–247. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.693353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L., & Schwartz, D. L. (2013). Conceptual innovation and transfer. In: S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, (2nd ed., pp. 447–465). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., & Bromme, R. (2010). Metacognition and learning. In R. Azevedo (Ed.), Special issue on “Situating and relating epistemological beliefs into metacognition: Studies on beliefs about knowledge and knowing”. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254–278. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. N, & Salomon, G. (2012). Knowledge to go: a motivational and dispositional view of transfer. Educational Psychologist, 47(3), 248–258. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.693354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (2012). Learning by mapping across situations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 353–398. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.607007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and rewards of an interdisciplinary research path. Science, 306(5704), 2046. doi:10.1126/science.306.5698.956a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Stigler, J. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 47, 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. (1999). Looking toward the 21st Century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X028007004
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2013). Conceptual integration and measurement of epistemological and ontological beliefs in educational research. ISRN Education, 2013, 1–19. doi:10.1155/2013/327680
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., & Bransford, J. D. (2012). Resisting overzealous transfer: Coordinating previously successful routines with needs for new learning. Educational Psychologist, 47, 204–214. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.696317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1999). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. J., & Coulson, R. L. & Anderson, D. K. (1989). Multiple analogies for complex concepts: Antidotes for analogy-induced misconception in advanced knowledge acquisition. In S. Vosniadou, A. Ortony, et al. (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 498–531.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P., & Coulson, R. (1996). Two epistemic world-views: Prefigurative schemas and learning in complex domains. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 51–61. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18, 513–527. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Super, C. M., & Harkness, S. (2003). The metaphors of development. Human Development, 46, 3–23. doi:10.1159/000067782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendetti, M. S., Wu, A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2014). Far-out thinking: Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. In Psychological science, 25(4), 928–933, doi:10.1177/0956797613518079.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. F. (2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition & Instruction, 24, 1–71. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1973). Metahistory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure‐mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35, 1456–1488. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01194.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar