Conceptual structure of self-curiosity in Japan

References

• Aschieri, F., & Durosini, I. (2015). Development of the self-curiosity attitude-interest scale. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22(3), 327–11. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM22.3.2
   Google Scholar
• Aschieri, F., Durosini, I., Locatelli, M., Gennari, M., & Smith, J. D. (2016). Factor structure invariance and discriminant validity of the self-curiosity attitude-interest scale. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM23.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Aschieri, F., Durosini, I., & Smith, J. D. (2020). Self-curiosity: Definition and measurement. Self and Identity, 19(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1543728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschieri, F., Quiroga, A., Tagliabue, S., & Durosini, I. (2021). Psychometric properties of the self-curiosity attitude-interest scale in two paired samples from Italy and Mexico. TPM–Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 28(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM28.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durosini, I., Fantini, F., Ramírez, C. D. E., Rodríguez, A. M. R., Richter, M. J., & Aschieri, F. (2018). Validation of the self-curiosity attitude-interest scale in Colombia. Suma Psicológica, 25(1), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.a2018.v25.n1.1
   Google Scholar
• Finn, S. E. (1996). Manual for using the MMPI-2 as a therapeutic intervention. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, S. E. (2007). In our clients’ shoes: Theory and techniques of therapeutic assessment. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlova, M., Lecbych, M., Dostal, D., Dolejs, M., Sucha, J., & Aschieri, F. (2018). Czech version of the self-curiosity attitude-interest scale (Scis), and its use in adolescents: Pilot applications, psychometric properties and normative study. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 62(6), 591–601. http://hdl.handle.net/10807/146644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066332
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, T., & Yasuoka, H. (2012). A case study of a Rorschach feedback session for a client in his late 20ʹs suffering from withdrawal (in Japanese). Journal of Japanese Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 205–216. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40019362342/.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, V., & Brdaric, D. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Evidence from subjective well-being in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumamoto, M. (2016). The counseling process for a young adult with developmental disorders : How she comes to understand and learn to accept herself : A case study of a university student receiving counseling (in Japanese). Journal of Japanese Clinical Psychology, 34(2), 162–172. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40020896861/
   Google Scholar
• Namikawa, T., Tani, I., Wakita, T., Kumagai, R., Nakane, A., & Noguchi, H. (2012). Development of a short form of the Japanese Big-Five Scale, and a test of its reliability and validity (in Japanese). The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 83(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.83.91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oishi, S. (2009). Kofuku wo Kagaku suru [The science of happiness] (in Japanese). Shin-yo-sha.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.509.4258&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, P. (2014). Cross sectional studies: Advantages and disadvantages. British Medical Journal, 348, g2276. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P. E., Weeks, H. M., Richards, B., & Kaciroti, N. (2018). Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement. Pediatric Research, 84(3), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0039-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takano, K., & Tanno, Y. (2008). Development of Japanese-version rumination-reflection questionnaire (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Personality, 16(2), 259–261. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.16.259
   Google Scholar
• Tasaki, K., & Shin, J. (2017). Japanese response bias: Cross-level and cross-national comparisons on response styles. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 88(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.88.15065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P., & ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar