Methodological issues with value-based decision-making (VBDM) tasks: The effect of trial wording on evidence accumulation outputs from the EZ drift-diffusion model

References

• Abma, I. L., Rovers, M., & van der Wees, P. J. (2016). Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2034-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkman, E. T., Hutcherson, C. A., Livingston, J. L., Kahn, L. E., & Inzlicht, M. (2017). Self-control as value-based choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 422–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417704394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113(4), 700–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., Gluth, S., Rieskamp, J., & Turner, B. M. (2019). Cognitive and neural bases of multi-attribute, multi-alternative, value-based decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colas, J. T. (2017). Value-based decision making via sequential sampling with hierarchical competition and attentional modulation. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, A., Stafford, T., & Field, M. (2021). Recovery from addiction: A synthesis of perspectives from behavioral economics, psychology, and decision modeling. In D. Frings & I. P. Albery (Eds.), The Handbook of Alcohol Use (pp. 563–579). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816720-5.00002-5
   Google Scholar
• Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S. D., Cassey, P., Evans, N. J., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Hawkins, G. E., Heathcote, A., Holmes, W. R., Krypotos, A.-M., Kupitz, C. N., Leite, F. P., Lerche, V., Lin, Y.-S., Logan, G. D., Palmeri, T. J., Starns, J. J., Trueblood, J. S., van Maanen, L., … Donkin, C. (2019). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1417-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, M., Heather, N., Murphy, J. G., Stafford, T., Tucker, J. A., & Witkiewitz, K. (2020). Recovery from addiction: Behavioral economics and value-based decision making. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 34(1), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2021). JASP (Version 0.16). https://jasp-stats.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010). Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13(10), 1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2021). Sample size justification. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. J., & Glimcher, P. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(6), 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2012.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., Saunders, B., Friese, M., Evans, N. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Strong effort manipulations reduce response caution: A preregistered reinvention of the ego-depletion paradigm. Psychological Science, 31(5), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, S. J., & Stoops, W. W. (2015). Cocaine choice procedures in animals, humans, and treatment-seekers: Can we bridge the divide? Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 138, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mormann, M., Malmaud, J., Huth, A., Koch, C., & Rangel, A. (2010). The drift diffusion model can account for the accuracy and reaction time of value-based choices under high and low time pressure. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(6), 437–449. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1901533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, C. R., Jones, A., Bartlett, J. E., Copeland, A., & Shaw, D. J. (2021). Raising the bar: Improving methodological rigour in cognitive alcohol research. Addiction, 116(11), 3243–3251. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanía, R., Krajbich, I., Grueschow, M., & Ruff, C. C. (2014). Neural oscillations and synchronization differentially support evidence accumulation in perceptual and value-based decision making. Neuron, 82(3), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, A., Camerer, C., & Montague, P. R. (2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2006). Aging, practice, and perceptual tasks: A diffusion model analysis. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20(4), 873–922. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, T., Pirrone, A., Croucher, M., & Krystalli, A. (2020). Quantifying the benefits of using decision models with response time and accuracy data. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5), 2142–2155. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01372-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toet, A., Kaneko, D., de Kruijf, I., Ushiama, S., van Schaik, M. G., Brouwer, A.-M., Kallen, V., & van Erp, J. B. F. (2019). CROCUFID: A cross-cultural food image database for research on food elicited affective responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 101, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusche, A., & Hutcherson, C. A. (2018). Cognitive regulation alters social and dietary choice by changing attribute representations in domain-general and domain-specific brain circuits. ELife, 7, e31185. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ravenzwaaij, D., Donkin, C., & Vandekerckhove, J. (2017). The EZ diffusion model provides a powerful test of simple empirical effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(2), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1081-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, A., Voss, J., & Lerche, V. (2015). Assessing cognitive processes with diffusion model analyses: A tutorial based on fast-dm-30. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00336; https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Van Der Maas, H. L. J., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2007). An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E.-J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E.-J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar