Cultural validity trouble in measuring value concept: A study on validity of Schwartz Value Survey in Turkish culture

References

• Altınbaşak-Farina, İ., & Güleryüz-Türkel, G. (2017). A comprehensive study of the prevalent personal values: Investigating working generatin of Y’ers in Turkey. Boğaziçi Journal Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, 31(1), 59–81. doi:10.21773/boun.31.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Altıntaş, F. Ç. (2008). A comparative analysis of Turkish and German managers’ personal values. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 63(4), 65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173. doi:10.1007/BF02294170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcı, F. A., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2010). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin “değer” kavramına yükledikleri anlamlar [Meanings attributed to the concept of “value” by primary school teachers]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Baloğlu, M., & Balgalmış, E. (2005). The description of self-values among primary -and- high school administrators. Journal of Values Education -Turkey, 3(10), 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (1992). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betz, N. E. (1996). Test construction. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook (pp. 239–250). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, P., Hupfeld, J., & Meier, L. L. (2008). Personal values and relational models. European Journal of Personality, 22, 609–628. doi:10.1002/per.693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1997). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for windows. A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validity research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019–1031. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, L. A., & Bitner, M. J. (1990). Organizational structure of values. Journal of Business Research, 20(2), 123–134. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(90)90056-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasari, R. P. (2017). Value system and value preferences of prospective teachers of secondary schools: Am Indian survey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(8), 1403–1409. doi:10.13189/ujer.2017.050814
   Google Scholar
• Davison, M. L. (1983). Multidimensional scaling. NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, T., Spini, D., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Conflicts among human values and trust in institutions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 481–494. doi:10.1348/014466602321149849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilmaç, B., Aricak, O. T., & Cesur, S. (2014). A validity and reliability study on the development of the values scale in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(5), 1661–1671. doi:10.12738/estp.2014.5.2124
   Google Scholar
• Dilmaç, B., & Ekşi, H. (2007). Values education. Journal of Teacher, 14, 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1993). Manual for the constructive thinking inventory. MA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, A. R. (2007). An important factor of culture of education faculties: Values (A case study of the education faculty of PAU). Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Eroğlu, S. E., Dilmaç, B., Yilmaz, H., & Koksal, O. (2013). Examining the relationship between human values and democracy which teacher candidates have. International Journal of Academic Research Part B, 5(1), 218–225. doi:10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-1/B.33
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (2004). Value correlates of ambivalent attitude toward gender relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 3–12. doi:10.1177/0146167203258825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, J. R., Kapoor, M., & Cowman, S. (2005). Exploring the relationship between students’ values and the values of postsecondary institutions. Social Psychology of Education, 8, 207–221. doi:10.1007/s11218-004-5097-1
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, J., & Gilbert, N. (2006). Understanding social statistics. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Finegan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149–169. doi:10.1348/096317900166958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaz, S. (2015). The importance of terminal values and religious experience of God’s presence and God’s absence in the lives of university students with various levels of empathy. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(3), 1052–1067. doi:10.1007/s10943-014-9884-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülgöz, S. (2005). Five factor theory and NEO-PI-R in Turkey. In J. Allik & R. R. McCrae (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. pp.175–196). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Halsted, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (1996). Values in education and education in values. Washington: The Palmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P., & Spielberger, C. (Eds). (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence S. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburg, M. (1985). Basic statistics: A modern approach. NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Haydon, G. (2006). Values in education. NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Honkanen, P., & Verplanken, B. (2004). Understanding attitudes towards genetically modified food: The role of values and attitude strength. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 401–420. doi:10.1007/s10603-004-2524-9
   Google Scholar
• Hu, I., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure modelling: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüseyniklioğlu, B. (2010). Examination of the relationship between individual values and level of organizational commitment among military hospital employees (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Çukurova University, Adana.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51. Mooresvile: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1996). The autonomous-relational self a new synthesis. European Psychologist, 1, 180–186. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.1.3.180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangwa, J., & Olubodun, F. (2003). A factor approach to analysis of home maintenance outcomes and attributes of management successes in the owner-occupied sector. Structural Survey, 21(4), 158–172. doi:10.1108/02630800310507168
   Google Scholar
• Karakitapoglu Aygün, Z., & Imamoglu, E. O. (2002). Value domains of Turkish adults and university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(3), 333–351. doi:10.1080/00224540209603903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karalar, R., & Kiracı, H. (2010). A research on class teachers related to determining the effects of consumers’ personal values on sustainable consumption behavior. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 79–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Kilmann, R. H. (1975). A scaled-projective measure of interpersonal values. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 34–40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa3904_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kızılçelik, S., & Erjem, Y. (1992). Annotated glossary of terms in sociology. Konya: Günay Ofset.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp.388–433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674863507.c8
   Google Scholar
