1,650
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY

End-state comfort effects in adults with intellectual disabilities: A pilot study

, ORCID Icon & | (Reviewing editor)
Article: 1896120 | Received 18 Aug 2020, Accepted 21 Feb 2021, Published online: 04 Mar 2021

References

  • Adalbjornsson, C. F., Fischman, M. G., & Rudisill, M. E. (2008). The end-state comfort effect in young children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(1), 36–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2008.10599458
  • Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edn.
  • Brydges, C. R., Reid, C. L., Fox, A. M., & Anderson, M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence, 40(5), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.006
  • Comalli, D. M., Keen, R., Abraham, E. S., Foo, V. J., Lee, M. H., & Adolph, K. E. (2016). The development of tool use: planning for end-state comfort. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1878–1892. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000207
  • Haishi, K., Okuzumi, H., & Kokubun, M. (2011). Effects of age, intelligence and executive control function on saccadic reaction time in persons with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2644–2650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.009
  • Henry, L. (2012). The development of working memory in children. SAGE Publications.
  • Hirata, S., Okuzumi, H., Kitajima, Y., Hosobuchi, T., & Kokubun, M. (2013). Speed and accuracy of motor and cognitive control in children with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 59(3), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387712Y.0000000010
  • Hirata, S., Okuzumi, H., Kitajima, Y., Hosobuchi, T., Nakai, A., & Kokubun, M. (2014). Relationship between motor skill and social impairment in children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 60(4), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387713Y.0000000033
  • Hughes, C. (1996). Brief report: Planning problems in autism at the level of motor control. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02276237
  • Lamar, M., & Libon, D. J. (2011). Perseveration. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1619
  • Mutsaarts, M., Steenbergen, B., & Bekkering, H. (2006). Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Experimental Brain Research, 172(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0327-0
  • Rosenbaum, D. A. (2017). Knowing hands: the cognitive psychology of manual control. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J., & Jorgensen, M. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321–342). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rosenbaum, D. A., Van Heugten, C. M., & Caldwell, G. E. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94(1), 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(95)00062-3
  • Scharoun, S. M., & Bryden, P. J. (2016). Anticipatory planning in children with autism spectrum disorder: an assessment of independent and joint action tasks. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 10(29). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2016.00029
  • Steenbergen, B., Hulstijn, W., & Dortmans, S. (2000). Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy. minimising discomfort. Experimental Brain Research, 134(3), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000458
  • Steenbergen, B., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: Effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy, and context. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.11.008
  • Stöckel, T., & Hughes, C. M. (2015). Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 51(9), 1254–1261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039506
  • Stöckel, T., & Hughes, C. M. (2016). The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children. Psychological Research, 80(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0662-0
  • Stöckel, T., Hughes, C. M., & Schack, T. (2012). Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children. Psychological Research, 76(6), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0387-7
  • Sugishita, M., & Yamazaki, K. (1993). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices. Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Co., Ltd.
  • Ueno, K., Nagosh, S., & Konuki, S. (2008). Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Nihon Bunka Kagakusha Co., Ltd.
  • Van Swieten, L. M., Van Bergen, E., Williams, J. H., Wilson, A. D., Plumb, M. S., Kent, S. W., & Mon-Williams, M. A. (2010). A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017177
  • Wunsch, K., Henning, A., Aschersleben, G., & Weigelt, M. (2013). A systematic review of the end-state comfort effect in normally developing children and in children with developmental disorders. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1(3), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.1.3.59
  • Wunsch, K., Weigelt, M., & Stöckel, T. (2017). Anticipatory motor planning in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv078
  • Wunsch, K., Weiss, D. J., Schack, T., & Weigelt, M. (2015). Second-order motor planning in children: Insights from a cup-manipulation-task. Psychological Research, 79(4), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0596-y