• Knoppen, D., & Saris, W. (2009). Do we have to combine values in the Schwarts’ human values scale? A comment on the Davidov studies. Survey Research Methods, 3(2), 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kozan, M. K, & Ergin, C. (1999). The influence of intra-cultural differences on conflict management practices. The International Journal Of Conflict Management, 10(3), 249-267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnik, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1988). A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: Ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 526–538. doi:10.1086/269128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuşdil, M. E., & Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2000). Orientation of the Turkish teachers’ values and Schwartz theory of value. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 15(45), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Leuty, M. E., & Hansen, J. C. (2013). Building evidence of validity: The relation between work values, interest, personality, and personal values. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 175–189. doi:10.1177/1069072712466714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz’s Value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 170–178. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8502_09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, S. (2003) An exploration of generational values in life and at work ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carleton University, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391–410. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1991). The personal value questionnaire. Boston: McBer & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Meglino, M. B., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in education: Concepts, controvercies, and research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351–389. doi:10.1177/014920639802400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miethe, T. D. (1985). The validity and reliability of value measurements. Journal of Psychology, 119(5), 441–453. doi:10.1080/00223980.1985.9712608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basics of social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Nodelko, Z. (2015). Ethics of managers in Slovenian public administration. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 20(2), 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 740–756. doi:10.1177/001391602237244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks-Leduc, L., Feldman, G., & Bardi, A. (2015). Personality traits and personal values: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/1088868314538548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Reynaud, E., Srinivasan, N., Furrer, O., Brock, D., … Wallace, A. (2011). A twenty-first century assessment of values across the glocal workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 1–31. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0835-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, K. M. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory rotation strategies in exploratory factor analysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406446).
   Google Scholar
• Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Navon, M. (2017). Methodological issues in studying personal values. In S. Roccas & L. Sagiv (Eds.), Values and behaviors: Taking a cross cultural perspective (pp. 15–50). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56352-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 789–801. doi:10.1177/0146167202289008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohan, M. (2000). A rose by any name? The value construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255–277. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of the human values. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or d detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 561–582. doi:10.1080/10705510903203433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyerr, O. O., Strauss, J., & Yan, J. (2005). Individual value structure and diversity attitudes: The moderating effects of age, gender, race, and religiosity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 498–521. doi:10.1108/02683940510615442
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W., & Zelenzy, L. (1998). Values and proenvironmental behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540–558. doi:10.1177/0022022198294003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157. doi:10.1177/0022022190212001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theorical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–66). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994a). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994b). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. doi:10.1111/josi.1994.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2006a). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 249–288. doi:10.3917/rfs.474.0929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2006b). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5, 137–182. doi:10.1163/156913306778667357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1116
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00069-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. doi:10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. doi:10.1177/0022022101032005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Rubel, T. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116. doi:10.1177/0022022195261007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S.H. (2003). Basic human values: their content and structure across countries. In A. Tamayo & J. Porto (Eds.), Valores e trabalho [Values and work]. Brasilia: Editora Universidade de Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• Spini, D. (2003). Measurement equivalence of 10 value types from the Schwartz Value Survey across 21 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0022022102239152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spranger, E. (1928). Types of men. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, C. D. (1997). Basic concepts in exploratory factor analysis as a tool to evaluate score validity: A right-brained approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED407419).
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Struch, N., Schwartz, S. H., & van der Kloot, W. A. (2002). Meanings of basic values for women and men: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 16–28. doi:10.1177/0146167202281002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhonen, P. 1985. “Approaches to value research anda value measurement.” Acta Sociologica 28(4): 349–358. a_7452. doi:10.1177/000169938502800404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexical typologies. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tevrüz, S., Turgut, T., & Çinko, M. (2015). Integrating Turkish work and achievement goals with Schwartz’s human values. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 259–279. doi:10.5964/ejop.v11i2.825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waege, H., Billiet, J., & Pleysier, S. (2000). Validation by means of method variation: A CFA approach to the SSA-value-typology of Schwartz. In A. Ferligoj & A. Mrvar (Eds.), Developments in survey methodology (pp. 75–91). Ljublijana: Metodoloski Zvezki 15. FDV.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. doi:10.1108/14601060410565056
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. M. (1968). Values. In E. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp.283-287). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. A., Newton, R. M., & Kirkpatrick, R. L. (1998). The influence of work values on teacher selection decisions: The effects of principal values, teacher values, and principal- teacher value interactions. Teaching & Teacher Education, 14, 385–400. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(97)00046-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittaker, T. A. (2012). Using modification index and standardized expected parameter change for model modification. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 26–44. doi:10.1080/00220973.2010.531299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar